References

• Alexander, L. B., & Luborsky, L. (1986). The Penn helping alliance scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsoff (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325–366). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd revised ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, U., Sodemonn, U., & Tobien, H. (1980). Direkte versus indirekte Veränderungsdiagnostik [Direct versus indirect change diagnostics]. Zeitschrift für Differenzielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems of measuring change (pp. 3–20). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, R. (1970). How we should measure “change”- Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.10.1037/h0029382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, K. N., Milbrath, C., & Wallerstein, R. S. (1999). Scales of psychological capacities: Support for a measure of structural change. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 22, 453–480.
   Google Scholar
• Flückiger, C., Regli, D., Grawe, K., & Lutz, W. (2007). Similarities and differences between retrospective and pre-post measurements of outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 371–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S., & Pinsof, W. M. (Eds.). (1986). The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. W. (Ed.). (1963). Problems of measuring change. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, R. L., & Barends, A. W. (1996). Patients’ view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1326–1336.10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., Chui, H., & Baumann, E. (2013). Revisiting and reenvisioning the outcome problem in psychotherapy: An argument to include individualized and qualitative measurement. Psychotherapy, 50, 68–76.10.1037/a0030571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., & Dailey, P. R. (1979). Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 144–150.10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., Millham, J., Slaten, S., & O’Donnell, L. (1981). Influence of subject response style effects on retrospective measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 89–100.10.1177/014662168100500113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., Ralph, K. M., Gulanick, N. A., Maxwell, S. A., Nance, D. W., & Gerber, S. K. (1979). Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a reevaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., Schmeck, R. R., & Bray, J. H. (1979). Internal invalidity in studies employing self-report instruments: A suggested remedy. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 129–135.10.1111/jedm.1979.16.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K. I., Krause, M. S., Caburnay, C. A., Noel, S. B., & Saunders, S. M. (2001). Syzygy, science, and psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 865–874.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckert, T. F., Hank, P., & Krampen, G. (2012). Veränderungen in der Symptombelastung während der Wartezeit auf einen ambulanten Psychotherapieplatz [Changes in symptom distress while waiting for an outpatient psychotherapy]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 62, 301–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Krampen, G. (2010a). Direct measurement of psychotherapeutic outcomes: Experimental construction and validation of a brief scale. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Krampen, G. (2010b). Experimentelle Konstruktion eines Kurzfragebogens zur direkten Veränderungsmessung psychotherapeutischer Effekte im Befinden [Experimental construction of a brief questionnaire to measure psychotherapeutic effects]. Diagnostica, 56, 212–221.10.1026/0012-1924/a000024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J. (2010). What is psychotherapy outcome and how is it measured in contrasting research paradigms? In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Prevention of treatment failure: The use of measuring, monitoring, and feedback in clinical practice (pp. 29–58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/12141-000
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, W., Salzer, M. S., & Bickman, L. (1998). Clinical outcome, consumer satisfaction, and ad hoc ratings of improvement in children’s mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 270–279.10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. (1963). Elementary models for measuring change. In C.W. Harris (Ed.), Problems of measuring change (pp. 21–38). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lunnen, K. M., Ogles, B. M., & Pappas, L. N. (2008). A multiperspective comparison of satisfaction, symptomatic change, perceived change, and end-point functioning. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 145–152.10.1037/0735-7028.39.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalak, J., Kosfelder, J., Meyer, F., & Schulte, D. (2003). Messung des Therapieerfolgs: Veränderungsmasse oder retrospective Erfolgsbeurteilung [Measurement of therapy effect: Change criterion or retrospective effect assessment]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 32, 94–103.10.1026/0084-5345.32.2.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, J., Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1979). Measuring the outcomes of psychotherapy: Findings of the Penn Psychotherapy Project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 319–334.10.1037/0022-006X.47.2.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J., & Owen, J. (2014). Assessing outcomes: Practical methods and evidence. Journal of College Counseling, 17, 175–185.10.1002/jocc.2014.17.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Isakson, R. L., Worthen, V. E., Gregersen, A. T., & Lambert, M. J. (2004). The Consumer Reports effectiveness score: What did consumers report? Journal of Counseling, 51, 25–37.10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, T., Svensson, M., Sandell, R., & Clinton, D. (2007). Patients’ experiences of change in cognitive-behaviour therapy and psychodynamic therapy: A qualitative comparative study. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 553–566.10.1080/10503300601139988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogles, B. M. (2013). Measuring change in psychotherapy research. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 134–166). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pazo Pires, A., Camacho Goncalves, J. A., da Silva Sá, V. J., Silva, A., & Sandell, R. (2016). Assessment of change in psychoanalysis: Another way of using the CHAP (Change After Psychotherapy) scales. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 64, 285–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarik, G., & Wolff, C. B. (1996). Relationship of satisfaction to symptom change, follow-up adjustment, and clinical significance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 202–208.10.1037/0735-7028.27.2.202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726–748.10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, R. (1987a). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. II. A procedure for direct rating of psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 37–43.10.1159/000287996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, R. (1987b). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. III. Reliability and validity of ‘Change after Psychotherapy’. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 44–52.10.1159/000287997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, R. (2015). Rating the outcomes of psychotherapy using the Change after Psychotherapy (CHAP) scales. Manual and commentary. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 18, 32–49. doi:10.7411/RP.2015.111
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, D. (1995). How treatment success could be assessed. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 281–296.10.1080/10503309512331331406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderberg, P., Tungström, S., & Armelius, B.-Å. (2005). Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff. Psychiatric Services, 56, 434–438. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonesson, O., Tjus, T., & Arvidsson, H. (2010). Reliability of a functioning scale (GAF) among psychiatric ward staff. Nordic Psychology, 62, 53–64.10.1027/1901-2276/a000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strupp, H. H., Horowitz, L. M., & Lambert, M. J. (Eds.). (1997). Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders: Toward a core battery. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Svanborg, P., & Åsberg, M. (1994). A new self-rating scale for depression and anxiety states based on the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 89, 21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waskow, I. E., & Parloff, M. B. (1972). Psychotherapy change measures: Report of the clinical research branch outcome measures project. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Weinryb, R. M., & Rössel, R.J. (1991). Karolinska psychodynamic profile – KAPP. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 83(Suppl. 363), 1–23.10.1111/acp.1991.83.issue-s363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilczek, A., Weinryb, R. M., Gustavsson, P. J., Barber, J. P., Schubert, J., & Åsberg, M. (1997). Symptoms and character traits in patients selected for long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7(1), 23–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willutzki, U., Ülsmann, D., Schulte, D., & Veith, A. (2013). Direkte Veränderungsmessung in der Psychotherapie: Der Bochumer Veränderungsbogen-2000 (BVB-2000) [Direct change measurement in psychotherapy: The Bochum change Questionnaire-2000 (BVB-2000)]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 42, 256–268.10.1026/1616-3443/a000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielke, M. (1978). Validation of a therapy-oriented questionnaire to measure change. Diagnostica, 24, 89–102.
   Google Scholar