References

• APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnason, V. (2000). Gadamerian dialogue in the patient-professional interaction. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal, 3, 17–23.10.1023/A:1009908132170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bem, S., & Looren de Jong, H. (2006). Theoretical issues in psychology: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, L. (2010). A critical review of the scientist-practitioner model for counselling psychology. Counselling Psychology Review, 25, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, L. J., & Darlaston-Jones, D. (2010). Moving beyond the enduring dominance of positivism in psychological research: Implications for psychology in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 45, 67–76.10.1080/00050060903127481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. I. (1990). Rationality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chessick, R. D. (1995). The application of phenomenology to psychiatry and psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 49, 159–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwalisz, K. (2003). Evidence-based practice: A framework for twenty-first-century scientist-practitioner training. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 497–528.10.1177/0011000003256347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. M. (2007). Original research in pathology: Judgment, or evidence-based medicine? Laboratory Investigation, 87, 104–114.10.1038/labinvest.3700511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J. (1998). Gadamer: Psychotherapy as conversation. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 1, 421–433.10.1080/13642539808400529
   Google Scholar
• Fava, G. A. (2013). Clinical judgment in psychiatry. Requiem or reveille? Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 67(1), 1–10.10.3109/08039488.2012.701665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810503
   Google Scholar
• Gamsu, M. (2008). The biased therapist. Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 19, 238–245.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. (1995). Phenomenological psychology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 24–42). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guignon, C. (2012). Becoming a person: Hermeneutic phenomenology’s contribution. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 97–106.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, P. (1993). Rationality, judgment, and critical inquiry. The Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 1(3).
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P. (2011). DSM diagnosis and beyond: On the need for a hermeneutically-informed biopsychosocial framework. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 14, 163–175.10.1007/s11019-010-9284-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshmand, L. T., & Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47, 55–66.10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsberger, P. H. (2007). Reestablishing clinical psychology’s subjective core. American Psychologist, 62, 614–615.10.1037/0003-066X62.6.614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, L. M., & Phillips, S. N. (2003). The immovable object versus the irresistible force: Problems and opportunities for humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43, 156–173.10.1177/0022167803043003013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, D. (1995). Objectivity, truth, and method. Anthropology Newsletter, 36, 42–43.10.1111/anne.1995.36.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (2001). Interpreting human kinds: Beginnings of a hermeneutic psychology. Theory & Psychology, 11, 193–207.10.1177/0959354301112003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Thompson, J. (2003). Psychotherapy as the the interpretaton of being: Hermeneutic perspectives on psychotherapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16(1), 1–16.10.1080/10720530390117830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2010). Psychotherapy according to the Socratic method: Integrating ancient philosophy with contemporary cognitive therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24, 354–363.10.1891/0889-8391.24.4.354
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (1996). Key concepts: Hermeneutics. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 3, 61–69.10.1353/ppp.1996.0007
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2004). Understanding/explanation. In J. Radden (Ed.), The philosophy of psychiatry: A companion (pp. 180–190). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (2000). Psychological inquiry and the pragmatic and hermeneutic traditions. Theory & Psychology, 10, 453–479.10.1177/0959354300104002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (2004). Practice and the human sciences: The case for a judgement-based practice of care. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 126–136.10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, D. L. (1994). Human science and counselling psychology: Closing the gap between research and practice. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 7, 235–250.10.1080/09515079408254149
   Google Scholar
• Slife, B. D., & Gantt, E. E. (1999). Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1453–1465.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (1996). Evolving issues for qualitative psychology. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 189–201). Leicester: BPS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Harre, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1995). Introduction. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 1–9). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strawbridge, S. (2006). Thoughts on becoming, being and developing as a counselling psychologist. Counselling Psychology Review, 21, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Stricker, G. (2003). Evidence-based practice: The wave of the past. Counseling Psychologist, 31, 546–554.10.1177/0011000003256351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stricker, G. (2010). A second look at psychotherapy integration. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 20, 397–405.10.1037/a0022037
   Google Scholar
• Stricker, G., & Trierweiler, S. J. (1995/2006). The local clinical scientist: A bridge between science and practice. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, S, 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Todres, L. (2008). Being with that: The relevance of embodied understanding for practice. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1566–1573.10.1177/1049732308324249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Langenhove, L. (1995). The theoretical foundations of experimental psychology and its alternatives. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 10–23). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R. (2004). What is good psychotherapy? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44, 455–467.10.1177/0022167804266097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. E. (2003). Bashing positivism and revering a medical model under the guise of evidence. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 539–545.10.1177/0011000003256356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. E., Goodheart, C. D., & Levant, R. F. (2007). Clarification and elaboration on evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 62, 616–618.10.1037/0003-066X62.6.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, D. C., Jr., & Slife, B. D. (2007). Is evidence-based practice diverse enough? Philosophy of science considerations American Psychologist, 62, 613–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdershoven, G. A. (2000). The doctor-patient relationship as a gadamerian dialogue: A response to Arnason. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal, 3, 25–27.10.1023/A:1009952102228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, R. N. (1990). The metaphysic of things and discourse about them. In J. E. Faulconer, & R. N. Williams (Eds.), Reconsidering psychology (pp. 136–150). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1996). Psychology, qualitative methods and the ideas of science. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods (pp. 11–23). Oxford: BPS Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yanchar, S. C., & Hill, J. R. (2003). What is psychology about? Toward an explicit ontology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43, 11–32.10.1177/0022167802238811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar