References

• Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control. Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV(pp. 183–218). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, R. (2003). The holding function of theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651030510010101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataria, Y. (2015). Trauma from an enactive perspective: the collapse of the knowing-how structure. Adaptive Behavior,23(3), 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J. A. (2006). Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bignall, S. (2015). “Every existence is an event”: Deleuze, Dewey, and Democracy. In S. Bowden, S. Bignall, & P. Patton (Eds.), Deleuze and Pragmatism(pp. 105–123). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blatt, S. J. (2008). Polarities of experience: Relatedness and self-definition in personality development. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (2001). Freudian intersubjectivity: Commentary on paper by Julie Gerhardt and Annie Sweetnam. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881109348597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, S. (2015). Antirepresentationalism and objectivity in Rorty, Brandom, and Deleuze. In S. Bowden, S. Bignall, & P. Patton (Eds.), Deleuze and Pragmatism(pp. 180–198). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, C. P. (2016). Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making:Thinking through practice. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, C. P. (2016). Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making: Thinking through practice. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, article 599. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00599
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, M. B., & Reich, U. (2014). Dancing insight: How psychotherapists use change of positioning in order to complement split-off areas of experience. Chaos and Complexity Letters, 8(2/3), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (2018). Doing valuable time: The present, the future, and meaningful living. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2002). Understanding Deleuze. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2015). Pragmatic finitudes. In S. Bowden, S. Bignall, & P. Patton (Eds.), Deleuze and pragmatism(pp. 253–268). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colombetti, G. (2013). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, S. J. (2011). Distributed language. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1–14). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1981. Experience and Nature.John Dewey: The Later Works, 19251953(vol. 1) (A.Boydston, Ed.). Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, S. (2020). Enactive psychiatry. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2013). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans. by). University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2007). Two Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews 1975–1995 (A.Hodges and M.Taormina, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy?. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies:The continuity between life and language. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Ettinger, B. L. (2020). Matrixial subjectivity, aesthetics, ethics: Volume 1 1990–2000. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Flieger, J. (1999). Overdetermined Oedipus: Mommy, Daddy, and me as desiring-machine. In: I. Buchanan (Ed.), A Deleuzian Century? (pp. 219–240). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395973-013
   Google Scholar
• Foehl, J. C. (2014). A phenomenology of depth. Psychoanalytic Dialogues24(3), 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberry, N. (2015). Contingency all the way down: Whitehead among the pragmatists. In B. G. Henning, W. T. Myers, & J. D. John (Eds.), Thinking with Whitehead and the American pragmatists: Experience and reality(pp. 97–115). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Froese, T., & Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 205–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-012-9254-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganeri, J. (2017). Attention, not self. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2013). Explore everything:Place-hacking the city. Verso Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. T. (2018/1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning: A philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genosko, G. (2002). A bestiary of territoriality and expression: Poster fish, bower birds, and spiny lobsters. In B. Massumi (Ed.), A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari(pp. 47–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work, an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18:(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American sociological association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, D. (2017). A beholder’s share: Essays on Winnicott and the psychoanalytic imagination. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, J. C. (2014). Traditional shamanism as embodied expertise on sense and non-sense. In M. Cappucio, T. Froese, & M. Cappuccio (Eds.), Enactive cognition at the edge of sense-making (pp. 266–284). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (2012). Theories of therapeutic action and their clinical consequences. In Gabbard, G. O., Litowitz, B. E., & Williams, P. (Eds.). Textbook of Psychoanalysis. Washington:American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2011). The relational tradition: Landscape and canon. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59(4), 701–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065111416655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, B. (2011). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. In S. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 135–160). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, B. M., & Thiele, K. (2018). If you do well, carry! The difference of the humane: An interview with Bracha L. Ettinger. PhiloSOPHIA, 8(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2018.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D. (2006). Distributed cognition: A methodological note. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.2.06kir
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. Connecticut: International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolyri, C. (2020). The body without organs in schizoanalysis. Deleuze and Guattari Studies, 14(3), 481–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2020.0413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konvalinka, I., Xygalatas, D., Bulbulia, J., Schjødt, U., Jegindø, E. M., Wallot, S., Van Orden G, & Roepstorff, A. (2011). Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8514–8519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016955108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingis, A. (1994). The community of those who have nothing in common. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1972). The Experience of Time. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27(1), 401–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1972.11822722
   Google Scholar
• Manakas, E. (2017). Poiesis in/between the Transferential Matrix: Insight, Imagination and the Relational Interpretation. [Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London]. Research Online, Goldsmiths University of London. http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/20921/
   Google Scholar
• Matte-Blanco, I. (1988). Thinking, Feeling, and Being: Clinical reflections on the fundamental antinomy of human beings and world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mole, C. (2011). Attention is cognitive unison: An essay in philosophical psychology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphie, A. (2010). Deleuze, Guattari, and neuroscience. In P. Gaffney (Ed.), The force of the virtual: Deleuze, science, and philosophy(pp. 277–299). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orsucci, F. (2009). Mind force: On human attractions (Vol. 12). World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2011). Symbols as constraints: The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 161–184). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2014). Nonverbal synchrony of head-and body-movement in psychotherapy: Different signals have different associations with outcome. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(979): 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00979
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. L. (2017). Trauma and the ontology of the modern subject: Historical studies in philosophy, psychology, and psychoanalysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. J. (2015). The effects of the postmodern turn in relational psychoanalysis. In P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Making our ideas clear: Pragmatism in psychoanalysis(pp. 1–20). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, C. B. (2015). Intentionality and the Myths of the given: Between pragmatism and phenomenology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salvatore, S., Tebaldi, C., & Poti, S. (2008). The discursive dynamic of sensemaking. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout-Yagodzynski, & J. Clegg (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science, volume 1/2008 (pp. 39–72). Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T.R. (2002). The Site of the Social:A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. (1984). Autonomy and rigid character. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2009). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics, technologies of lived abstraction. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. V. (2011). Beyond mind: An extended ecology of languaging. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 185–210). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. V. (2015). Distributed language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language Sciences, 50, 105–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2009). Thinking with Deleuze and Whitehead: A double test. In K. Robinson (Ed.), Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson, rhizomatic connections(pp. 28–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2010). Forms of vitality: Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuhr, J. J. (2015). Pragmatism and difference: What’s the use of calling Deleuze a pragmatist? In S. Bowden, S. Bignall, & P. Patton (Eds). Deleuze and Pragmatism(pp. 124–141). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, P. J. (2005). Brains, bodies, contextualizing activity and language: Do humans (and bonobos) have a language faculty, and can they do without one? Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.2005.1.1.99
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tschacher, W. (2014). Intentionality: Steps towards naturalization on the basis of complex dynamical systems. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/987-3-642-27737-5_290-3
   Google Scholar
• Watzl, S. (2012). The nature of attention. Philosophy Compass, 6(11), 842–853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00433.x
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, T. (2015). Compatibility between early psychoanalysis and pragmatism. In P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Making our ideas clear: Pragmatism in psychoanalysis(pp. 23–42). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar