References
- Campbell, L. M., Gray, N. J., Meletis, Z. A., Abbott, J. G., & Silver, J. J. (2006). Gatekeepers and keymasters: Dynamic relationships of access in geographical fieldwork. Geographical Review, 96, 97–121.
- Clark, T. (2011). Gaining and maintaining access. Exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationships between gatekeepers and researchers. Qualitative Social Work, 10, 485–502.
- De Laine, M. (2000). Fieldwork, participation and practice. London: Sage.
- Emmel, N., Hughes, K., Greenhalgh, J., & Sales, A. (2007). Accessing socially excluded people – Trust and the gatekeeper in the researcher-participant relationship. Sociological Research Online, 12. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/2/emmel.html
- Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2007). Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens: Negotiating consent in child and youth-oriented institutions. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 403–417.
- Homan, R. (2001). The principle of assumed consent: The ethics of gatekeeping. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 329–343.
- Kawulich, B. B. (2011). Gatekeeping: An ongoing adventure in research. Field Methods, 23, 57–76.
- kennedy-macfoy, m (2013). ‘Struggling to be recognised as belonging to the fauna of Norway’: On being black Norwegian women. In M. McEachrane (Ed.), Afro-Nordic landscapes: Engaging blackness in Northern Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Mandel, L. J. (2003). Negotiating expectations in the field: Gatekeepers, research fatigue and cultural biases. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24, 198–210.
- Miller, T., & Bell, L. (2012). Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’ consent. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 61–75). London: Sage.
- Muhrty, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 4, 837–855.
- Phillips, C., & Earle, R. (2010). Reading difference differently. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 360–378.
- Reeves, C. L. (2010). A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research, 10, 315–331.
- Ryan, L., & Golden, A. (2006). ‘Tick the box please’: A reflective approach to doing quantitative social research. Sociology, 40, 1191–1200.
- Sanghera, G. S., & Thapar-Björkert, S. (2008). Methodological dilemmas: Gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 543–562.
- Scott, J. (2010). Quantitative methods and gender inequalities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 223–236.
- Seale, C. (2004). History of qualitative methods. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture. London: Sage.
- Tidmarsh, J., Carpenter, J., & Slade, J. (2003). Practitioners as gatekeepers and researchers: Family support outcomes. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Practice, 23, 59–79.
- Wanat, C. L. (2008) Getting past the gatekeepers: Differences between access and cooperation in public school research. Field Notes, 20, 191–208.