The development of synchronous text-based instant messaging as an online interviewing tool

References

• Benford, P., & Standen, P. J. (2011). The use of email facilitated interviewing with higher functioning autistic people participating in a grounded theory study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 353–368. doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.534654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. (1998). Causality and complementarity: Supplementary papers. In J. Faye & Folse (Eds.), The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr, Volume IV. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In H. Reis, & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 3)–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005a). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005b). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 842–849. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2008a). Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 99–101. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9926.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2008b). Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 379–388. doi:10.1177/0894439307311611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., Fischer, A., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 766–785. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7, 327–353. doi:10.1177/1468794107078515.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D., Smyth, J., & Christian, L. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dockrill, J., Lewis, A., & Lindsay, G. (2000). Researching children’s perspectives: A psychological dimension. In A. Lewis, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Researching children’s perspecitives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313–321. doi:10.1080/07399339209516006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drew, I., & Sainsbury, R. (2010). Mode effects in qualitative interviews: A comparison of semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews using conversation analysis. Research Works. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York.
   Google Scholar
• Feveile, H., Olsen, O., & Hogh, A. (2007). A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: Response patterns in a survey. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 27. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1925106/pdf/1471-2288-7-27.pdf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, AT: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, P. (2012). Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: A research note. Qualitative Research, 12, 239–242. doi:10.1177/1468794111426607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Wood, J., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00231.x/full
   Google Scholar
• Im, E.-O., Liu, Y., Dormire, S., & Chee, W. (2008). Menopausal symptom experience: An online forum study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 541–550. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04624.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, N. L. (2009). Having their say: Email interviews for research data collection with people who have verbal communication impairment. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 161–172. doi:10.1080/13645570902752365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, N. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 963–976. doi:10.1080/01411920701657074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, N., & Busher, H. (2006). Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research, 6, 403–420. doi:10.1177/1468794106065010.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Croft.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, A., Peel, E., & Shaw, R. (2011). Online interviewing in psychology: Reflections on the process. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 354–369. doi:10.1080/14780887.2010.500352.
   Google Scholar
• Kazmer, M., & Xie, B. (2008). Qualitative interviewing in internet studies: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 257–278. doi:10.1080/13691180801946333.
   Google Scholar
• Kondracki, N. L., & Wellman, N. S. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, 224–230. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behaviour. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-O., & Lee, R. (2012). Methodological research on “sensitive” topics: A decade review. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 114(1), 35–49. doi:10.1177/0759106312437139.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. (1995). Children’s understanding of disability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meho, L. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57, 1284–1295. doi:10.1002/asi.20416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moloney, M., Strickland, O., Dietrich, A., & Myerburg, S. (2004). Online data collection in women’s health research: A study of perimenopausal women with migraines. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 16, 70–92. doi:10.1353/nwsa.2004.0080.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray, C. (2005). The social meanings of prosthesis use. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 425–441. doi:10.1177/1359105305051431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C., & Sixsmith, J. (2002). Qualitative health research via the internet: Practical and methodological issues. Health Informative Journal, 8, 47–53. doi:10.1177/146045820200800109.
   Google Scholar
• O’connor, H., & Madge, C. (2001). Cyber-mothers: Online synchronous interviewing using conferencing software. Sociological Research Online, 5. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/2/hine.html
   Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7, Article 11. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/175
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Duda, J., & McKenna, J. (2010). The menopausal transition in women who have had a hysterectomy: From embarrassment to liberation. Coventry: Midlands health psychology network Conference Coventry University.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Duda, J. & McKenna, J. (2011). Changing bodies: Women’s embodied experiences of the menopausal transition. Division of health psychology annual conference, British Psychological Society: University of Southampton, Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Duda, J. (2013). Changing bodies: Symptoms, body image, health and wellbeing over the menopausal transition. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, R., & Grogan, S. (2011). Women’s reasons for seeking breast reduction: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 31–41. doi:10.1177/1359105310367531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, W. (2001). In the flesh or online? Exploring qualitative research methodologies. Qualitative Research, 1, 147–168. doi:10.1177/146879410100100203.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (1995). The search for meanings: Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, K., & Vincent, J. (2011). Evaluation of an electronic interview with multimedia stimulus materials for gaining in-depth responses from professionals. Qualitative Research, 11, 605–624. doi:10.1177/1468794111413237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 7, 321–326. doi:10.1089/1094931041291295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25–29. doi:10.1037/h0071663.
   Google Scholar