Integrating critical realist and feminist methodologies: ethical and analytical dilemmas

References

• Allen, M. (2011). Violence and voice: Using a feminist constructivist grounded theory to explore women’s resistance to abuse. Qualitative Research, 11, 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2002). Encouraging participation: Ethics and responsibilities. In N. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 123–145). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, A., Hand, K., & Tovey, P. (2009). The role of gender, environment and individual biography in shaping qualitative interview data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 51–65.10.1080/13645570701606028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2004). Subjects of doubt: In search of the unsettled and unfinished. Paper prepared for CASCA Conference, London, Ontario, May 5‒9.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2006). The problem of agency in feminism: A critical realist approach. Gender and Education, 18, 309–324.10.1080/09540250600667892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Crinson, I. (2001). A realist approach to the analysis of focus group data. Paper presented at the 5th Annual IACR Conference, Roskilde University, Denmark, August 17‒19.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danieli, A., & Woddhams, C. (2007). Emancipatory research methodology and disability: A critique. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, P. J. (2001). Longitudinal case research: A critical realist perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14, 283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. (2002). ‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107–122). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Hughes, G. (2009). Inventing community safety. In P. Carlen (Ed.), Imaginary penalities (pp. 64–83). Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Mathner, M. (2002). Ethics and feminist research: Theory and practice. In N. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 123–145). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Sheptycki, J. (2009). Third wave criminology: Guns, crime and social order. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B. (2004). Family life and family support: A feminist analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B. (2006). Re-thinking family support in the current policy context. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (1984). ‘It’s great to have someone to talk to’: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell & H. Roberts (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70–87). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Fopp, R. (2008a). From weak social constructionism to critical realism in housing theory: Exploring issues. Paper presented to the Australian Housing Researchers Conference, RMIT, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Fopp, R. (2008b). Social constructionism and housing studies: A critical reflection. Urban Policy and Research, 26, 159–175.10.1080/08111140801898548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, M. (2002). Feminisms and cross-ideological feminist social research: Standpoint, situatedness and positionality – Developing cross-ideological feminist research. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 3, 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V., & Alldred, P. (2002). The ethics of intention: Research as a political tool. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 32–52). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. (2007). Open-ended interviews, power, and emotional labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36, 318–346.10.1177/0891241606293134
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. (2007). Emotions and research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10, 195–209.10.1080/13645570701541894
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, C., Nixon, J., & Parr, S. (2010). Mother abuse: A matter of youth justice, child welfare or domestic violence? Journal of Law and Society, 37, 264–284.10.1111/(ISSN)1467-6478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layder, D. (1989). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Letherby, G. (2002). Claims and disclaimers: Knowledge, reflexivity and representation in feminist research. Sociological Research Online, 6, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Letherby, G. (2003a). Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Letherby, G. (2003b). Reflections on where we are and where we want to be: Response to ‘Looking back and looking forward: Some recent feminist sociology reviewed’. Sociological Research Online, 8, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2006). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods (New ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, J., & Potter, G. (2001). After postmodernism: An introduction to critical realism. London: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. (2009). Beyond ‘so what?’ criminology: Rediscovering realism. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 341–362.10.1177/1362480609336497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (1998). Reflections on a voice-centred relational method of data analysis: Analysing maternal and domestic voices. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Private lives and public texts (pp. 119–144). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, J., & Hunter, C. (2009). Disciplining women and the governance of conduct. In A. Millie (Ed.), Securing respect: Behavioural expectations and anti-social behaviour in the UK (pp. 119–138). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, J., & Parr, S. (2006). ASB: Voices from the front line. In J. Flint (Ed.), Housing, urban governance and ASB: Perspectives, policy and practice (pp. 79–98). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, H. (1998). The politics of methodology in ‘post-medical geography’: Mental health research and the interview. Health & Place, 4, 341–353.10.1016/S1353-8292(98)00030-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, S. (2008). Family intervention projects: A site of social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, S. (2009). Confronting the reality of anti-social behaviour. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 363–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, S. (2011). Family policy and the governance of anti-social behaviour in the UK: Women’s experiences of intensive family support. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 717–737.10.1017/S0047279410000735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Respect Taskforce. (2006). Respect action plan. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21, 305–320.10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satsangi, M. (2013). Synthesizing feminist and critical realist approaches to housing studies. Housing Studies, 30, 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1997). Essentialism, social constructionism, and beyond. The Sociological Review, 45, 453–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2006). Parent education: Empowerment or control? Children and Society, 11, 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. (2005). Governing through evidence: Participation and power in policy evaluation. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 601–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, Y. (1984). Do-it-yourself social research. Melbourne: Victorian Council of Social Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wai-Chung Yeung, H. (1997). Critical realism and realist research in human geography: A method or a philosophy in search of a method. Progress in Human Geography, 21, 51–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C., Warrener, M., Reeves, A., & LaValle, I. (2008). Family intervention projects: An evaluation of their design, set-up and early outcomes. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar