Effects of screening questionnaires on response in a two-phase postal survey

References

• American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Retrieved from aapor.org/Content/NavigationMenu/AboutAAPOR/StandardsampEthics/StandardDefinitions/StandardDefinitions2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blumberg, S. J., & Luke, J. V. (2013). Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2012. National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bogen, K. (1996). The effect of questionnaire length on response rates: A review of the literature. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (pp. 1020–1025). Alexandria, Virginia: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J., Fleeman, A., Kennedy, C., Lewis, F., & Weiss, A. (2012). Sampling cell phone only households: A comparison of demographic and behavioral characteristics from ABS and cell phone samples. Survey Practice, 5. Retrieved from www.surveypractice.org
   Google Scholar
• Brick, J. M., Williams, D., & Montaquila, J. M. (2011). Address-based sampling for subpopulation surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 409–428.10.1093/poq/nfr023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2005). Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 87–98.10.1093/poq/nfi002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz de Rada, V. (2005). Influence of questionnaire design on response to mail surveys. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 61–78.10.1080/1364557021000025991
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Sinclair, M. D., & Clark, J. R. (1993). Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design, and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 289–304.10.1086/269376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S., Wentz, R., & Kwan, I. (2002). Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 324, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. (1993). Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, R., Cantave, M., Wasikowski, N., & Pens, Y. (2010). To mail or to call: How to reach the hard-to-reach. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R., Singer, E., & Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: Description and an illustration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 299–308.10.1086/317990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D., Cantor, D., Brick, P. D., Sigman, R., & Aponte, M. (2010). Findings from a two-phase mail survey for a study of veterans. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (pp. 2776–2782). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43, 446–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerwegh, D., Vanhove, T., Matthijs, K., & Loosveldt, G. (2003). The effect of personalization on response rates and data quality in web surveys. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Iannacchione, V. G. (2011). The changing role of address-based sampling in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 556–575.10.1093/poq/nfr017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, M. W., Daily, G., Shuttles, C. D., Yancey, T. L., & Bourquin, H. C. (2009). Building a new foundation: Transitioning to address-based sampling after 30 years of RDD. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Hollywood, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz, N. A., Brick, J. M., Stokes, L., Andrews, R. A., & Muzzy, S. (2010). A pilot test of a dual frame mail survey as an alternative to an RDD survey. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Montaquila, J. M., Brick, J. M., Williams, D., Kim, K., & Han, D. (2013). A study of two-phase mail survey data collection methods. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 1, 66–87.10.1093/jssam/smt004
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, L., Kalton, G. G., & Brick, J. M. (1996). A comparison of some weighting adjustment methods for panel nonresponse. Survey Methodology, 22, 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. (1982). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Kreuter, F., & Eckman, S. (2012). Motivated underreporting in screening interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 453–469.10.1093/poq/nfs033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Shapiro, G., Kearney, A., & Ernst, L. (1997). Who lives here? Survey undercoverage and household roster questions. Journal of Official Statistics, 13, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Ye, C. (2009). The framing of the survey request and panel attrition. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 338–348.10.1093/poq/nfp021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45, Part 46, Subpart D.; revised January 15, 2009. Retrieved May 30, 2014 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html
   Google Scholar
• Wenemark, M., Persson, A., Brage, H. N., Svensson, T., & Kristenson, M. (2011). Applying motivation theory to achieve increased response rates, respondent satisfaction, and data quality. Journal of Official Statistics, 27, 393–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar