Beyond anonymity: temporality and the production of knowledge in a qualitative longitudinal study

References

• Bishop, L. (2013). The value of moral theory for addressing ethical questions when reading qualitative data. Methodological Innovations Online (2013), 8, 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, H., Hudson, M., Parry, J., Sahin-Dikmen, M., Taylor, R. F., & Wilkinson, D. (2005). Ethnic minority outreach: An evaluation. London: DWP.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70, 4–28.10.1177/000312240507000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2006). Anonymising research data NCRM ( working paper series 7/06). Manchester: NCRM.
   Google Scholar
• Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2007). Exploring ‘quality’: Research participants’ perspectives on verbatim quotations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859948.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, J., O’Reilly, M., Taylor, H., & Dogra, N. (2007). Confidentiality and autonomy: The challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 264–275.10.1177/1049732306297884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer, A. (2009). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics, and practicalities. Pan, 12, 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Harden, J., Backett-Milburn, K., Hill, M., & MacLean, A. (2010). Oh, what a tangled web we weave: Experiences of doing ‘multiple perspectives’ research in families. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 441–452.10.1080/13645571003650979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., Holland, J., McGrelis, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (2012). Storying qualitative longitudinal research: Sequence, voice and motif. Qualitative Research, 12, 16–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. (2009). In defence of anonymity: Rejoining the criticism. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 431–445.10.1080/01411920802044438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, T., Alcorn, N., & O’Neill, J. (2013). Ethical issues in collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 21, 107–123.10.1080/09650792.2013.763448
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R. (2014). Unfolding tales of voluntary action: The boss. Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R., Arvidson, A., Edwards, S., Soteri-Proctor, A., Taylor, R., & Teasdale, S. (2011). First impressions: Introducing the ‘real times’ third sector case studies ( TSRC Working Paper 67). Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R., Taylor, R., Arvidson, M., Soteri Proctor, A., & Teasdale, S. (2013). The third sector in unsettled times: A field guide ( TSRC Working Paper 109). Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (2012). Reconfiguring research relationships: Regulation new technologies and doing ethical research. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 29–42). London: Sage.10.4135/9781473913912
   Google Scholar
• Moore, N. (2012). The politics and ethics of naming: Questioning anonymisation in (archival) research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 331–340.10.1080/13645579.2012.688330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, V., Boddy, J., & Lamb, R. (2014). The ethics of secondary data analysis: Learning from the experience of sharing qualitative data from young people and their families in an international study of childhood poverty ( NOVELLA Working Paper). Retrieved from http://www.younglives.org.uk/files/working-papers/novella_morrow-et-al_wp
   Google Scholar
• Neale, B. (2013). Adding time into the mix: Stakeholder ethics in qualitative longitudinal research. Methodological Innovations Online, 8, 6–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neale, B., & Bishop, L. (2012). The timescapes archive: A stakeholder approach to archiving qualitative longitudinal data. Qualitative Research, 12, 53–65.10.1177/1468794111426233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (2000). Anonymity and place in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 546–569.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M., Karim, K., Taylor, H., & Dogra, N. (2012). Parent and child views on anonymity: ‘I’ve got nothing to hide’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 211–223.10.1080/13645579.2011.576554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, O., & Mauthner, N. S. (2004). Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. Sociology, 38, 139–152.10.1177/0038038504039366
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. The Social Service Review, 16–39.10.1086/ssr.1993.67.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M. (2010). Identities and social change in Britain since 1940: The politics of method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587650.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., Arvidson, M., Macmillan, R., Soteri Proctor, A., & Teasdale, S. (2014). ‘What’s in it for us?’ Recruiting third sector organisations to a qualitative longitudinal study and maintaining relationships. In L. Camfield (Ed.), Research in international development: A critical review (pp. 38–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Hadfield, L., Holland, J., Henwood, K., Moore, N., Stanley, L., & Taylor, R. (2014). New frontiers in QLR: Definition design and display. Manchester: NCRM.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2003). Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 233–244.10.1080/1364557032000091833
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, L., & Woodthorpe, K. (2011). Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research, 11, 197–212.10.1177/1468794110394073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, P. (2000). Feminist approaches to a situated ethics. In H. Simons, & R. Usher (Eds.), Situated ethics in educational research (pp. 120–142). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoonard, W. (2003). Is anonymity an artefact in ethnographic research? Journal of Academic ethics, 1, 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R. (2013). What are qualitative research ethics? London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., & Boddy, J. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Research ethics in challenging contexts. Methodological Innovations Online, 8 (2), 1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiles, R., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Heath, S. (2006). Researching researchers: Lessons for research ethics. Qualitative Research, 6, 283–299.10.1177/1468794106065004
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., Crow, G., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2008). The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 417–428.10.1080/13645570701622231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar