The Goldilocks principle: applying the exclusive disjunction to fuzzy sets

References

• Arvind, T. T., & Stirton, L. (2010). Explaining the reception of the Code Napoleon in Germany: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Legal Studies, 30(1), 1–29.10.1111/lest.2010.30.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J., & Jacobsen, J. P. (2007). A human capital-based theory of postmarital residence rules. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 23, 208–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. L. (2011). Policy feedbacks and the impact of policy designs on public opinion. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36, 961–973.10.1215/03616878-1460542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damonte, A. (2014). Policy tools for green growth in the EU15: A qualitative comparative analysis. Environmental Politics, 23, 18–40.10.1080/09644016.2013.817759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1963/1980). Actions, reasons, and causes. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Essays on actions and events (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeli, I., & Rothmayr Allison, C. (2013). Diverging against all odds? Regulatory paths in embryonic stem cell research across Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 407–424.10.1080/13501763.2013.761509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18, 255–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2003). APD from a methodological point of view. Studies in American Political Development, 17, 82–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98, 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjolberg, M. (2009). The origin of corporate social responsibility: Global forces or national legacies? Socio-Economic Review, 7, 605–637.10.1093/ser/mwp017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400845446
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, U. (2015). But not both: The exclusive disjunction in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Quality and Quantity, 49, 75–92. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9975-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., & Smith, R. (2011). Still a house divided. Princeton studies in American politics: Historical, institutional, and comparative perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefeldt, E. (2012). Party and gender in Western Europe revisited: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of gender-balanced parliamentary parties. Party Politics, 18, 193–214.10.1177/1354068810380094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, M. D. (2012). Pathways out of homelessness in Los Angeles and Tokyo: Multilevel contexts of limited mobility amid advanced urban marginality. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, 980–1006.10.1111/ijur.2012.36.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2004). Good, bad or ugly? On the effects of fiscal rules with creative accounting. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordanini, A., & Maglio, P. P. (2009). Market orientation, internal process, and external network: A qualitative comparative analysis of key decisional alternatives in the new service development. Decision Sciences, 40, 601–625.10.1111/deci.2009.40.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, F. J., & Hartline, A. (2007). Ternary exclusive or. Logic Journal of IGPL, 16, 75–83.10.1093/jigpal/jzm027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2006a). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14, 291–310.10.1093/pan/mpj019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2006b). How to lure analytic social science out of the doldrums: Some lessons from comparative research. International Sociology, 21, 633–646.10.1177/0268580906067834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., & Sonnett, J. (2005). Between complexity and parsimony: Limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. In Sabine Kropp & Michael Minkenberg (Eds.), Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft [Comparison in political science] (pp. 180–197). Wiesbaden: Social Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology, 21, 679–706.10.1177/0268580906067836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Grimm, H. (Eds.). (2006). Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis: Beyond the quantitative–qualitative divide. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004244
   Google Scholar
• Stanko, M. A., & Olleros, X. (2013). Industry growth and the knowledge spillover regime: Does outsourcing harm innovativeness but help profit? Journal of Business Research, 66, 2007–2016.10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, K., & Muller, W. C. (1999). Policy, office, or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagemann, C., & Schneider, C. Q. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9, 397–418.
   Google Scholar