Embedding quantitative skills into the social science curriculum: case studies from Manchester

References

• Adeney, K., & Carey, S. (2011). How to teach the reluctant and terrified to love statistics: The importance of context in teaching quantitative methods in the social sciences. In G. Payne & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching quantitative methods: Getting the basics right (pp. 157–176). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. London: Kings College.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2012). UK sociology and quantitative methods: Are we as weak as they think? Or Are they barking up the wrong tree? Sociology, 46, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. (2011). Jorum: A national service for learning and teaching. In G. Payne & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching quantitative methods: Getting the basics right (pp. 157–176). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446268384
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. (2012). How OERs can help a strategically important and vulnerable subject area – Quantitative social science. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(2). doi: 10.5334/2012-16
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, M. J., Hillier, J., & Signoretta, P. (2014). Counting better? An examination of the impact of quantitative method teaching on statistical anxiety and confidence. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16, 51–66. doi:10.1177/1469787414558983
   Google Scholar
• Falkingham, J., & McGowan, T. (2011). Improving the teaching of quantitative methods to undergraduate social scientists: Understanding and overcoming the barriers. In G. Payne & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching quantitative methods: Getting the basics right (pp. 99–120). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hampden-Thompson, G., & Sundaram, V. (2013). Developing quantitative research skills and conceptualising an integrated approach to teaching research methods to education students. The AISHE-J: All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 5, 901–924.
   Google Scholar
• Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Van den Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 521–525). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., & London, C. (2010). Is the UK an outlier? London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Howery, C. B., & Havidan, R. (2006). Integrating data analysis (IDA): Working with sociology departments to address the quantitative literacy gap. Teaching Sociology, 34, 23–38.10.1177/0092055X0603400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnes, J. (2009). Final report: Proposals to support and improve the teaching of quantitative research methods at undergraduate level in the UK. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J., Dobson, A., Scott, S., Wyman, M., & Landén, A. S. (2008). International bench-marking review of best practice in the provision of undergraduate teaching in quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 1–91). Staffordshire: Keele University.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G., Williams, M., & Chamberlin, S. (2004). Methodological pluralism in British sociology. Sociology, 38, 153–163.10.1177/0038038504039372
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. (2012). Making them count: How effective has official encouragement of quantitative methods been in British sociology? Current Sociology, 60, 690–704. doi:10.1177/0011392112440438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J., & Barmby, P. (2012). Evaluation report on the realistic mathematics education pilot project at Manchester Metropolitan University. Durham. Retrieved from http://www.mei.org.uk/files/pdf/rme_evaluation_final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Slootmaeckers, K., Kerremans, B., & Adriaensen, J. (2014). Too afraid to learn: Attitudes towards statistics as a barrier to learning statistics and to acquiring quantitative skills. Politics, 34, 91–200. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12042
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Development of thinking and the formation of concepts in the adolescent. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 2, Chapter 2, pp. 29–81). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Wathan, J., Brown, M., & Williamson, L. (2011). Understanding and overcoming the barriers increasing secondary analysis in undergraduate dissertations. In J. Payne & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching quantitative methods: Getting the basics right (pp. 121–141). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446268384
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., Durrant, G., De Broe, S., & Powell, J. (2009). Methodological approaches at PhD and skills sought for research posts in academia: A mismatch? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 257–269. doi:10.1080/13645570701708550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Payne, G., Hodgkinson, L., & Poade, D. (2008). Does british sociology count? Sociology students’ attitudes toward quantitative methods. Sociology, 42, 1003–1021. doi:10.1177/0038038508094576
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Sutton, C. (2011). Challenges and opportunities for developing teaching in quantitative methods. In G. Payne & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching quantitative methods: Getting the basics right (pp. 66–84). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446268384
   Google Scholar