The discourse of QDAS: reporting practices of ATLAS.ti and NVivo users with implications for best practices

References

• Akre, C., Michaud, P., Berchtold, A., & Suris, J. (2010). Cannabis and tobacco use: Where are the boundaries? A qualitative study on cannabis consumption modes among adolescents. Health Education Research, 25, 74–82.10.1093/her/cyp027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Nahyan, M., Sohal, A., Fildes, B., & Hawas, Y. (2012). Transportation infrastructure development in the UAE: Stakeholder perspectives on management practice. Construction Innovation, 12, 492–514.10.1108/14714171211272234
   Google Scholar
• Bakos, A., Hutson, S., Loud, J., Peters, J., Giusti, R., & Greene, M. (2008). BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: A qualitative study of the BRCS-negative experience. Health Expectations, 11, 220–231.10.1111/hex.2008.11.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara, W., Miskon, S., & Fielt, E. (2011). A systematic, tool-supported method for conducting literature reviews in information systems. In V. Tuunainen, J. Nandhakumar, M. Rossi, & W. Soliman (eds.), Proceedings of the19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011). Finland: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Banfield, M., Gardner, K., McRae, I., Gillespie, J., Wells, R., & Yen, L. (2013). Unlocking information for coordination of care in Australia: A qualitative study of information continuity in four primary health care models. BMC Family Practice, 14, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basit, T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45, 143–154.10.1080/0013188032000133548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basto, E., Warson, E., & Barbour, S. (2012). Exploring American Indian adolescents’ needs through a community-driven study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 39, 134–142.10.1016/j.aip.2012.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulaurier, R., Seff, L., & Newman, F. (2008). Barriers to help-seeking for older women who experience intimate partner violence: A descriptive model. Journal of Women & Aging, 20, 231–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., Towsley, G., Berry, P., Lindau, K., Field, R., & Jensen, S. (2010). Core aspects of satisfaction with pain management: Cancer patients’ perspectives. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39, 100–115.10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birha, A., Godesso, A., Kebede, Y., & Gerbaba, M. (2013). Mothers’ experiences and satisfactions with health extension program in Jimma zone, Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 13. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringer, J., Johnston, L., & Brackenridge, C. (2004). Maximising transparency in a doctoral thesis: The complexities of writing about the use of QSR*NVivo within a grounded theory study. Qualitative Research, 4, 247–265.10.1177/1468794104044434
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, M., & Maclaren, P. (1998). Using computer software for the analysis of qualitative market research data. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipolletta, S., & Sperotto, A. (2012). From the hospital organisation to the childbirth practice: Italian women’s experiences. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 30, 326–336.10.1080/02646838.2012.707777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, L., Taylor, L., Chen, P., & Bradley, E. (2012). Experiences of leadership in health care in sub-Saharan Africa. Human Resources for Health, 10, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., & Skinner, H. (2010). I spy with my little eye: A comparison of manual versus computer-aided analysis of data gathered by projective techniques. Qualitative Market Research, 13, 441–459.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, A., Koko-Mhlahlo, K., & Senekal, M. (2005). Nutritional well-being of young children in Duncan Village, East London, South Africa: Accessibility of primary health care clinics. Public Health Nutrition, 8, 520–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembkowski, S., & Hammer-Lloyd, S. (1995). Computer applications – A new road to qualitative data analysis?European Journal of Marketing, 29, 50–62.10.1108/03090569510147613
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, R., Ritchie, J., & Siwale, J. (2006). Microfinance: Accountability from the grassroots. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 19, 405–427.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, J., Silver, C., Mruck, K., & Peeters, B., (2011). Introduction to the KWALON experiment: Discussions on qualitative data analysis software by developers and users. FORUM: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). Article 40. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1637
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N., & Lee, R. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N., & Lee, R. (2002). New patterns in the adoption and use of qualitative software. Field Methods, 14, 197–216.10.1177/1525822X02014002005
   Google Scholar
• Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2014). Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qualitative Research, 14, 341–352.10.1177/1468794113481790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonteyn, M., & Bauer-Wu, S. (2005). Using qualitative evaluation in a feasibility study to improve and refine a complementary therapy intervention prior to subsequent research. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 11, 247–252.10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.05.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friese, S. (2014).Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• García-Horta, J., & Guerra-Ramos, M. (2009). The use of CAQDAS in educational research: Some advantages, limitations and potential risks. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32, 151–165.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, H., & Sharma, M. (2012). University students’ understanding of thermal physics in everyday contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1119–1142.10.1007/s10763-011-9320-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L. S. (2002). Going the distance: 'closeness' in qualitative data analysis software. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L., Jackson, K., & di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: The history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 221–236). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
   Google Scholar
• Goble, E., Austin, W., Larsen, D., Kreitzer, L., & Brintnell, S. (2012). Habits of mind and split-mind effect: When computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software is used in phenomenological research. FORUM: Qualitative Social Research, 13. Article 2. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1709
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, A., McGowen, P., & Cooper, S. (2011). Developing quality in female high-technology entrepreneurs’ networks. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17, 588–606.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., & Butcher, L. (1996). Uses of qualitative data analysis software in educational research: The literature, the hard questions and some specific research applications. The Australian Educational Researcher, 23, 55–80.10.1007/BF03219631
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, R., & Koerber, A. (2011). Using NVivo to answer the challenges of qualitative research in professional communication: Benefits and best practices tutorial. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54, 68–82.10.1109/TPC.2009.2036896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, S., Claasens, L., Luchtenberg, A., Roodnat, J., Zuidema, W., Weimar, W., … Massey, E. (2013). Living donor kidney transplantation among ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: A model for breaking the hurdles. Patient Education & Counseling, 90, 118–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. (2014). The hidden role of Nvivo (and other QDAS) in dissertations. Paper presented at the 10th Annual International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, C., & McLaughlin, W. (2004). Communication in ecosystem management: A case study of cross-disciplinary integration in the assessment phase of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Environmental Management, 33, 591–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. (2006). Software and method: Reflections on teaching and using QSR NVivo in doctoral research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 379–391.10.1080/13645570600659433
   Google Scholar
• Kikooma, J. (2010). Using qualitative data analysis software in a social constructionist study of entrepreneurship. Qualitative Research Journal, 10, 40–51.10.3316/QRJ1001040
   Google Scholar
• Lalor, J., Casey, D., Elliot, N., Coyne, I., Comisky, C., Higgins, A., … Begley, C. (2013). Using case study within a sequential explanatory design to evaluate the impact of specialist and advanced practice roles on clinical outcomes: The SCAPE study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J., Parrish, R., Rupert, R., & Daniel, D. (2004). A living history – A qualitative study of experienced chiropractors treating visceral conditions.FORUM: Qualitative Social Research, 5. Article 17. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/567
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Wu, Z., Rou, K., Pang, L., Cao, X., Shoptaw, S., & Detels, R. (2010). Challenges in providing services in methadone maintenance therapy clinics in China: Service providers’ perceptions. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21, 173–178.10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (2011). A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Management, 31, 1252–1260.10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, K. (2005). More than just coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a discourse analysis of new texts. FORUM: Qualitative Social Research, 6. Article 25. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/28/59
   Google Scholar
• Mangabeira, W., Lee, R., & Fielding, N. (2004). Computers and qualitative research: Adoption, use, and representation. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 167–178.10.1177/0894439303262622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, H. (2002). Horses for courses: Facilitating postgraduate research students' choice of Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis. Contemporary Nurse, 13, 29–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meaney, S., Anweigi, L., Ziada, H., & Allen, F. (2012). The impact of hypodontia: A qualitative study on the experiences of patients. European Journal of Orthodontics, 34, 547–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morison, M., & Moir, J. (1998). The role of computer software in the analysis of qualitative data: Efficient clerk, research assistant or Trojan horse? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 106–116.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00768.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, A., Malhotra, M., & Ahire, S. (2011). Toward a theory of managing context in Six Sigma process-improvement projects: An action research investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 529–548.10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odena, O. (2013). Using software to tell a trustworthy, convincing and useful story. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 355–372.10.1080/13645579.2012.706019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passonneau, S., & Coffey, D. (2011). The role of synchronous virtual reference in teaching and learning: A grounded theory analysis of instant messaging transcripts. College and Research Libraries, 72, 276–295.10.5860/crl-102rl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M., Lester, J. N., & Britt, V. (2013). Constructing hopes and fears: A discourse analysis of introductory qualitative research texts. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(9), 637–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, J., Zwar, N., & Kemp, L. (2013). Advance care planning and interpersonal relationships: A two-way street. Family Practice, 30, 219–226.10.1093/fampra/cms063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, T. (2002). An intellectual history of NUD*IST and NVivo. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5, 199–214.10.1080/13645570210146267
   Google Scholar
• Robert, R., Zhukovsky, D. S., Mauricio, R., Gilmore, K., Morrison, S., & Palos, G. R. (2012). Bereaved parents' perspectives on pediatric palliative care. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 8(4), 316–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schrier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siccama, C., & Penna, S. (2008). Enhancing validity of a qualitative dissertation research study by using NVIVO. Qualitative Research Journal, 8, 91–103.10.3316/QRJ0802091
   Google Scholar
• Silver, C. (2010). Research design for longitudinal case-study project: Tracking the use of software in real projects using different methodologies. CAQDAS QUIC Working. Retrieved from https://www.surrey.ac.uk/sociology/research/researchcentres/caqdas/files/BriefingPaperResearchdesignforlongitudinalprojectFINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silver, C., & Lewins, A. (2014). Using software in qualitative research: A step by step guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sin, C. (2007). Using software to open up the ‘black box’ of qualitative data analysis in evaluations: The experience of a multi-site team using NUD*IST Version 6. Evaluation, 13, 110–120.10.1177/1356389007073684
   Google Scholar
• Tallerico, M. (1991). Applications of qualitative analysis software: A view from the field. Qualitative Sociology, 14, 275–285.10.1007/BF00989705
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, S., & Fox, J. (2011). Trapped in a toxic relationship: Comparing the views of women living with anorexia nervosa to those experiencing domestic violence. Journal of Gender Studies, 20, 31–41.10.1080/09589236.2011.542018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 181. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181. Available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357.10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837–851.10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. FORUM: Qualitative Social Research, 3. Article 26. Available online at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/865/1880
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, M., Dunn, A., & Sweeney, S. (2012). Analysis of the leading tourism journals 1999–2008. Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 1714–1718.10.1016/j.annals.2012.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P. & Macklin, R. (in press). Social Science Computing Review. doi: 10.1177/0894439315596311
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M., & Wickham, M. (2006). Methodological implications of software use: An empirical investigation of the impact of software programs on literature analysis using N6 and NVivo 7. Proceedings of the 2006 QUALIT Conference, Brisbane, 1–10.
   Google Scholar