Wild interdisciplinarity: ethnography and computer science

References

• Aston, M., & Bond, J. (1976). The landscape of towns. London: Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., Born, G., & Weszkalnys, G. (2008). Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37, 20–49.10.1080/03085140701760841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2012). Doing Design Ethnography. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., Housley, W., Williams, M., Sloan, L., & Williams, M. (2013). Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: Surrogacy, augmentation and re-orientation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 245–260.10.1080/13645579.2013.774185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth-Krebs, K., Reid, L., & Hunter, C. J. (2015). Home-ing in on domestic energy research: “House”, “home”, and the importance of ontology. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N., Hughes, K., Greenhalgh, J., & Sales, A. (2007). Accessing socially excluded people: Trust and the gatekeeper in the researcher-participant relationship. Sociological Research Online, 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. (2012). Research in the Wild 2012 Call for Expressions of Interest. Retrieved from http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/funding/calls/researchinthewild/
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D. 2013. ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly': Understanding Collaboration between the Social Sciences and the Life Sciences. Standing Committee for the Social Sciences Strategic Workshop Report. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W., Bowers, W., Kerridge, J., Boucher, T., & Jarvis, N., (2009) Anatomy of a Failure: How We Knew when Our Design Went Wrong, and What We Learned from It’. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2213–2222), New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M., (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2008). Delivering digital inclusion: An action plan for consultation. London: Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Horrigan, J. (2011). What are the consequences of being disconnected in a broadband-connected world? Daedalus, 140, 17–31.10.1162/DAED_a_00112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, D., Newport, C., Gray, R. S., Liu, J., Yuan, Y., & Elliott, C. (2004). Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions. Proceedings of MSWiM’04, 78–82. New York, NY: ACM.10.1145/1023663
   Google Scholar
• La Rue, F. (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (Human Rights Council). United Nations General Assembly, Seventeenth Session Agenda Item 3.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). Digital sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, C., Alpass, F., Flett, R., Lewis, K., Morriss, S., & Sligo, F. (2006). Crossing fields: The case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qualitative Research, 6, 131–149.10.1177/1468794106062706
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, L. (2015). Getting by: Estates, class and culture in Austerity Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meller, H. E. (1997). Towns, plans, and society in modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, D., & Ratcliffe, R. (2012). After method? Ethnography in the knowledge economy. Qualitative Research, 12, 147–164.10.1177/1468794111420902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nottingham City Council. (2012). Nottingham citizen’s survey 2012. Retrieved from http://www.nottinghaminsight.org.uk/d/91273
   Google Scholar
• Orton-Johnson, K., & Prior, N. (Eds.). (2013). Digital sociology: Critical perspectives. Housingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peneff, J. (1988). The observers observed: French survey researchers at work. Social Problems, 35, 520–535.10.2307/800613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., Svendsen, M. N., Koch, L., & Ehrich, K. (2010). How do we collaborate? Social science researchers’ experience of multidisciplinarity in biomedical settings. BioSocieties, 5, 278–286.10.1057/biosoc.2010.7
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. (2010). Identities and social change in Britain since 1940: The politics of method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587650.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. (2015). Sociology and the digital challenge. In P. Halfpenny & R. N. Procter (Eds.), Innovations in digital research methods  (pp. 297–310). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., & Bentley, R. (1992). Sociologists can be surprisingly useful in interactive system design. In People and computers VII : proceedings of HCI 92, (pp. 342–354), Cambridge University Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Spiller, K., Ball, K., Daniel, E., Dibb, S., Meadows, M., & Canhoto, A. (2015). Carnivalesque collaborations: Reflections on ‘doing’ multi-disciplinary research. Qualitative Research, 15, 551–567.10.1177/1468794114548946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 377–391.10.1177/00027649921955326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2004). Commons and borderlands: Working papers on interdisciplinarity, accountability and the flow of knowledge. Oxford: Sean Kingston Pub.
   Google Scholar
• TEDDINET. (2015). Energy Social Scientists in a Multidisciplinary Setting: Opportunities and Challenges. Retrieved from TEDDINET website: https://teddinet2.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/teddinet-energy-social-science-workshop_summary-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., Bloor, M., & Frankland, J. (2007). The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective. Qualitative Research, 7(4), 429–446.
   Google Scholar
• Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Egglestone, S., Humble, J., Greenhalgh, C., & Rodden, T. (2010). Digital plumbing: The mundane work of deploying UbiComp in the home. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 181–196.10.1007/s00779-009-0260-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar