Recruiting young people to sensitive research: turning the ‘wheels within wheels’

References

• Agbebiyi, A. (2013). Tiers of gatekeepers and ethical practice: Researching adolescent students and sexually explicit online material. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 535–540.10.1080/13645579.2013.823290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, P. (2004). Ethics. In S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett, & C. Robinson (Eds.), Doing research with children and young people (pp. 97–112). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allmark, P., Boote, J., Chambers, E., Clarke, A., McDonnell, A., Thompson, A., & Tod, A. M. (2009). Ethical issues in the use of in-depth interviews: Literature review and discussion. Research Ethics Review, 5, 48–54. doi: 10.1177/174701610900500203
   Google Scholar
• Billo, E., & Hiemstra, N. (2013). Mediating messiness: Expanding ideas of flexibility, reflexivity, and embodiment in fieldwork. Gender, Place & Culture, 20, 313–328. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2012.674929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, G. H., & Christ, A. E. (2006). Current approaches to helping children cope with a parent’s terminal illness. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 56, 197–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T. (2011). Gaining and maintaining access: Exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationship between gatekeepers and researchers. Qualitative Social Work, 10, 485–502. doi: 10.1177/1473325009358228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, S. (2014). Death wears a T-shirt – Listening to young people talk about death. Mortality, 19, 284–302. doi: 10.1080/13576275.2014.916257
   Google Scholar
• Copp, G., & Field, D. (2002). Open awareness and dying: The use of denial and acceptance as coping strategies by hospice patients. Nursing Times Research, 7, 118–127. doi: 10.1177/136140960200700206
   Google Scholar
• Crowhurst, I. (2013). The fallacy of the instrumental gate? Contextualising the process of gaining access through gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 463–475.10.1080/13645579.2013.823282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7, 327–353. doi: 10.1177/1468794107078515
   Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences: Managing boundaries, emotions and risks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511545481
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (2013). Power and trust: An academic researcher’s perspective on working with interpreters as gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 503–514. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2013.823276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmberger, E., Bolund, C., & Lützén, K. (2005). Experience of dealing with moral responsibility as a mother with cancer. Nursing Ethics, 12, 253–262.10.1191/0969733005ne787oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearnley, R. (2010). Death of a parent and the children’s experience: Don’t ignore the elephant in the room. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24, 450–459.10.3109/13561820903274871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabb, J. (2010). Home truths: Ethical issues in family research. Qualitative Research, 10, 461–478. doi: 10.1177/1468794110366807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, C., Barnes, S., Small, N., Gott, M., Payne, S., Seamark, D., & Halpin, D. (2010). Reconciling informed consent and ‘do no harm’: Ethical challenges in palliative-care research and practice in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Palliative Medicine, 24, 469–472.10.1177/0269216310367536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, V., & Robinson, Y. (2012). Developing creative research methods with challenging pupils. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 161–173. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2012.649407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2004). Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2007). Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens: Negotiating consent in child- and youth-orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 403–417. doi: 10.1080/01411920701243651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highet, G., & Jamieson, L. (2007). Cool with change: Young people and family change ( Scotland’s Families/CRFR). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2799
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L., & Highet, G. (2013). Troubling loss? Children’s experience of major disruptions in family life. In J. Ribbens McCarthy, C. Hooper, & V. Gillies (Eds.), Family troubles? Exploring changes and challenges in the family lives of children and young people (pp. 135–150). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, A. (2015). Positioning and subjectivation in research interviews: Why bother talking to a researcher? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 27–39. doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.845711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, M., Harris, F., Boyd, K., Sheikh, A., Murray, S. A., Brown, D., … Worth, A. (2007). Key challenges and ways forward in researching the “good death”: Qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study. BMJ, 334, 521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, V. L. (2008). Children’s experiences of parental advanced cancer ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from EThOS (479060).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, V. L., & Lloyd-Williams, M. (2009). How children cope when a parent has advanced cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 886–892. doi: 10.1002/pon.1455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy-macfoy, M. (2013). ‘It’s important for the students to meet someone like you.’ How perceptions of the researcher can affect gaining access, building rapport and securing cooperation in school-based research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 491–502. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2013.823294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, E., Broom, A., Good, P., Wootton, J., & Adams, J. (2014). Families and the transition to specialist palliative care. Mortality, 19, 323–341. doi: 10.1080/13576275.2014.916258
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. (2009). Recruiting parents and children into a research project: A qualitative exploration of families’ decision-making processes. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 405–419. doi: 10.1080/13645570802289104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAreavey, R. & Das, C. (2013). A delicate balancing act: Negotiating with gatekeepers for ethical research when researching minority communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 113–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, O. (2016). Repositioning the research encounter: Exploring power dynamics and positionality in youth research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., & Bell, L. (2012). Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’ consent. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 61–75). London: Sage.10.4135/9781473913912
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M., & Jessop, J. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.10.4135/9781473913912
   Google Scholar
• Notko, M., Jokinen, K., Malinen, K., Harju-Veijola, M., Kouronen, M., & Pirskanen, H. (2013). Encountering ethics in studying challenging family relations. Families, Relationships and Societies, 2, 395–408.10.1332/204674313X665085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. (2011). Long-term impact of childhood bereavement. Preliminary analysis of the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70). London: Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., & Kinsella, E. (2013). Picture this … safety, dignity, and voice – Ethical research with children. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 81–90.10.1177/1077800412462987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, K. (2012). Procedure versus process: Ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research. BMC Medical Ethics, 13, 25–36.10.1186/1472-6939-13-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, S. (2012). Hidden struggles of fieldwork: Exploring the role and use of field diaries. Emotion, Space and Society, 5, 86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2010.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, C. L. (2010). A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research, 10, 315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, N., Ingleton, C., Gardiner, C., & Gott, M. (2013). Awareness contexts revisited: Indeterminacy in initiating discussions at the end-of-life. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 2654–2664.10.1111/jan.2013.69.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, N. M., Gardiner, C., Ingleton, C., & Gott, M. (2014). How do patients respond to end-of-life status? Nursing Times, 110, 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sanghera, G. S., & Thapar-Björkert, S. (2008). Methodological dilemmas: Gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 543–562. doi: 10.1080/01419870701491952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scourfield, P. (2012). Defenders against Threats or Enablers of Opportunities: The Screening Role Played by Gatekeepers in Researching Older People in Care Homes. The Qualitative Report, 17, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, J., Payne, S., Reid, D., Sargeant, A., Skilbeck, J., & Smith, P. (2005). Ethical and methodological issues in palliative care studies: The experiences of a research group. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10, 169–188. doi: 10.1177/174498710501000206
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S., & Read, S. (2011). Accessing vulnerable research populations: An experience with gatekeepers of ethical approval. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 17, 14–18.10.12968/ijpn.2011.17.1.14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward, R., & Campbell, S. (2013). An ethics journey: Ethical Governance of social research with vulnerable adults and the implications for practice. In M. Carey & L. Green (Eds.), Practical social work ethics: Complex dilemmas within applied social care (pp. 151–170). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, J. (2011). Ethical mindfulness and reflexivity: Managing a research relationship with children and young people in a 14-year qualitative longitudinal research (QLR) study. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 805–814.10.1177/1077800411423196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2007). ‘When you have children, you’re obliged to live’: Motherhood, chronic illness and biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 610–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01008.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyn, J., & White, R. (1997). Rethinking youth. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar