Incorporating intersectionality into research design: an example using qualitative interviews

References

• Acker, J. (2006). Class questions: Feminist answers. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L., & Collins, P. H. (2001). Race, class, and gender: An anthology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Baca Zinn, M., & Dill, B. T. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331.10.2307/3178416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baca Zinn, M., Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Messner, M. A. (2005). Introduction: Sex and gender through the prism of difference. In M. Baca Zinn, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Gender through the prism of difference (3rd ed., pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Silva, E. (2001). White supremacy and racism in the post-civil rights era. Boulder, CO: Lynee Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Bowleg, L. (2008). When black + lesbian + woman ≠ black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325.10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality: Theory, application, and praxis. Signs, 38, 785–810.10.1086/669608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28, 129–149.10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. D., & Qvotrup Jensen, S. (2012). Doing intersectional analysis: Methodological implications for qualitative research. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20, 109–125.10.1080/08038740.2012.673505
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a new vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex, & Class, 1, 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 137–197.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Cuadraz, G. H., & Uttal, L. (1999). Intersectionality and in-depth interviews: Methodological strategies for analyzing race, class, and gender. Race, Gender, & Class, 6, 156–186.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85.10.1177/1464700108086364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demos, V., & Lemelle, A. J., Jr. (2006). Introduction: Race, gender, and class for what? Race, Gender & Class, 13, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106–127.10.1177/0891243206293577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 230–243.10.1177/1065912910379227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, E. N. (2002). Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American citizenship and labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, L. (2007). Manifest destinies: The making of the Mexican American race. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, P. B. (1997). The categorical meaning of Spanish American identity among blue-collar New Mexicans, circa 1983. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 123–136.10.1177/07399863970192002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnois, C. E. (2013). Feminist measures in survey research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452269955
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. G. (2006). Privilege, power, and difference (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (2008). The gendered society (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, S., Zstenross, B., & McMahon, M. (1994). Privileging fieldwork over interviews: Consequences for identity and practice. Symbolic Interaction, 17, 37–50.10.1525/si.1994.17.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, B. (2007). The methodology of intersectional analysis: Qualitative approaches. In B. Landry (Ed.), Race, gender, and class: Theory and methods of analysis (pp. 105–118). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, P. (2001). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women’s studies. In M. L. Andersen & P. H. Collins (Eds.), Race, class, and gender: An anthology (4th ed., pp. 95–105). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, J. (2003). Race, ethnicity and sexuality: Intimate intersections, forbidden frontiers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1–15.10.1057/fr.2008.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From 1960s to 1990s (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ore, T. E. (2009). The social construction of difference and inequality: Race, class, gender, and sexuality (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pyke, K. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2003). Asian American women and racialized femininities: ‘Doing’ gender across cultural worlds. Gender & Society, 17, 33–53.10.1177/0891243202238977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. D. (2012). Race migrations: Latinos and the cultural transformation of race. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, P. S. (2004). Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer, 59, 10–21.10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, L. (2001). Understanding race, class, gender, and sexuality: A conceptual framework. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9, 8–37.10.1177/089124395009001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, A. (2012). The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar