Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study

References

• Agar, M., & MacDonald, J. (1995). Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organization, 54, 78–86.10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, T., Johnson, G., & Walther, J. (1993). Understanding communications processes in focus groups. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 51–64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483349008
   Google Scholar
• Aldag, L., & Tinsley, A. (1994). A comparison of focus group interviews to in-depth interviews in determining food choice influences. Journal of Agricultural and Food Information, 2, 89–96.10.1300/J108v02n03_11
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C. (1989). Individual interviews. In S. Robson & A. Foster (Eds.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 47–57). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, M. (1995). Comment: Concerns in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 487–495.10.1177/104973239500500409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, M., Stamm, T., Stucki, G., & Cieza, A. (2012). Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of two qualitative methods. Quality of Life Research, 21, 359–370.10.1007/s11136-011-9943-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deJong, M., & Schellens, P. (1998). Focus groups or individual interviews?: A comparison of text evaluation approaches. Technical Communication, 45, 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggleby, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research, 15, 832–840.10.1177/1049732304273916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern, E. (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: The effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 1–13.10.2307/3151525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. E., & McDonald, S. S. (1987). The group depth interview: Principles and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, T. (2003). The gold standard? why the focus group deserves to be the most respected of all qualitative research tools. Quirk’s Marketing Research Review, 17, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. (1993). The voice of the customer. Marketing Science, 12, 1–27.10.1287/mksc.12.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heary, C., & Hennessy, E. (2006). Focus groups versus individual interviews with children: A comparison of data. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 27, 58–68.10.1080/03033910.2006.10446228
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412986120
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, A., Howlett, E., Brady, D., & Drennan, J. (2005). The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 2588–2599.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M. (2000). Statistical analysis of sensitive topics in group and individual interviews. Quality & Quantity, 34, 419–431.10.1023/A:1004844425448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M., & Hoehn, J. (2001). Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? Ecological Economics, 36, 237–247.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, P., & Parshall, M. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 293–308.10.1177/104973200129118453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16, 103–121.10.1111/shil.1994.16.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483349008
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, E., MacQueen, K., & Neidig, J. (2003). Beyond the qualitative interview: Data preparation and transcription. Field Methods, 15, 63–84.10.1177/1525822X02239573
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412984287
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1998). Planning focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483328171
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D., & Krueger, R. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483349008
   Google Scholar
• Namey, E., Guest, G., McKenna, K., & Chen, M. (2016). Evaluating bang for the buck: a cost-effectiveness comparison between individual interviews and focus groups based on thematic saturation levels. American Journal of Evaluation, 37, 425–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nunkoosing, K. (2005). The problems with interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 698–706.10.1177/1049732304273903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCORI. (2015). PCORI – Funding opportunities. Retrieved October 16, 2015, from http://www.pcori.org/funding-opportunities
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R., & Single, H. (1996). Focus groups. International Journal of Qualitative Health Care, 8, 499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis Software (Version 10). Doncaster: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rat, A., Pouchot, J., Guillemin, F., Baumann, M., Retel-Rude, N., Spitz, E., & Coste, J. (2007). Content of quality-of-life instruments is affected by item-generation methods. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 390–398.10.1093/intqhc/mzm040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (1999). The use of focus group methodology: With selected examples from sexual health research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 905–913.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00966.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal, D., Bogart, L., & Ehrhardt, A. (1998). Small group dynamics: The utility of focus group discussions as a research method. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 253–266.10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.253
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D., & Bergin, R. (2006). Methodology or methodolatry? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 9, 26–37.10.1108/13522750610640530
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., MacMillan, J., McColl, E., Hale, C., & Bond, S. (1995). Comparison of focus group and individual interview methodology in examining patient satisfaction with nursing care. Social Sciences in Health, 1, 206–220.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, D. (1994). Boys’ thoughts and talk about sex in a working class locality of Glasgow. Sociological Review, 42, 703–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wutich, A., Lant, T., White, D., Larson, K., & Gartin, M. (2010). Comparing focus group and individual responses on sensitive topics: A study of water decision makers in a desert city. Field Methods, 22, 88–110.10.1177/1525822X09349918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar