Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Research Methodology Volume 21, 2018 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
12,704
Views
104
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Co-production: towards a utopian approach

David M. BellSchool of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Kate PahlSchool of Education, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Pages 105-117 | Received 05 May 2016, Accepted 23 Jun 2017, Published online: 10 Aug 2017

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Ahmed, S. (2015). Against students. Retrieved from https://thenewinquiry.com/essays/against-students/
  • Amsler, S. (2015). Education for radical democracy. London: Routledge.
  • Autonomous Geographies Research Collective. (2010). Beyond scholar activism: Making strategic interventions inside and outside the neoliberal university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 9, 245–275.
  • Banks, S., with Armstrong, A., Booth, M., Brown, G., Carter, K., Clarkson, M., … Russell, A. (2014). Using co-inquiry to study co-inquiry: Community-university perspectives on research. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 7, 37–47.
  • Barker, A. (2010). Co-production of local public services. Local Authorities & Research Councils’ Initiative. Retrieved July 11, 2017, from https://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/innovation/larci/co-production-summaryreport-pdf 11th July 2017.
  • Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2007). Practice as research. Chippenham: I.B. Tauris and Co.
  • Basole, A. (2009). Eurocentrism, the university, and multiple sites of knowledge production. In Edu- Factory Collective (Eds.), Towards a global autonomous university: Cognitive labor, the production of knowledge, and exodus from the education factory (pp. 32–38). New York, NY: Autonomedia.
  • Bastian, M. (2013). Why more-than-human participatory research?. Retrieved from https://www.morethanhumanresearch.com/home/why-more-than-human-participatory-research/
  • Beebeejaun, Y., Durose, C., Rees, J., Richardson, J., & Richardson, L. (2014). ‘Beyond text’: Exploring ethos and method in co-producing research with communities. Community Development Journal, 49, 37–53.10.1093/cdj/bst008
  • Beebeejaun, Y., Durose, C., Rees, J., Richardson, J., & Richardson, L. (2015) Public harm or public value? Towards co-production in research with communities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 552–56510.1068/c12116
  • Bell, D. (2017). Rethinking Utopia: Place, power, affect. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bhopal, K., & Preston, J. (Eds.). (2012). Intersectionality and “race” in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope. (N. Plaice, S. Plaice, & P. Knight, Trans.). Oxford: Basil blackwell.
  • Bloch, E. (1988). Can hope be disappointed? In W. Hamacher & D. E. Wellbery (Eds.), Literary Essays. (A. Joron, Trans.). (pp. 339–344). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Brodsky, A., & Nalebuff, R. K. (Eds.). (2015). The feminist utopia project: Fifty-seven visions of a wildly better future. New York, NY: The Feminist Press.
  • Burnett, J. (2007). Britian’s ‘civilising project’: Community cohesion and core values. Policy & Politics, 35, 353–357.10.1332/030557307780713004
  • Caffentzis, G. (2010). University struggles at the end of the edu-deal. Retrieved from https://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/university-struggles-end-edu-deal
  • Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Campbell, E., & Lassier, E. L. (2015). Doing ethnography today: Theories, methods, exercises. London: Sage.
  • Campbell, H., Vanderhoven, D., with Chatterton, P., Dyson, A., Irvine, A., Lupton, R., … Webber, M. (2016). Knowledge that matters: Realising the potential of co-production. Manchester, NH: N8 Research Partnership.
  • Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. (2008). ‘Nothing about us without us’: Greater, meaningful involvement of people who use illegal drugs: A public health, ethical, and human Rights imperative. Toronto: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, International HIV/AIDS Alliance, Open Society Institute.
  • Charlesworth, S., Baines, D., & Cunningham, I. (2015). ‘If i had a family, there is no way that i could afford to work here’: Juggling paid and unpaid care work in social services. Gender, Work & Organization, 22, 596–613.10.1111/gwao.v22.6
  • Charlton, J. I. (2000). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkerley: University of California Press.
  • Coessens, K., Crispin, D., & Douglas, A. (2009). The artistic turn: A manifesto. Ghent: The Orpheus Institute.
  • Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds.). (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of action research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446294406
  • Corbett, S., & Walker, A. (2013). The big society: Rediscovery of ‘the social’ or rhetorical fig-leaf for neo-liberalism? Critical Social Policy, 33, 451–472.10.1177/0261018312471162
  • Coté, M., Day, R. F. J., & de Peuter, G. (Eds.). (2006). Utopian pedagogy: Radical experiments against neoliberal globalization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Davies, W. (2014). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473906075
  • Davies, W. (2016). The new neoliberalism. New Left Review, 101, 121–134.
  • Davis, L. (2012). History, prolitics, and utopia: Toward a synthesis of social theory and practice. In M. Marder & P. Vieira (Eds.), Existential utopia: New perspectives on utopian thought (pp. 127–140). London: Continuum.
  • de Peuter, G., & Hall, S. (2007). Universities, intellectuals, and multitudes: An interview with Stuart Hall. In M. Coté, R. F. J. Day, & G. de Peuter (Eds.), Utopian pedagogy: Radical experiments against neoliberal globalization (pp. 108–128). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Diprose, K. (2015). Resilience is futile. Soundings, 58, 44–56.10.3898/136266215814379736
  • Durose, C., & Richardson, R. (Eds.). (2016). Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2016). Creating living knowledge: The connected communities programme, community–university partnerships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge. Bristol: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
  • Focus E15. (2016). New research paper about Focus E15: A nomadic war machine? Retrieved from https://focuse15.org/2016/04/11/new-research-paper-about-focus-e15-a-nomadic-war-machine/
  • Genest, G. B. (2016). The body as resistance art/ifact: Disability activism during the 2012 Quebec student movement. In C. Kelly & M. Orsini (Eds.), Mobilizing metaphor: Art, culture and disability activism in Canada (pp. 260–278). Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Geoghegan, V. (2007). Political theory, Utopia, post-secularism. In T. Moylan & R. Baccolini (Eds.), Utopia method vision: The use value of social dreaming (pp. 69–86). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Gilbert, J. (2013). What kind of thing is ‘neoliberalism’? New Formations, 80, 7–22.10.3898/nEWF.80/81.IntroductIon.2013
  • Gill, R., & Pratt, A. C. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.10.1177/0263276408097794
  • Gordon, A. (2014). On ‘lived theory’: An interview with A. Sivanandan. Race and Class, 55(4), 1–7.
  • Grosz, E. (2001). Embodied utopias: The time of architecture. In E. Grosz (Ed.), Architecture from the outside: Essays on virtual and real space (pp. 131–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Grove, K. (2013). On resilience politics: From transformation to subversion. Resilience, 1, 146–153.10.1080/21693293.2013.804661
  • Hall, S. (2011). The neo-liberal revolution. Cultural Studies, 25, 705–728.10.1080/09502386.2011.619886
  • Hall, S., & O’Shea, A. (2013). After neoliberalism: Analysing the present. Soundings, 55, 8–24.10.3898/136266213806045656
  • Harding, S. (2015). Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.001.0001
  • Hart, A., Davies, C., Aumann, K., Wenger, E., Aranda, K., Heaver, B., & Wolff, D. (2013). Mobilising knowledge in community–university partnerships: What does a community of practice approach contribute? Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 8, 278–291.10.1080/21582041.2013.767470
  • Hayman, R. (2012). The time is ripe for collaboration: Co-produced research is needed by academics and NGOs to demonstrate impact. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/09/28/collaborating-with-academics-hayman/
  • Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 1464–5300.
  • International Sex Worker Harm Reduction Caucus. (2008). Statement prepared for the international harm reduction association’s 19th conference harm reduction. Retrieved from https://www.sexworkeurope.org/es/news/icrse-past-articles/update-sex-worker-harm-reduction-caucus-statement
  • Isaacson, J. (2016). The ballerina and the bull: Anarchist utopias in the age of finance. London: Repeater Books.
  • James, S., & Dalla Costa, M. (1972). The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
  • Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeology of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions. London: Verso.
  • Janes, J. (2016). Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power and community-based action research. Action Research, 14, 72–87.10.1177/1476750315579129
  • Just Space. (2013). How to get the most from collaboration between community & activist groups & university staff & students. Retrieved from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/urbanlab/research/urban-pamphleteer/JustSpace_toprint.pdf
  • Kagan, S. (2014). The practice of ecological art [plastik]. Retrieved from https://art-science.univ-paris1.fr/plastik/document.php?id=866
  • Kamat, S. (2004). The privatization of public interest: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy, 11, 155–176.10.1080/0969229042000179794
  • Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community + communication in modern art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Kindon, S. (2003) Participatory video in geographic research: A feminist practice of looking? Area, 35, 142–153.10.1111/area.2003.35.issue-2
  • Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). (Eds.). Participatory action research approaches and methods. London: Routledge.
  • Ko, D. (2005). Bodies in utopia and utopian bodies in Imperial China. In J. Rüsen, M. Fehr, & T. Rieger (Eds.), Thinking utopia: Steps into other worlds (pp. 89–103). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2004). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? In G. Ladson-Billings & D. Gilborn (Eds.), The Routledge-falmer reader in multicultural education (pp. 49–63). London: Routledge.
  • Lauder, H. (2014). Research impact: How academics can grab policy makers’ attention. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2014/nov/11/academics-grab-policy-makers-attention
  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Levitas, R. (2005). The inclusive society? Social exclusion and new labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137314253
  • London Tenants Federation, Loretta Less, Just Space and Southwark Notes Archive Group. (2014). Staying put: An anti-gentrification handbook for council estates in London. Retrieved from https://southwarknotes.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/staying-put-web-version-low.pdf
  • Martínez, E., & García, A. (2000). What is neoliberalism? A brief definition for activists. Retrieved from https://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376
  • McGarry, O. (2016). Repositioning the research encounter: Exploring power dynamics and positionality in youth research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 339–354. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1011821
  • McIntyre, A. (2000). Inner-city kids: Adolescents confront life and violence in an urban community. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Mirga-Kruszelnicka, A. (2015). Nothing about us without us? Roma participation in policy making and knowledge production. Retrieved from https://www.errc.org/article/roma-rights-2-2015-nothing-about-us-without-us-roma-participation-in-policy-making-and-knowledge-production/4433/6
  • Mirowski, P. (2014). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso.
  • Moylan, T. (2008). Making the present impossible: On the vocation of utopian science fiction. Arena, 31, 79–108.
  • Moylan, T. (2014). Demand the impossible: Science fiction and the utopian imagination. Oxford: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0353-0610-1
  • Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Nirta, C. (2016). Actualized utopias: The here and now of transgender. Politics & Gender. doi:10.1017/S1743923X1600043X
  • Oksala, J. (2013). Feminism and neoliberal governmentality. Foucault Studies, 16, 32–53.
  • Openjuru, G., Jaitli, N., Tandon, R., & Hall, B. (2015). Despite knowledge democracy and community-based participatory research voices from the global south and excluded north still missing. Action Research, 13, 219–229.10.1177/1476750315583316
  • Orloff, A. S. (2002). Women's employment and welfare regimes: Globalization, export orientation and social policy in Europe and North America. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
  • Orr, K., & Bennett, M. (2012). Let’s get together: The hidden politics of ‘co-production’ in research. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/jul/18/politics-coproduction-research-academics-practitioners
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  • Pahl, K., & Pool, S. (2017). Can we Fast Foward to the Good bits? In S. Malik, C. Chapain, & R. Comunian (Eds.), Community filmmaking: diversity, practices and places (pp. 245–262). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Perry, B., & May, T. (2015). Lessons on the research practice relationship: From critique to co-production in Manchester. In M. Polk (Ed.), Co-producing knowledge for sustainable cities: Joining forces for change (pp. 98–122). London: Routledge.
  • Phipps, A. (2014). The politics of the body: Gender in a neoliberal and neoconservative age. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Preser, R. (2016). A methodology of damage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 17–30.10.1080/13645579.2014.931202
  • Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822390442
  • Rasool, Z. (2015, September). Emotions in community research. Paper presented at the Huddersfield ‘Imagine’ Conference, University of Huddersfield.
  • Rasool, Z. (2017). Collaborative working practices: Imagining better research partnerships. Research for All, 1, 310–322. doi:10.18546/RFA.01.1.08
  • Ravetz, J., & Ravetz, A. (2016). Seeing the wood from the trees: Social Science 3.0 and the role of visual thinking. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science, 30, 104–120.
  • Sargisson, L. (1996). Contemporary feminist utopianism. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Sargisson, L. (2012). Fool’s gold: Utopianism in the twenty-first century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137031075
  • Taylor, M. (2014). ‘Being useful’ after the ivory tower: Combining research and activism with the Brixton pound. Area, 46, 305–312.10.1111/area.12117
  • Thompson, E. (2011). William Morris: Romantic to revolutionary. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
  • Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2007). Participatory art: Capturing spatial vocabularies in a collaborative visual methodology with Melanie Carvalho and South Asian women in London, UK. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 132–140). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Tyler, I., Gill, N., Conlon, D., & Oeppen, C. (2014). The business of child detention: Charitable co-option, migrant advocacy and activist outrage. Race and Class, 56, 3–21.10.1177/0306396814531690
  • Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: For an analysis of contemporary forms of life. (I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito, & A. Casson, Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
  • Vitale, A. (2017). The end of policing. London: Verso.
  • Weeks, K. (2011). The problem with work: Feminism, marxism, antiwork politics and postwork imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394723

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.