Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: reflections from a U.K.-based case study

References

• Banks, S., Armstrong, A. (2014). Using co-inquiry to study co-inquiry: Community-university perspectives on research. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 7, 37. Retrieved from http://jces.ua.edu/using-co-inquiry-to-study-co-inquiry-community-university-perspectives-on-research/
   Google Scholar
• Barter, C., McCarry, M., Berridge, D., & Evans, K. (2009). Partner exploitation and violence in teenage intimate relationships: Executive summary. NSPCC. Retrieved from https://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/partner-exploitation-violence-teenage-intimate-relationships-summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y., Durose, C., Rees, J., Richardson, J., & Richardson, L. (2015). Public harm or public value? Towards coproduction in research with, communities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 552–565.10.1068/c12116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, K., Warr, D., Gibbs, L., & Riggs, E. (2013). Addressing ethical and methodological challenges in research with refugee-background young people: Reflections from the field. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26, 69–87.10.1093/jrs/fes002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1996). Understanding. Theory, Culture & Society, 13, 17–37.10.1177/026327696013002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, D. (2003). Research for sale: Moral market or moral maze? Fiction written under oath? Essays in philosophy and educational research (pp. 153–170). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brigstocke, J. (2013). Democracy and the reinvention of authority. In T. Noorani, C. Blencowe, & J. Brigstocke (Eds.), Problems of participation: Reflections on authority, democracy, and the struggle for common life (pp. 7–12). Lewes: Authority Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Brigstocke, J., & Noorani, T. (n.d.). Literature survey on participation, authority and performance. Authority Research Network. Retrieved from https://www.authorityresearch.net/uploads/8/9/4/1/8941936/literature_review_master_website.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bristol City Council. (2016). Knowle statistical ward profile 2016. Retrieved from https://www.bristol.gov.uk/documents/20182/436737/Knowle.pdf/5cea8261-01e0-4b6d-ae68-19429740ae82
   Google Scholar
• Carter, K., Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Kindon, S., & Burkett, I. (2013). Issues of disclosure and intrusion: Ethical challenges for a community researcher. Ethics and Social Welfare, 7, 92–100.10.1080/17496535.2013.769344
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T. S., Teram, E., & Shaw, I. (2017). Balancing methodological rigor and the needs of research participants: A debate on alternative approaches to sensitive research. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 260–270.10.1177/1049732315605272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M. (1986). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 2–29.10.1111/soin.1986.56.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. (1998). The importance of mess in action research. Educational Action Research, 6, 93–109.10.1080/09650799800200047
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. (2009). The purpose of mess in action research: Building rigour though a messy turn. Educational Action Research, 17, 277–291.10.1080/09650790902914241
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, B. (2009). Feeling my way into story space: Lessons for research from storyteller Duncan Williamson. Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 98–103.10.1016/j.emospa.2009.07.001
   Google Scholar
• DCRT(Durham Community Research Team). (2011). Discussion Paper: Community-based Participatory Research: Ethical Challenges, Centre for Social Justice and Community Action. Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., & Lucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting UK policy contexts: Academic life in Education Departments in five English and Scottish universities. Higher Education, 54, 115–133.10.1007/s10734-006-9010-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, A., & Mauthner, N. (2002). Knowing responsibly: Ethics, feminist epistemologies and methodologies. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 123–145). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., Beebeejaun, Y., Rees, J., Richardson, J., & Richardson, L. (2011). Towards co-production in research with communities. Connected Communities. Retrieved from https://www.ahrc.ac.uk/documents/project-reports-and-reviews/connected-communities/towards-co-production-in-research-with-communities/
   Google Scholar
• Enright, B., & Facer, K. (2016). Developing Reflexive identities through collaborative, interdisciplinary and precarious work: the experience of early career researchers, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2007). Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 599–616.10.1177/1077800407301175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2016). Creating living communities. Retrieved from https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/files/75082783/FINAL_FINAL_CC_Creating_Living_Knowledge_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2006). Leadership, radical student engagement and the necessity of person-centred education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9, 299–313.10.1080/13603120600895411
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., Wood, M., & Centre, C. (2015). The politics of co-production: Risks, limits and pollution. Evidence and Policy, 12, 261–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (2005). Feminist methodology: New applications in the academy and public policy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 2211–2236.10.1086/428417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gadd, D., Fox, C., & Hale, B. (2013). Young people and violence against women. Criminal Justice Matters, 92, 36–37.10.1080/09627251.2013.805377
   Google Scholar
• Gatenby, B., & Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research: Methodological and ethical issues. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 89–105.10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00095-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer, A. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, Ethics and practicalities. Social Research Update, 36, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Guta, A., Flicker, S., & Roche, B. (2013). Governing through community allegiance: A qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research. Critical Public Health, 23, 432–451.10.1080/09581596.2012.761675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2003). Social research today: Some dilemmas and distinctions. Qualitative Social Work, 2, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S., Brooks, R., Cleaver, E., & Ireland, E. (2009). Researching young people’s lives. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446249420
   Google Scholar
• Hester, M., & Westmarland, N. (2005). Tackling domestic violence: Effective interventions and approaches. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. Retrieved from https://dro.dur.ac.uk/2556/1/2556.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (2004). Choosing margin as a Space of radical openness. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 153–160). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, C.-A., & Gunn, R. (2014). Recognition as a framework for ethical participatory research: Developing a methodology with looked after young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17, 475–488.10.1080/13645579.2012.753980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, L. K. (2016). Co-constructing research: A critical literature review. AHRC. Retrieved from https://connected-communities.org/index.php/project_resources/coconstructing-research-a-critical-literature-review
   Google Scholar
• Humble, D. (2012). “This isn’t getting easier”: Valuing emotion in development research. Emotion, Space and Society, 5, 78–85.10.1016/j.emospa.2011.04.001
   Google Scholar
• ICO. (2016). For organisations. Retrieved August 20, 2017, from http://www.ico.org.uk/for-organisations/
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Stanley, G. (2010). Collaborative action research: A democratic undertaking or a web of collusion and compliance? International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33, 151–163.10.1080/1743727X.2010.484549
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Stanley, G., & John, L. (2012). Mission impossible collaborative action research as game, ritual and real the conflictual nature of research-in-practice. International Review of Qualitative Research, 4, 231–252.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, S. (2013). Working reflexively with ethical complexity in narrative research with disadvantaged young people. Qualitative Social Work, 4, 502–521.
   Google Scholar
• Kesby, M. (2007). Spatialising participatory approaches: The contribution of geography to a mature debate. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2813–2831.10.1068/a38326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137314253
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching work within university education departments: Fragmentation or integration? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 17–29.10.1080/03098770601167849
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M. (2012). Privacy management on social media sites: Pew Internet Report. Retrieved from: Pew Research Centre http://www.isaca.org/Groups/Professional-English/privacy-data-protection/GroupDocuments/PIP_Privacy%20mgt%20on%20social%20media%20sites%20Feb%202012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McCarry, M. (2005). Conducting social research with young people: Ethical considerations. In T. Skinner, M. Hester, & E. Malos (Eds.), Researching gender violence: Feminist methodology in action (pp. 87–104). Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• McCarry, M. (2010). Becoming a ‘proper man’: Young people’s attitudes about interpersonal violence and perceptions of gender. Gender and Education, 22, 17–30.10.1080/09540250902749083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, A. (2010). ‘A friend and an equal’: Do young people in care seek the impossible from their social workers? British Journal of Social Work, 40, 772–788.10.1093/bjsw/bcn143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorani, T. (2013). Productive margins: Regulating for engagement scoping study: Phase I ( Unpublished manuscript). Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Nunkoosing, K. (2005). The problems with interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 698–706.10.1177/1049732304273903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24, 1073–1087.10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316423936
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R., Kesby, M., & Askins, K. (2012). The politics of social justice in neoliberal times: A reply to Slater. Area, 44, 120–123.10.1111/area.2012.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy-Smith, B. (2010). Councils, consultations and community: Rethinking the spaces for children and young people's participation. Children’s Geographies, 8, 107–122.10.1080/14733281003691368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, R., & Hase, S. (2002). Complexity and action research: Exploring the theoretical and methodological connections. Educational Action Research, 10, 507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. (2000). Research performances. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 639–650.10.1068/d218t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P. (1994). Participation in human inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.peterreason.eu/Participationinhumaninquiry/Contents_list.html
   Google Scholar
• Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2008). Extending epistemology within a cooperative inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research (pp. 366–380). London: Sage.10.4135/9781848607934
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, C. M., & Lewis, B. L. (2014). Ethical research standards in a world of big data. F1000Research, 3, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2007). Neoliberalism, performativity and research. International Review of Education, 53, 349–365.10.1007/s11159-007-9049-9
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. L. (2001). Passing through the door: Social movement literature and legal scholarship. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150(1), 1–83.10.2307/3312912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. P., Gomez, J. M., & Freyd, J. J. (2014). Psychology of judicial betrayal. The Roger Williams University Law Review, 19, 451.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. (2002). Confidentiality and anonymity: Promises and practices. In W. C. van den Hoonard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers (pp. 70–78). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, L., & Woodthorpe, K. (2011). Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research, 11, 197–212.10.1177/1468794110394073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J., & Garthwaite, K. (2015). Whose side are we on and for whom do we write? Notes on issues and challenges facing those researching and evaluating public policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 11, 225–237.10.1332/174426415X14314311257040
   Google Scholar
• Xavier Grau, F., Goddard, J., Hall, B., Hazelkorn, E., & Tandon, R. (2017). Recommendations for academia, academic leaders and higher education and research policymakers. In Higher Education in the World 6: Towards a socially responsible university: Balancing the global with the local, (pp. 502–520). Retrieved from https://www.guninetwork.org/files/download_full_report.pdfonline
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 313–325.10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitter, A. (2014). Big data ethics. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar