Confounding issues related to determining sample size in qualitative research

References

• Barker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (Eds.). (2012). How many qualitative interviews are enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling cases in qualitative research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1940). Constructive Typology in the Social Sciences. American Sociological Review, 5, 40–55.10.2307/2083940
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2004a). Abduction. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Vol. 1 (pp. 1–2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2004b). Deduction. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Vol. 1 (p. 243). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2004c). Induction. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Vol. 2 (pp. 486–487). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2004d). Retroduction. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Vol. 3 (p. 972). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2010). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (forthcoming). Abduction. In P. A. Atkinson, S. Delamont, M. Hardy & M. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods: An encyclopedia. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N., & Priest, J. (2017). Social research: Paradigms in action. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, C. R. (2005). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 19, 426–432.
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, J. (Ed.). (1992). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 173–184.10.1080/13645570500154642
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analyses, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 739–743.10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (1988). Quality and quantity in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.10.4324/9780203410028
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2015). Response to Fugard and Potts: Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 689–691.10.1080/13645579.2015.1005455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., & Washburn, S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research; examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1001–1014.10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00350-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. D. (1973). Understanding everyday life. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Towards the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 3–44). London: Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1319–1320.10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2015a). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2015b). Themes, variables, and the limits to calculating sample size in qualitative research: A response to Fugard and Potts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 685–686.10.1080/13645579.2015.1005457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-driven interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229–1245.10.1080/08870440903194015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2015a). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 669–684.10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2015b). Response to comments. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 693–694.10.1080/13645579.2015.1005454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2016). ‘Shine bright like a diamond’? A reply to Braun and Clarke. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 745–746.10.1080/13645579.2016.1205794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, R. (2015). How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? Journal of Building Engineering, 1, 2–12.10.1016/j.jobe.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29, 3–22.10.1177/1525822X16639015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagaman, A. K., & Wutich, A. (2017). How many interviews are enough to identify metathemes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) landmark study. Field Methods, 29, 23–41.10.1177/1525822X16640447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfpenny, P. (1996, July). The relation between social theory and the practice of quantitative and qualitative social research. Paper presented at the Fourth International Social Science Methodology Conference, University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2015). Sampling and thematic analysis: A response to Fugard and Potts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 687–688.10.1080/13645579.2015.1005456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (1961). Theories and things. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27, 591–608.10.1177/1049732316665344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1753–1760.10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in is research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54, 11–22.10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, J. C. (1970). Sociological theory and the process of typification. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 236–239). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 3–5.10.1177/104973200129118183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers (Vols. I and II). C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18, 179–183.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, J., Saunders, B., Waterfield, J. & Kingstone, T. (2018). Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30, 167–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. A. (1994). Patterns of crisis behaviour: A qualitative inquiry. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 195–215). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203413081
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1947). The methodology of the social sciences. (E. A. Shils & H. A. Finch, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar