1,142
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Middle alternatives and measurement validity: a recommendation for survey researchers

&
Pages 169-184 | Received 23 Jan 2019, Accepted 15 Jul 2019, Published online: 25 Jul 2019

References

  • Ayidiya, S. A., & McClendon, M. J. (1990). Response effects in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 229–247.
  • Baka, A., Figgou, L., & Triga, V. (2012). “Neither agree, nor disagree”: A critical analysis of the middle answer category in voting advice applications. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(3), 244–263.
  • Bishop, G. F. (1987). Experiments with the middle response alternative in survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 220–232.
  • Bishop, G. F., Hippler, H. J., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1988). A comparison of response effects in self-administered and telephone surveys. In R. M. Groves, P. P. Biemer, L. E. Lyberg, J. T. Massey, W. L. Nichols II, & J. Waksberg (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 321–340). New York: Wiley.
  • Converse, J. M., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude measurement and questionnaire design. In A. S. R. Manstead & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 42–47). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Kalton, G., Collins, M., & Brook, L. (1978). Experiments in wording opinion questions. Applied Statistics, 27, 149–161.
  • Kalton, G., Roberts, J., & Holt, D. (1980). The effects of offering a middle response option with opinion questions. The Statistician, 29, 65–78.
  • Klopfer, F. J., & Madden, T. M. (1980). The middle-most choice on attitude items: Ambivalence, neutrality or uncertainty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(1), 97–101.
  • Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213–236.
  • Krosnick, J. A., & Berent, M. K. (1993). Comparisons of party identification and policy preferences: The impact of survey question format. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 941–964.
  • Krosnick, J. A., Narayan, S., & Smith, W. R. (1996). Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence. In M. T. Braverman & J. K. Slater (Eds.), Advances in survey research (pp. 29–44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5–55.
  • Malhotra, N., Krosnick, J. A., & Thomas, R. K. (2009). Optimal design of branching questions to measure bipolar constructs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 304–324.
  • Moser, C., & Kalton, G. (1972). Survey methods in social investigation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2014). Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 71–89.
  • Narayan, S., & Krosnick, J. A. (1996). Education moderates some response effects in attitude measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 58–88.
  • Nowlis, S. M., Kahn, B. E., & Dhar, R. (2002). Coping with ambivalence: The effect of removing a neutral option on consumer attitude and preference judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 319–334.
  • O’Muircheartaigh, C., Krosnick, J. A., & Helic, A. (1999). Middle alternatives, acquiescence, and the quality of questionnaire data. Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research annual meeting, St. Petersburg, FL.
  • Rugg, D., & Cantril, H. (1944). The wording of questions. In H. Cantril (Ed.), Gauging public opinion (pp. 23–50). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Schaeffer, N. C., & Presser, S. (2003). The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 65–88.
  • Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. New York: Academic Press.
  • Sturgis, P., Roberts, C., & Smith, P. (2012). Middle alternatives revisited: How the neither/nor response acts as a way of saying “I don’t know”? Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 15–38.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.