1,161
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Handling missing data in numeric analyses

ORCID Icon

References

  • Behaghel, L., Crepon, B., Gurgand, M., & Le Barbanchon, T. (2009) Sample attrition bias in randomized surveys: A tale of two surveys. IZA Discussion Paper 4162, http://ftp.iza.org/dp4162.pdf, accessed 060714
  • Berchtold, A. (2019). Treatment and reporting of item-level missing data in social science research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22, 431–439.
  • Brunton-Smith, I., Carpenter, J., Kenward, M., & Tarling, R. (2014). Multiple imputation for handling missing data in social research. Social Research Update, 65(Autumn), 2014.
  • Crameri, A., von Wyl, A., Koemeda, M., Schulthess, P., & Tschuschke, V. (2015). Sensitivity analysis in multiple imputation in effectiveness studies of psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1042.
  • Cuddeback, G., Wilson, E., Orme, J., & Combs-Orme, T. (2004). Detecting and statistically correcting sample selection bias. Journal of Social Service Research, 30(3), 19–30.
  • Dolton, Lindeboom, M., & Van den Berg, G. (2000) Survey attrition: A taxonomy and the search for valid instruments to correct for biases. Retrieved from http://www.fcsm.gov/99papers/berlin.html
  • Dong, Y., & Peng, C. (2013) Principled missing data methods for researchers, Springer Open. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-222
  • Fidler, F., Thomson, N., Cumming, G., Finch, S., & Leeman, J. (2004). Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can’t make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychological Science, 15(2), 119–126.
  • Frank, K., Maroulis, S., Doung, M., & Kelcey, B. (2013). What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(4), 437–460.
  • Gorard, S. (2010). Serious doubts about school effectiveness. British Educational Research Journal, 36(5), 735–766.
  • Gorard, S. (2012). Who is eligible for free school meals?: Characterising FSM as a measure of disadvantage in England. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1003–1017.
  • Gorard, S. (2013a). Research design: Robust approaches for the social sciences. London: SAGE.
  • Gorard, S. (2013b). The propagation of errors in experimental data analysis: A comparison of pre- and post-test designs. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 36(4), 372–385.
  • Gorard, S. (2019). Do we really need confidence intervals in the new statistics? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(3), 281–291.
  • Gorard, S., See, B. H., & Siddiqui, N. (2017). The trials of evidence-based education. London: Routledge.
  • Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2019) How trajectories of disadvantage help explain school attainment. SAGE Open, Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244018825171
  • Hansen, M., & Hurwitz, W. (1946). The problem of non-response in sample surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41, 517–529.
  • Hughes, R., Heron, J., Sterne, J., & Tilling, K. (2019). Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: Multiple imputation is not always the answer. International Journal of Epidemiology, 48, 1294–1304.
  • Kolmogorov, A., & Uspenskii, V. (1987). Algorithms and randomness. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 32(3), 389–412.
  • Lehtonen, R., & Pahkinen, E. (1995). Practical methods for design and analysis of complex surveys. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Lindner, J., Murphy, T., & Briers, G. (2001). Handling non-response in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(3), 43–53.
  • Lipsey, M., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M., … Busick, M. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. Washington DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
  • Little, R., & Rubin, D. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Pannell, D. (1997). Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: Theoretical framework and practical strategies. Agricultural Economics, 16, 139–152.
  • Peress, M. (2010). Correcting for survey nonresponse using variable response propensity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 1418–1430. Retrived from http://www.rochester.edu/College/faculty/mperess/Nonresponse.pdf
  • Sheikh, K., & Mattingly, S. (1981). Investigating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 35, 293–296.
  • Siddiqui, N., Boliver, V., & Gorard, S. (2019). Assessing the reliability of longitudinal social surveys of access to higher education: The case of the Next Steps survey in England. Social Inclusion, 7, 1.
  • Soley-Bori, M. (2013) Dealing with missing data: Key assumptions and methods for applied analysis, Technical Report No. 4, Boston University School of Public Health. Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2014/05/Marina-tech-report.pdf
  • Starbuck, W. (2016). 60th anniversary essay: How journals could improve research practices in social science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(2), 165–183.
  • Sterne, J., White, I., Carlin, J., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M., … Carpenter, J. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338, b2393.
  • Swalin, A. (2018) How to handle missing data. Retrieved from https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-handle-missing-data-8646b18db0d4
  • Thabane, L., Mbuagbaw, L., Zhang, S., Samaan, Z., Marcucci, M., Ye, C., Thabane, M. (2013). A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 92. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/92
  • van Buuren, S. (2018). Flexible imputation of missing data. Chapman and Hall, CRC Press.
  • Volcan, S. (2002) What is a random sequence? The Mathematical Association of America, 109. Retrieved from https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/22/Ford/Volchan46-63.pdf
  • von Mises, R., & Doob, J. (1941). Discussions of papers in probability theory. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12(2), 215–217.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.