An extended briefing and debriefing technique to enhance data quality in cross-national/language mixed-method research

References

• Alcoff, L. M. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. A., Reiter-Palmon, R., Crowe, J., & Scott, C. (2018). Debriefs: Teams learning from doing in context. American Psychologist, 73(4), 504–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.) M. Evans, Ed. Australia: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, I. (2012). Handling interpretation and representation in multilingual research: A meta-study of pragmatic issues resulting from the use of multiple languages in a qualitative information systems research work. The Qualitative Report, 17(84), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C. T., Bernal, H., & Froman, R. D. (2003). Methods to document semantic equivalence of a translated scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 26, 64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R. C., & Tyyskä, V. (2011). A critical reflection on the use of translators/interpreters in a qualitative cross-language research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(2), 178–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beullens, K., Loosveldt, G., Denies, K., & Vandenplas, C. (2014). Quality matrix for the european social survey, Round 7. London.
   Google Scholar
• Biemer, P. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. (P. P. Biemer & L. E. Lyberg, Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Pragmatism and the Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Research1. In SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 1–27. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. F., & Machado, A. A. (2013). Ensuring Quality in qualitative inquiry: Using key concepts as guidelines. Critique, 3(July/Sept), 572–579.
   Google Scholar
• Chereni, S., Sliuzas, R. V., Flacke, J., & van Maarseveen, M. (2020). The influence of governance rearrangements on flood risk management in Kampala, Uganda. Environmental Policy and Governance, (January 10), eet.1881.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1944). On errors in surveys. American Sociological Review, 9(4), 359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1994). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Educ. Res. Perspect, (March), 38(1), 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Elam, G., & Fenton, K. A. (2003). Researching sensitive issues and ethnicity: Lessons from sexual health. Ethnicity and Health, 8(1), 15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M., Weist, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2003). For whom? Qualitative research, represantations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 167–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The ‘What’ and ‘How’ of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godard, B. (1986). Theorizing feminist discourse/translation. Tessera 6, no. spring, Second Storey Press, Toronto: 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Journal Of Mixed Methods Research 2, No, 2, 190-192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, L., Hunt, S., & Bhopal, R. (2008). Insights from research on cross-cultural validation of health-related questionnaires: The role of bilingual project workers and lay participants. Current Sociology, 56(1), 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., & Brown, G. (2010). Mixing interview and questionnaire methods: Practical problems in aligning data. Practical Assessment Research, 15(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ibri, I. A. (2013). Neopragmatism viewed by pragmaticism: A redescription. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 1(July), 0–13.
   Google Scholar
• Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1998). Juran’s quality control handbook (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGrawHill.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, P., & Van Teijlingen, E. (2009). Lost in translation: Reflecting on a model to reduce translation and interpretation bias. The Open Nursing Journal, 3, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kish, L. (1965). SurveySampling. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Philosophical review (Vol. II). Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. K., Sulaiman-Hill, C. R., & Thompson, S. C. (2014). Overcoming language barriers in community-based research with refugee and migrant populations: options for using bilingual workers. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 14(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, L. (2002). Briefing and debriefing of student fieldwork experiences: Exploring concerns and reflecting on practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 49(August), 82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. L. A., & Samuel, L. A. (1979). Bringing up the rear: A memoir. C. Marshall Ed.. New York, NY: Presidio Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathee, A., Harpham, T., Naicker, N., Barnes, B., Plagerson, S., Feit, M., … Naidoo, S. (2010). Overcoming fieldwork challenges in urban health research in developing countries: A research note. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2 (April)), 171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meleis, A. I. (1996). Culturally competent scholarship: Substance and rigor. Advances in Nursing Science, 19(2), 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, N. G. (2017). Realizing the good: Hegel ’ s critique of Kantian morality. European Journal of Philosophy, 26(1), 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. (2016). Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. In Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie (eds.,). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 339–352), SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1986). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Los Angels: University of California press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, P. J. (1987). Community, conflict, and ways of knowing: Ways to deepen our educational agenda. Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning, 19(5), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Peters-Guarin, G., McCall, M. K., & Van Westen, C. (2012). Coping strategies and risk manageability: Using participatory geographical information systems to represent local knowledge. Disasters, 36(1), 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238–264.
   Google Scholar
• Raths, J. (1987). Enhancing understanding through debriefing. Education Leadership, 45(2), 24–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: constructing an academic life. Rutgers University Press, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1980). Pragmatism, relativism, and irrationalism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 53(6 (August)), 717.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein-Ávila, E. (2009). Reflecting on the challenges of conducting research across national and linguistic borders: Lessons from the field. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 5(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sanzone, L. A., Lee, J. Y., Divaris, K., DeWalt, D. A., Baker, A. D., & Vann, W. F., Jr. (2013). A cross sectional study examining social desirability bias in caregiver reporting of children’s oral health behaviors. BMC Oral Health, 13(1), 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regina Scheyvens, Barbara Nowak and Henry Schevens (2011). Ethical issues in: Scheyvens, R., & Storey, D. (eds.,). Development fieldwork. In Development fieldwork (pp. 2–13). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 58–72.
   Google Scholar
• Sellberg, C. (2017). From briefing, through scenario, to debriefing: The Maritime instructor’s work during simulator-based training. Cognition, Technology and Work, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shesterinina, A. (2019). Ethics, empathy, and fear in research on violent conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 56(2 (March 28)), 190–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimpuku, Y., & Norr, K. F. (2012). Working with interpreters in cross-cultural qualitative research in the context of a developing country: Systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(8), 1692–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, R., Yelland, J., Lumley, J., Rice, P. L., Cotronei, V., & Warren, R. (1999). Cross-cultural research: Trying to do it better 2. Enhancing data quality. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23(4 (August)), 390–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, A. (2008). Language barriers and qualitative nursing research: Methodological considerations. International Nursing Review. Vol. 55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, A. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: a research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 46, No, 2, 227–287.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, B. (2002). Crossed wires: Interpreters, translators, and bilingual workers in cross-language research. Qualitative Health Research, 12(6), 844–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, B. (2006). Being bilingual: Issues for cross-language research. Journal of Research Practice, 2. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, C. (2017). GeoHumanities, GIScience and smart city lifeworld approaches to geography and the new human condition. Global and Planetary Change, 156, 147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. (2010). Research note: The silenced assistant. reflections of invisible interpreters and research assistants. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51(2), 206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodonick, J. (2017). Neo-pragmatism: An ethical anticipatory system. European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1), 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., Medd, W. R., Burningham, M.-E., & Tapsell, J. (2010). Children and young people ‘after the Rain Has Gone’ learning lessons for flood recovery and resilience, final project report for ‘Children, Flood and Urban Resilience: Understanding children and young people’s experience and agency in the flood recovery process’. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, A.-M., & Ahlstrom, G. (2006). Cross-cultural interview studies using interpreters: Systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(6), 723–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar