References
- Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potential and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet 5.
- Barlow, C., & Awan, I. (2016). “You Need to Be Sorted Out With a Knife”: The Attempted Online Silencing of Women and People of Muslim Faith Within Academia. Social Media+ Society, 2(4), 2056305116678896.
- Bartlett, J. (2014). The dark net: Inside the digital underworld. Heinemann.
- BSA. (2017). Ethics guidelines and collated resources for digital research: Statement of ethical practice annex. British Sociological Association. https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24309/bsa_statement_of_ethical_practice_annexe.pdf
- Chess, S., & Shaw, A. (2015). A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about# GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 208–220.
- Donath, J. (2014). The social machine. Design for living online. MIT University Press.
- Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (eds). (1991). Using computers in qualitative research. Sage.
- Fuchs, C. (2019). What is critical digital social research? Five reflections on the study of digital society. Journal of Digital Social Research, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v1i1.7
- Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
- Halford, S., Weal, M., Tinati, R., Carr, L., & Pope, C. (2018). Understanding the production and circulation of social media data: Towards methodological principles and praxis. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3341–3358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817748953
- Hine, C. (2004). Social research methods and the internet: A thematic review. Sociological Research Online, 9(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.924
- Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459
- Holstein, J., & Grubium, J. (2016). Narrative practice and the active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research. (pp. 67–83). Sage.
- Jacobsson, K., & Åkerström, M. (2012). Interviewees with an agenda: Learning from a “failed” interview. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 717–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112465631
- James, N., & Busher, H. (2016). Online interviewing. Qualitative research (4th ed. SAGE Publications Inc.
- Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
- Lavorgna, A., & Di Ronco, A. (2017). Fraud victims or unwary accomplices? An exploratory study of online communities supporting quack medicine. In P. C. van Duyne, J. Harvey, G. A. Antonopoulos, & K. von Lampe (Eds.), The many faces of crime for profit and ways of tackling it. (pp. 297–325). Wolf Legal Publishers.
- Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568
- Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. John Hunt Publishing.
- O’Connor, H., Madge, C. (2008). Internet-based interviewing. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods. (pp. 416–435). Sage.
- Philipps, A., & Mrowczynski, R. (2019). Getting more out of interviews. Understanding interviewees’ accounts in relation to their frames of orientation. Qualitative Research ( Online First), 146879411986754. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119867548
- Sade-Beck, L. (2004). Internet ethnography: Online and offline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(2), 45–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300204
- Salmons, J. (2009). Online interviews in real time. Sage.
- Salmons, J. (2011). Cases in online interview research. Sage Publications.
- Salmons, J. (2014). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design, and skills. Sage Publications.
- Schütze, F. (1983). Biographieforschung und narratives Interview. Neue Praxis, 13(3), 283–293. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53147
- Silverman, D. (2017). How was it for you? The interview society and the irresistible rise of the (poorly analyzed) interview. Qualitative Research, 17(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116668231
- Social Data Lab. (2019). Lab online guide to social media research ethics. http://socialdatalab.net/ethics-resources.
- Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720
- Weiner, M. D., Puniello, O. T., Siracusa, P. C., & Crowley, J. E. (2017). Recruiting hard-to-reach populations: The utility of facebook for recruiting qualitative in-depth interviewees. Survey Practice, 10(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2017-0021
- Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an ethical framework for publishing Twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149–1168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140
- Zimmer, M., & Kinder-Kurlanda, K. (eds.). (2017). Research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang.