Increase in the quality of methodological documentation of cross-national pan-European multi-wave surveys over the last 40 years – a research note

References

• AAPOR. (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biemer, P. P. (2010). Total survey error: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, G., & Rasmussen, K. B. (2004). The data documentation initiative: The value and significance of a worldwide standard. Social Science Computer Review, 22(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304263144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckman, S., & Koch, A. (2019). Interviewer involvement in sample selection shapes the relationship between response rates and data quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(2), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. M. (2016). Identifying same-sex couples in cross-national survey data: A comparison of same-sex couples’ demographic and socio-economic traits in six European countries. DANS Symposium Publications, 8
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabkowski, P., & Kołczyńska, M. (2020a). Sampling and fieldwork practices in Europe: Analysis of methodological documentation from 1,537 surveys in five cross-national projects, 1981–2017. Methodology. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral Science, 16(3), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.2795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabkowski, P., & Kołczyńska, M. (2020b). Supplementary materials [Reserch data] to: Sampling and fieldwork practices in Europe: Analysis of methodological documentation from 1,537 surveys in five cross-national projects, 1981–2017 Methodology. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral Science 16(3), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3461
   Google Scholar
• Jabkowski, P., Cichocki, P., & Kołczyńska, M. (2021). Multi-project assessments of sample quality in cross-national surveys: The role of weights in applying external and internal measures of sample bias. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedinger, A., Watteler, O., & Förster, A. (2018). Improving the quality of survey data documentation: A total survey error perspective. Data, 3(4), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/data3040045
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, U. (2007). Surveys from inside: An assessment of unit nonresponse bias with internal criteria. Survey Research Methods, 1(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2007.v1i2.75
   Google Scholar
• Kołczyńska, M., & Schoene, M. (2018). Survey data harmonization and the quality of data documentation in cross‐national surveys. In T. D. Johnson, B.-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, & B. Dorer (Eds.), Advances in comparative survey methods: Multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (3MC) (pp. 963–984). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch44
   Google Scholar
• Mohler, P. P., Hansen, S. E., Pennell, B.-E., Thomas, W., Wackerow, J., & Hubbard, F. (2010). A survey process quality perspective on documentation. In J. A. Harkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards, T. P. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. P. Mohler, B.-E. Pennell, & T. W. Smith (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts () (pp. 299–314). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470609927.ch16
   Google Scholar
• Vardigan, M., Heus, P., & Thomas, W. (2008). Data documentation initiative: Toward a standard for the social sciences. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.45
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, H. F. (2005). The total survey error approach: A guide to the new science of survey research. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar