Research synthesis in times of crisis: setting the agenda for mixed method, collaborative research on poverty in a post-pandemic world

References

• Arday, J., & Mirza, H. S. (eds.). (2018). Dismantling race in higher education: Racism, whiteness and decolonising the academy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K. (2018). White privilege: The myth of a post-racial society. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, L., & Neale. (2012). Data management for Qualitative Longitudinal researchers. Timescapes Methods Guides series. https://docplayer.net/11649704-Timescapes-methods-guides-series-2012-guide-no-17.html
   Google Scholar
• Brannelly, T. (2018). An ethics of care research manifesto. International Journal of Care and Caring, 2(3), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788218X15351944886756
   Google Scholar
• Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(4), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581902320432732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coverdale, A., Meckin, R., & Nind, M. (2021). The NCRM wayfinder guide to doing ethical research during Covid-19. National Centre for Research Methods. Retrieved from 5/July/21: /http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/4401/
   Google Scholar
• Craig, G., Cole, B., & Ali, N. (2019) The missing dimension: Where is ‘race’ in social policy teaching and learning? Social policy association. Retrieved from 1/August/22 http://www.social-policy.org.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/BME-Audit-Final-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, E., Edwards, R., Jamieson, L., & Weller, S. (2019). Big data, qualitative style: A breadth-and-depth method for working with large amounts of secondary qualitative data. Quality & Quantity, 53(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0757-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewaele, A., Vandael, K., Meysman, S., & Buysse, A. (2021). Understanding collaborative interactions in relation to research impact in social sciences and humanities: A meta-ethnography. Research Evaluation, 30(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, L. H. (2003). Synthesis through meta-ethnography: Paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794103033003
   Google Scholar
• Feast, A., Orrell, M., Charlesworth, G., Poland, F., Featherstone, K., Melunsky, N., & Moniz-Cook, E. (2018). Using meta-ethnography to synthesize relevant studies: Capturing the bigger picture in dementia with challenging behavior within families. Sage Research Methods Cases. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526444899
   Google Scholar
• Garthwaite, K., Patrick, R., Power, M., Tarrant, A., & Warnock, R. (editors). (2022). Covid-19 collaborations: Researching poverty and low-income family life during the pandemic. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groot, B. C., Vink, M., Haveman, A., Huberts, M., Schout, G., & Abma, T. A. (2019). Ethics of care in participatory health research: Mutual responsibility in collaboration with co-researchers. Educational Action Research, 27(2), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1450771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J., Vom Brocke, J., Handali, J., Otto, M., & Schneider, J. (2020). Virtually in this together–how web-conferencing systems enabled a new virtual togetherness during the Covid-19 crisis. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Gaved, M., & Sargent, J. (2021). Participatory research approaches in times of covid-19: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211010087. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211010087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., Mcintosh, K., & Neitzert, E. (2017) Intersectional inequalities: The impact of austerity on black and minority ethnic women in the UK. Women’s Budget Group and Runnymede Trust. Retrieved from 1/August/22: https://www.intersecting-inequalities.com/copy-of-report.
   Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Mixed methods research synthesis: Definition, framework, and potential. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9538-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2022). Looking at the ‘field’ through a zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research, 22(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., & Tarrant, A. (eds). (2020). Qualitative secondary analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, S., & Winterton, M. (2011). Debates in qualitative secondary analysis: Critical reflections. Timescapes: An ESRC qualitative longitudinal study UK data archive. University of Leeds, London South Bank University, Cardiff University, The University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. A., & Oakley, C. (2018) The Precarious Postdoc: Interdisciplinary Research and Casualised Labour in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Retrieved from 1/August/22. https://hearingthevoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/WKPS_PrecariousPostdoc_PDF_Feb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., Rhodes, T., & Rosengarten, M. (2020). Making evidence and policy in public health emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19 for adaptive evidence-making and intervention. Evidence & Policy, 16(3), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X15913559981103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. P., Hart, R. I., Watson, R. M., & Rapley, T. (2015). Qualitative synthesis in practice: Some pragmatics of meta-ethnography. Qualitative Research, 15(3), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114524221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, A. N., Harris, A., & Luka, M. E. (2021). Massive and microscopic sensemaking during covid-19 times. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420962477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, B., & Bishop, L. (2012). The Timescapes archive: A stakeholder approach to archiving qualitative longitudinal data. Qualitative Research, 12(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111426233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., Coverdale, A., & Meckin, R. (2021). Changing social research practices in the context of covid-19: Rapid evidence review. Project Report. National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/4398/
   Google Scholar
• Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M. (2016). Neoliberal competition in higher education today: Research, accountability and impact. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1100530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, B., Cheah, P. Y., & Marsh, V. (2020). Solidarity and community engagement in global health research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 20(5), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1745930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S. A., Tuckerman, L., Vorley, T., & Gherhes, C. (2021). Resilient research in the field: Insights and lessons from adapting qualitative research projects during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211016106. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211016106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the Schools: a Nationally Refereed Journal Sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alabama, 13(1), 29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809982/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sime, D. (2008). Ethical and methodological issues in engaging young people living in poverty with participatory research methods. Children’s geographies, 6 (1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280701791926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, A. (2017). Getting out of the swamp? Methodological reflections on using qualitative secondary analysis to develop research design. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1257678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., & Berriman, L. (2021). Starting with the archive: Principles for prospective collaborative research. Qualitative Research, 14687941211023037. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F14687941211023037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrieta Jr, L., & Noblit, G. W. (Eds.). (2018). Cultural constructions of identity: Meta-ethnography and theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voils, C. I., Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Hasselblad, V. (2008). Making sense of qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed research synthesis studies. Field Methods, 20(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X07307463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during covid-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar