Everyday talk: self-directed peer focus groups with diverse youth

References

• Alderson, P. (1995). Listening to children: Children’s ethics and social research. Barnardos.
   Google Scholar
• Arnot, M., & Reay, D. (2007). A sociology of pedagogic voice: Power, inequality and student consultation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458814
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, V. (2011). Children as peer researchers: Reflections on a journey of mutual discovery. Children & Society, 25(6), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sousa Santos, B. (2015). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Devotta, K., Woodhall-Melnik, J., Pedersen, C., Wendaferew, A., Dowbor, T. P., Guilcher, S. J., … Matheson, F. I. (2016). Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: A case study. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115626244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djohari, N., & Higham, R. (2020). Peer-led focus groups as ‘dialogic spaces’ for exploring young people’s evolving values. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(5), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1754763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C., & Limb, M. (2001). Introduction: Doing qualitative research in geography. In M. Limb & C. Dwyer (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates (pp. 1–20). Arnold/Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, I. (2005). Feminist geography, the ‘everyday’, and local-global relations: Hidden spaces of place-making. The Canadian Geographer, 49(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2005.00092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergler, C. (2015). Beyond passive participation: From research on to research by children. In R. Evans, L. Holt, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Methodological Approaches (pp. 1–19). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, L., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through participatory methods. Childhood, 15(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2008). ‘Power is not evil’: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280801963045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham, R., & Djohari, N. (2018). From voting to engaging: Promoting democratic values across an international school network. Oxford Review of Education, 44(6), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1433649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N. J., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17(3), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210369310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioane, J. (2017). Talanoa with Pasifika youth and their families. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 46(38–45).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., & Prout, A. (1990). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellett, M. (2011). Empowering children and young people as researchers: Overcoming barriers and building capacity. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9103-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lile, J., & Richards, L. (2018). Youth as interviewers: Methods and findings of participatory peer interviews in a youth garden project. Journal of Adolescent Research, 33(4), 496–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558416670009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lushey, C. J. (2017). Peer research methodology: Challenges and solutions. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473994614
   Google Scholar
• Lushey, C. J., & Munro, E. R. (2015). Participatory peer research methodology: An effective method for obtaining young people’s perspectives on transitions from care to adulthood? Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014559282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, L., Smith, A., & Funaki, H. (2021). “When am I supposed to teach Māori and find the time to learn it?“: Settler affirmations in Aotearoa New Zealand schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00222-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2008). The value of exploratory talk. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring everyday talk in schools (pp. 55–72). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2018). Education counts. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/find-school
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2019). PISA2018: Reading in New Zealand - reading achievement and experiences of 15-year-olds. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. (2006). Peer led focus groups and young people. Children & Society, 20(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/CHI.892
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K., Munro, J., & Smith, A. (2005). A counter-narrative of a ‘failed’ interview. Qualitative Research, 5(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105050836
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K., Sligo, J., & Freeman, C. (2006). Polarizing participation in local government: Which young people are included and excluded? Children, Youth and Environments, 16(2), 248–271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.16.2.0248
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Foreign-bornpopulation. https://data.oecd.org/migration/foreign-born-population.htm#indicator-chart
   Google Scholar
• Percy-Smith, B., & Thomas, N. (2010). A handbook of children and young people’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, E., Neysmith, S. M., Reitsma-Street, M., & Collins, S. B. (2009). Reciprocal peer interviewing. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2009.2.2.291
   Google Scholar
• Punch, S. (2002). Interviewing strategies with young people: The ‘secret box’, stimulus material and task-based activities. Children and Society, 16(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.685
   Google Scholar
• Quijada, D. A. (2009). Youth debriefing diversity workshops: Conversational contexts that forge intercultural alliances across differences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390802136987
   Google Scholar
• Ristow, B. (2022). Bicultural education in a multiethnic Aotearoa New Zealand: Sustaining Te Ao Māori [PhD]. Victoria University of Wellington. https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/articles/thesis/Bicultural_Education_in_a_Multiethnic_Aotearoa_New_Zealand_Sustaining_Te_Ao_M_ori/19674609/1
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, L., Kofman, E., & Aaron, P. (2011). Insiders and outsiders: Working with peer researchers in researching Muslim communities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.481835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sands, S., & Beverland, M. (2011). Kiwiana: National identity and consumption. European Advances in Consumer Research, 9(1), 491. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/1006908/eacr/vol9/E-09
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T., Smith, G. H., Boler, M., Kempton, M., Ormond, A., Chueh, H. C., & Waetford, R. (2002). ‘Do you guys hate aucklanders too?’ Youth: Voicing difference from the rural heartland. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172
   Google Scholar
• Tandon, R. (2014). Dialogue. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The SAGE enclyopedia of action research (pp. 260–263). Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Te Riele, K. (2013). Formal frameworks as resources for ethical youth research. In K. Te Riele & R. Brooks (Eds.), Negotiating ethical challeneges in youth research (pp. 3–15). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thambinathan, V., & Kinsella, E. A. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211014766. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, D., Mann, R., & Tacticos, T. (2011). Using peer‐interviewing methods to explore place‐based disadvantage: Dissolving the distance between suits and civilians. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(5), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.537527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2018). Researching drinking “with” young people: A palette of methods. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 18(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-08-2017-0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. J. (2021). Silence is not always golden: Reciprocal peer interviews as a method to engage youth in discussion on violence in Honduras. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(4), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1801601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2018). Ethical challenges of community based participatory research: Exploring researchers’ experience. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1296714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, B. E. (2014). Researching the everyday: Young people’s experiences and expressions of citizenship. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.737047
   Google Scholar
• Wood, B. E., Taylor, R., & Atkins, R. (2018). Student voice, citizenship and regulated spaces. In R. Bourke & J. Loveridge (Eds.), Radical collegiality through student voice: Educational experience, policy and practice (pp. 179–196). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2017). Wilful ignorance and the emotional regime of schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1290785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar