903
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Benefits and challenges of engaging Majority World children in interdisciplinary, multi-qualitative-method, mental health research

, , , &
Pages 219-233 | Received 21 Apr 2022, Accepted 18 Nov 2022, Published online: 05 Dec 2022

References

  • Abdullah, D., Abdulla, B., & Liamputtong, P. (2021). Psychological response of children to home confinement during COVID-19: A qualitative arts-based research. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(6), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020972439
  • Barbour, R. (1998). Mixing qualitative methods: Quality assurance or qualitative quagmire? Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800306
  • Baum, M., & Smith. (2006). Participatory Action Research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(10), 854. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662
  • Bentley, N., Hartley, S., & Bucci, S. (2019). Systematic review of self-report measures of general mental health and wellbeing in adolescent mental health. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 22(2), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-00273-x
  • Biddle, L., Cooper, J., Owen-Smith, A., Klineberg, E., Bennewith, O., Hawton, K., Gunnell, D., Donovan, J., & Gunnell, D. (2013). Qualitative interviewing with vulnerable populations: Individuals’ experiences of participating in suicide and self-harm based research. Journal of Affective Disorders, 145(3), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.024
  • Bourne, A., & Robson, M. (2015). Participants’ reflections on being interviewed about risk and sexual behaviour: Implications for collection of qualitative data on sensitive topics. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.860747
  • Boyden, J., & Ennew, J. (1997). Children in focus: A manual for participatory research with children. Save the children. From https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/5412.pdf/
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Bryman, A. (2008). The end of the paradigm wars? In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods (13-25). Sage.
  • Callaghen, J., Alexander, J. H., & Fellin, L. C. (2016). Children’s embodied experience of living with domestic violence: “I’d go into my panic, and shake, really bad”. Subjectivity, 9, 339–419. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0011-9
  • Cameron, C. A., Theron, L., Tapanya, S., Li, C., Lau, C., Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2013). Visual perspectives on majority-world adolescent thriving. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00794.x
  • Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29(1), 325–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824
  • Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research, 18(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307309007
  • Faithfull, S., Brophy, L., Pennell, K., & Simmons, M. P. (2019). Barriers and enablers to meaningful youth participation in mental health research: Qualitative interviews with youth mental health researchers. Journal of Mental Health, 28(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2018.1521926
  • Fischer, A., Tobi, H., & Ronteltap, A. (2011). When Natural met Social: A Review of Collaboration between the Natural and Social Sciences. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(4), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801811X13160755918688
  • Flewitt, R., Jones, P., Potter, J., Domingo, M., Collins, P., Munday, E., & Stenning, K. (2018). I enjoyed it because  …  you could do whatever you wanted and be creative’: Three principles for participatory research and pedagogy. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(4), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1405928
  • Fraser, S., Lewis, V., Ding, S., Kellett, M., & Robinson, C. (2004). Doing Research with Children and Young People. Open University Press. Sage.
  • Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences. Routledge.
  • Getanda, E., Vostanis, P., & O’Reilly, M. (2017). Exploring the challenges of meeting child mental health needs through community engagement in Kenya. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 22(4), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12233
  • Haffejee, S., & Theron, L. (2022). Visual methods in resilience research: Reflections on its utility. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(1), 1, 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1545063
  • Haffejee, S., Theron, L., Hassan, S., & Vostanis, P. (2022). Juxtaposing disadvantaged children’s insights on psychosocial help-seeking with those of service providers: Lessons from South Africa and Pakistan. Child & Youth Services, Child and Youth Services, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2022.2101445
  • Haffejee, S., Vostanis, P., O’Reilly, M., Law, E., Eruyar, S., Fleury, J., Hassan, S., & Getanda, E. (inpress). Disruptions, Adjustments, and Hopes: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child well-being in five Majority World Countries. Children & Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12563
  • Hancock, M., Amankwaa, L., Revell, A., & Mueller, D. (2016). Focus group data saturation: A new approach to data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(11), 2124–2130. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2330
  • Heath, S., Fuller, A., & Johnston, B. (2009). Chasing shadows: Defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343631
  • Higginbottom, G., & Liamputtong, P. (Eds.). (2015). Participatory qualitative research methodologies in health. Sage.
  • Hore, K., Gaillard, J. C., Davies, T., & Kearns, R. (2021). Participatory research in practice: Understandings of power and embodied methodologies. New Zealand Geographer, 77(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12308
  • Huus, K., Schlebusch, L., Ramaahlo, M., Samuels, A., Berglund, I., & Dada, S. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to participation for children and adolescents with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries – A scoping review. African Journal of Disability, 10a771. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v10i0.771
  • James, A., & Prout, A. (2015). Introduction. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (classic) ed., pp. 1–5). Routledge.
  • Kiyimba, N., & O’Reilly, M. (2016). An exploration of the possibility for secondary traumatic stress amongst transcriptionists: A grounded theory approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1106630
  • Kvarnström, S. (2008). Difficulties in collaboration: A critical incident study of interprofessional healthcare teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820701760600
  • Lakhani, J., Benzies, K., & Hayden, K. 2012. Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: A comprehensive review of the literature. Clinical & Investigative Medicine, 35(5), E226. PMID: 23043705. https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v35i5.18698.
  • Larsson, I., Staland-Nyman, C., Svedberg, P., Nygren, J. M., & Carlsson, I.-M. (2018). Children and young people’s participation in developing interventions in health and well-being: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 507–??. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3219-2
  • Lester, J., & O’Reilly, M. (2021). Introduction to special issue quality in qualitative approaches: celebrating heterogeneity. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1931734
  • Livingstone, S. (2013). Online risk, harm and vulnerability: Reflections on the evidence base for child Internet safety policy. ZER: Journal of Communication Studies, 18(35), 13–28.
  • Mahadev, R. (2015). Making silent voices heard: Using participatory video to address sexual violence. Agenda, 29(3), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2015.1050818
  • Milne, E., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. Eds. 2011. Introduction Handbook of participatory video Lanham: AltaMira Press.
  • Montreuil, M., Bogossian, A., Laberge-Perrault, E., & Racine, E. (2021). A review of approaches, strategies and ethical considerations in participatory research with children. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1609406920987962. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987962
  • Nordentoft, H., & Kappel, N. (2011). Vulnerable participants in health research: Methodological and ethical challenges. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2011.597188
  • O’Cathain, A., & Thomas, K. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In C. Pope & N. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Health Care (third) ed., pp. : 102–111). Blackwell Publishing: BMJ books.
  • O’Reilly, M., & Dogra, N. (2016). Interviewing children and young people for research. Sage.
  • O’Reilly, M., & Kiyimba, N. (2015). Advanced Qualitative Research: A Guide to Contemporary Theoretical Debates. Sage.
  • O’Reilly, M., Kiyimba, N., & Drewett, A. (2020). Mixing qualitative methods versus methodologies: A critical reflection on communication and power in inpatient care. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21, 66–76. [special issue]. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12365.
  • O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106
  • Prout, A., & Tisdall, E. (2006). Conclusion: Social inclusion, the welfare state and understanding children’s participation. In E. Tisdall, J. Davis, A. Prout, & M. Hill (Eds.), Children, Young People and Social Inclusion: Participation for What? (1) ed., pp. 235–246). Policy Press.
  • Singhal, A., & Rattine-Flaherty, E. (2006). Pencils and photos as tools of communicative research and praxis: Analyzing Minga Perú’s quest for social justice in the Amazon. International Communication Gazette, 68(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048506065764
  • Tamburrino, I., Getanda, E., O’Reilly, M., & Vostanis, P. (2020). “Everybody’s responsibility”: Conceptualisation of youth mental health in Kenya. Journal of Child Health Care, 24(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493518814918
  • Thompson, S., Marsh, P., Mond, J., & Brown, C. (2019). Applying participatory health research elements in rural end-of-life research: Reflections on conducting in-depth Interviews with participants on sensitive topics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3310
  • Tobi, H., & Kampen, J. K. (2018). Research design: The methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8
  • Willig, C. 2008. Introducing Qualitative research Methods in Psychology: Adventures in Theory and Method (Second edition.) McGraw Hill/Open University press
  • World Health Organization. (2020). Adolescent Mental Health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health. (Accessed March 2022)