Tolerance in QCA: moving debates on design, calibration, analysis, and interpretation in QCA forward in macrocomparative resarch

References

• Abelson, R. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babones, S. (2013). Methods for quantitative macro-comparative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Brun Pederson, R. (2016). Causal case study methods: foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching and tracing. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, S. (2016). QCA as competing or complementary method? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis approach to protest event data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(5), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1051798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. A. (2020). Logical constraints: The limitations of qca in social science research. Political Analysis, 28(4), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2016). Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How do results vary as case weights change? Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0151-3
   Google Scholar
• Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusa, A. (2018). QCA with R: A Comprehensive Resource. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., Kvist, J., & Skaaning, S.E. (2013). Making the Most of configurational comparative analysis: An assessment of QCA Applications in comparative welfare state research. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., & Kühner, S. (2013). Beyond indices: The potential of fuzzy set ideal type analysis for cross-national analysis of policy outcomes. Policy and Society, 32(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marmot, M. (2015). The health gap: The challenge of an unequal world. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, P. A. (2022). Qualitative comparative analysis: An Introduction to research design and application. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, K. S. (2017). Negative case selection: Justifications and consequences for set-theoretic MMR. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(4), 739–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115591015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinson, C., Gerrits, L., Rutten, R., & Greckhamer, T. (2019). Avoiding common errors in QCA: A Short guide for new practitioners. Available from Compass Organisation. https://compasss.org/blog/2019/07/23/avoiding-common-errors-in-qca/
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q. (2018). Realists and idealists in QCA. Political Analysis, 26(2), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretical methods for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skaaning, S.E. (2011). Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124111404818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, S. (2014). QCA is of questionable value for policy research. Policy and Society, 33(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., & Maggetti, M. (2020). Designing research with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): approaches, challenges, and tools. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 356–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, B. (2007). States of welfare or state of workfare? welfare state restructuring in 16 capitalist democracies, 1985-2002. Policy & Politics, 35(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557307779657720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, B. (2012). The comparative advantages of FsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 168–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112442142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin.
   Google Scholar