Consent to data linkage for different data domains – the role of question order, question wording, and incentives

References

• Avendano, M., Scherpenzeel, A., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2011). Can biomarkers be collected in an Internet survey? A pilot study in the LISS panel. In Das, M., Ester, P. & Kaczmirek, L. (Eds.), Social research and the internet: Advances in applied methods and new research strategies (pp. 371–412). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Shiels, C., Stevenson, K., Fraser, R., & Stone, M. (2000). What proportion of patients refuse consent to data collection from their records for research purposes? The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 50(457), 655–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C., Chan, G. C., Leeper, T. J., & Becker, J. (2021). Rio: A Swiss-army knife for data file I/O. R Package Version 0.5.29.
   Google Scholar
• Christoph, B., Müller, G., Gebhardt, D., Wenzig, C., Trappmann, M., Achatz, J., Tisch, A., & Gayer, C. (2008). Codebook and documentation of the panel study’labour market and social security’(PASS): Vol. 1: Introduction and overview, wave 1 (2006/2007). Institut für Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung (IAB).
   Google Scholar
• Henry, L., & Wickham, H. (2022). purrr: Functional programming tools [R package version 0.3.5]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=purrr
   Google Scholar
• Hlavac, M. (2022). stargazer: Well-formatted regression and summary statistics tables [R package version 5.2.3]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer
   Google Scholar
• Jäckle, A., Burton, J., Couper, M. P., & Lessof, C. (2017). Participation in a mobile app survey to collect expenditure data as part of a large-scale probability household panel: Response rates and response biases. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex: Understanding Society Working Paper Series, 2017, 09.
   Google Scholar
• Keusch, F., Struminskaya, B., Antoun, C., Couper, M. P., & Kreuter, F. (2019). Willingness to participate in passive mobile data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(S1), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, F., Sakshaug, J. W., & Tourangeau, R. (2015). The framing of the record linkage consent question. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, M. W., Murphy, J., Schober, M. F., Buskirk, T. D., Hunter Childs, J., & Langer Tesfaye, C. (2014). Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: Executive summary of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2018). Ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772
   Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2022). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science [R package version 2.8.12]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K., & Shilton, K. (2016). Putting mobile application privacy in context: An empirical study of user privacy expectations for mobile devices. The Information Society, 32(3), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1153012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFall, S. L., Conolly, A., & Burton, J. (2014). Collecting biomarkers using trained interviewers. Lessons learned from a pilot study. Survey Research Methods, 8(1), 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2018). Respecting context to protect privacy: Why meaning matters. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(3), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9674-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2019). Contextual integrity up and down the data food chain. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 20(1), 221–256. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2019-0008
   Google Scholar
• Pascale, J. (2011). Requesting Consent to Link Survey Data to Administrative Records: Results from a Split-Ballot Experiment in the Survey of Health Insurance and Program Participation (SHIPP). Center for Survey Measurement Research and Methodology Directorate U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2011/adrm/ssm2011-03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Revilla, M., Couper, M. P., & Ochoa, C. (2018). Willingness of online panelists to perform additional tasks. Methods, Data, Analyses, 29. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2018.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakshaug, J. W., Couper, M. P., Ofstedal, M. B., & Weir, D. R. (2012). Linking survey and administrative records: Mechanisms of consent. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112460381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakshaug, J. W., & Kreuter, F. (2014). The effect of benefit wording on consent to link survey and administrative records in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakshaug, J. W., Schmucker, A., Kreuter, F., Couper, M. P., & Singer, E. (2019). The effect of framing and placement on linkage consent. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(S1), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakshaug, J. W., Tutz, V., & Kreuter, F. (2013). Placement, wording, and interviewers: Identifying correlates of consent to link survey and administrative data. Survey Research Methods, 7(2), 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber, H., Breuer, J., Beuthner, C., Gummer, T., Keusch, F., Siegers, P., Stier, S., & Weiß, B. (2022). Linking surveys and digital trace data: Insights from two studies on determinants of data sharing behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 185(2), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12954
   Google Scholar
• Silber, H., Gerdon, F., Bach, R., Kern, C., Keusch, F., & Kreuter, F. (2022). A preregistered vignette experiment on determinants of health data sharing behavior: Willingness to donate sensor data, medical records, and biomarkers. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2022.15
   Google Scholar
• Singer, E., & Ye, C. (2013). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645(1), 112–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212458082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, T., & Hill, M. E. (2003). Consumer privacy and the Internet in Europe: A view from Germany. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(7), 634–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760310506175
   Google Scholar
• Struminskaya, B., Toepoel, V., Lugtig, P., Haan, M., Luiten, A., & Schouten, B. (2021). Understanding willingness to share smartphone-sensor data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(3), 725–759. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzenbach, S., Burton, J., Couper, M. P., Crossley, T. F., Annette, J., Crossley, T. F., & Jäckle, A. (2021). Experiments on multiple requests for consent to data linkage in surveys. Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Zhang, Z., McArdle, J. J., & Salthouse, T. A. (2008). Investigating ceiling effects in longitudinal data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170802285941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenz, A., Jackle, A., & Couper, M. P. (2019). Willingness to use mobile technologies for data collection in a probability household panel. Survey Research Methods, 13(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., Yutani, H. … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
   Google Scholar