Impacts of cultural factors and mode of administration on item nonresponse for political questions in the European context

References

• Al Baghal, T., & Lynn, P. (2015). Using motivational statements in web-instrument design to reduce item-missing rates in a mixed-mode context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(2), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoni, M., Bela, D., & Vicari, B. (2019). Validating earnings in the German national educational panel study. determinants of measurement accuracy of survey questions on earnings. Methods, Data, Analyses, 13(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v1i1.308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beullens, K., Matsuo, H., Loosveldt, G., & Vandenplas, C. (2014). ‘Quality report for the European social survey, Round 6.’
   Google Scholar
• Callegaro, M., Manfreda, K. L., & Vehovar, V. (2015). Web survey methodology (First ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Callens, M., & Loosveldt, G. (2018). ‘Don’t Know’ responses to survey items on trust in police and criminal courts: A word of caution. In Survey methods: Insights from the field. FORS -. GESIS. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00002
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2015). Do attempts to improve respondent attention increase social desirability bias? Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(3), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corkrey, R., & Parkinson, L. (2002). A comparison of four computer-based telephone interviewing methods: Getting answers to sensitive questions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 34(3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195463
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Leeuw, E. D. (2018). Mixed-mode: Past, present, and future. Survey Research Methods, 12(2). Article 2. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2018.v12i2.7402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, E., Hox, J., & Huisman, M. (2003, January). Prevention and treatment of item nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 19(2), 153–176.
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, E. D., & Toepoel, V. (2018). Mixed-mode and mixed-device surveys. In D. L. Vannette & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of survey research (pp. 51–61). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-68
   Google Scholar
• Denniston, M., Brener, N., Kann, L., Eaton, D., McManus, T., Kyle, T., Roberts, A., Flint, K., & Ross, J. (2010, September). Comparison of paper-and- pencil versus web administration of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS): Participation, data quality, and perceived privacy and anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2009). Forskningshandboken—För småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant, G. B., & Steele, F. (2009). Multilevel modelling of refusal and non-contact in household surveys: Evidence from six UK government surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172(2), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00565.x
   Google Scholar
• Essig, L., & Winter, J. K. (2009). Item non-response to financial questions in household surveys: An experimental study of interviewer and mode effects*. Fiscal studies, 30(3‐4), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2009.00100.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EVS. 2020. European values study 2017: Integrated dataset (EVS 2017). GESIS Data Archive. ZA7500 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13560
   Google Scholar
• Frye, T., Gehlbach, S., Marquardt, K. L., & Reuter, O. J. (2017). Is Putin's popularity real? Post-Soviet Affairs, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2016.1144334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2015). Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: A meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1237–1259. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0533-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2008). Face-to-face versus web surveying in a high- internet-coverage population: differences in response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede Insights. (2021). Hofstede insights organisational culture consulting. Hofstede Insights. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, third edition (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A., Schofield, C. P., Buchanan, T., & Reips, U. -D. (2008, September). Measuring self-disclosure online: Blurring and non-response to sensitive items in web-based surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2158–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kays, K., Gathercoal, K., & Buhrow, W. (2012). Does survey format influence self-disclosure on sensitive question items? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 251–256. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A., & Blohm, M. (2009). ‘Item non-response in the European social survey,’ January. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/69564.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Narayan, S., & Smith, W. R. (1996). Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence. New Directions for Evaluation, 1996(70), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1033
   Google Scholar
• Kupek, E. (1998). Determinants of item nonresponse in a large national sex survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(6), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018721100903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Liu, M., & Hu, M. (2017). Relationship between future time orientation and item nonresponse on subjective probability questions: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(5), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117698572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M., Hox, J. J., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Maas, C. J. M. (2005). Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(3), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luijkx, R., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Gummer, T., Ernst Stähli, M., Frederiksen, M., Ketola, K., Reeskens, T., Brislinger, E., Christmann, P., Gunnarsson, S. Þ., Hjaltason, Á. B., Joye, D., Lomazzi, V., Maineri, A. M., Milbert, P., Ochsner, M., Pollien, A., Sapin, M., Solanes, I. … Wolf, C. (2021). The European values study 2017: On the way to the future using mixed-modes. European sociological review, 37(2), 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malter, F., & Börsch-Supan, A. (2015). ‘SHARE Wave 5: Innovations and methodology.’. http://www.share-project.org/fileadmin/pdf_documentation/Method_vol5_31March2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meitinger, K. M., & Johnson, T. P. (2020). Power, culture and item nonresponse in social surveys. In P. S. Brenner (Ed.), Understanding survey methodology: Sociological theory and applications (pp. 169–191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47256-6_8
   Google Scholar
• Pickery, J., Loosveldt, G., & Carton, A. (2001). The effects of interviewer and respondent characteristics on response behavior in panel surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124101029004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, L. (2018). ‘Non-Response to Politically-Sensitive Questions Across Political Regimes’. Central European University, Department of political science. master thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Publications Office of the European Union. (2020). ‘Quality report of the European Union labour force survey 2018 2020 edition.’
   Google Scholar
• Rässler, S., & Riphahn, R. T. (2006). Survey item nonresponse and its treatment. Allgemeines statistisches Archiv, 90(1), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0231-3
   Google Scholar
• Ratigan, K., & Rabin, L. (2020). Re-evaluating political trust: The impact of survey nonresponse in Rural China. The China Quarterly, 243, 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741019001231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riphahn, R. T., & Serfling, O. (2005). Item non-response on income and wealth questions. Empirical economics, 30(2), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-005-0247-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C., Gilbert, E., Allum, N., & Eisner, L. (2019). Research synthesis: Satisficing in surveys: A systematic review of the literature. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 598–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serfling, O. (2005, January). The interaction between item, questionnaire and unit nonresponse in the German SOEP. Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies/Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts- Und Sozialwissenschaften, 125(1), 195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P., Eichholz, M., & Skewes, E. A. (2002, June). Item non-response: Distinguishing between don’t know and refuse. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.2.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber, H., & Johnson, T. P. (2020). Culture and response behavior: An overview of cultural mechanisms explaining survey error. In P. S. Brenner (Ed.), Understanding survey methodology: Sociological theory and applications (pp. 67–86). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47256-64
   Google Scholar
• Struminskaya, B., Weyandt, K., & Bosnjak, M. (2015). The effects of questionnaire completion using mobile devices on data quality. Evidence from a probability-based general population panel. Methods, Data, Analyses, 9(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2015.014
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L., & Rosinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819322
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). ‘Sensitive Questions in Surveys. ’Tourangeau, Roger: Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, 1218, Psychological Bulletin. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.
   Google Scholar
• Vandeschrick, C., & Sanderson, J. -P. (2012). GGS Wave 1 Item Non-Response. 5. GGP Belgium Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, T., Curtin, R., & Jans, M. (2010, March). Trends in income nonresponse over two decades. Journal of Official Statistics, 26(1), 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar