An alternative approach to create and deploy discrete choice experiments

References

• Árvai, J., Kellon, D., León, R., Gregory, R., & Richardson, R. (2014). Structuring international development decisions: Confronting trade-offs between land use and community development in Costa Rica. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9495-4
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Pedersen, A. B., Nielsen, H. O., Mørkbak, M. R., Hasler, B., & Denver, S. (2011). Determinants of farmers’ willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones—a choice experiment study. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., Porteous, T., & Skåtun, D. (2018). What can discrete choice experiments do for you? Medical Education, 52(11), 1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coast, J., Al-janabi, H., Sutton, E. J., Horrocks, S. A., Vosper, A. J., Swancutt, D. R., & Flynn, T. N. (2012). Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: Issues and recommendations. Health Economics, 21(6), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G., Wiles, R., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2006). Research ethics and data quality: The implications of informed consent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595231
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa-goded, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & Ruto, E. (2010). What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, M., Rigby, D., Vass, C., Flynn, T., Louviere, J., & Payne, K. (2014). Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: A systematic review of the literature. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 7(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0048-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. (2010). Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., & Park, B. J. R. (2017). The moderating role of context in the effects of choice attributes on hotel choice: A discrete choice experiment. Tourism Management, 63, 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, D. L., Waldman, K. B., Richardson, R. B., Clay, D. C., & Snapp, S. (2016). Sustainable Intensification and Farmer Preferences for Crop System Attributes: Evidence from Malawi’s Central and Southern Regions. World Development, 87, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, Z., Darbani, J. M., Rezaei, A., Zacharias, J., & Yazdizadeh, A. (2017). Comparing text-only and virtual reality discrete choice experiments of neighbourhood choice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, A., Harrison, M., Watson, V., Street, D. J., Howard, K., Bansback, N., & Bryan, S. (2021). Respondent understanding in discrete choice experiments: A scoping review. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 14(1), 17–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00467-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D., Vass, C., & Payne, K. (2020). Opening the ‘Black Box’: An overview of methods to investigate the decision-making process in choice-based surveys. Patient, 13(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-019-00385-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silberg, T. R., Richardson, R. B., & Lopez, M. C. (2020). Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi. Food Security, 12(2), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervonen, T., Schmidt-Ott, T., Marsh, K., Bridges, J. F., Quaife, M., & Janssen, E. (2018). Assessing rationality in discrete choice experiments in health: An investigation into the use of dominance tests. Value in Health, 21(10), 1192–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar