Participation or direction? Dilemmas in utilising participatory methods

References

• Allen, J., Mohatt, G., Markstrom, C., Byers, L., & Novins, D. (2012). ‘Oh no, we are just getting to know you’: The relationship in research with children and youth in indigenous communities. Child Development Perspective, 6(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00199.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, L. (2015). Why everyday life matters: Class community and making life livable. Sociology, 49(5), 820–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515589292
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M. (1995). Visual research methods. Social research update. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html
   Google Scholar
• Barrera, P. (Ed.). (2011). Seeking sanctuary: Journeys of despair and hope. Communities First Ethnic Minorities Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, D. (1996). Artful inquiry: A symbolic constructivist approach to social science research. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(4), 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049600200403
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D., & Pahl, K. (2017). Co-production: Towards a utopian approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1348581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant objectivation. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell, J. (2013). Small change: Understanding cultural action as a resource for unlocking assets and building resilience in communities. Community Development Journal, 48(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bss059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, E., Elliott, E., & Williams, G. (2016). Performing the micro-social: Using theatre to debate research findings on everyday life, health and well-being. The Sociological Review, 64(4), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, E. (2001). Between geography and philosophy: What does it mean to be in the place-world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1998). Foreword in Holland, & J. Blackburn (Ed.), Whose Voice? Participatory Research and Policy Change. Intermediate Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Sciences & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (2018). What is Intersectionality? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViDtnfQ9FHc
   Google Scholar
• Dear Homeland. (2015). https://spreadthewordcornwall.wordpress.com/2015/03/26/dear-homeland-dear-cornwall-understanding-identity-through-letter-writing/
   Google Scholar
• Debord, G. (1956). Theory of the Dérive. Theory of the Dérive. http://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/theory.html
   Google Scholar
• Foucault. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). The University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Publishing Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1987). What is the 'dialogical method' of teaching?. In P. Freire & I. Shor (Eds.), A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education (pp. 102). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2008). Power is not an evil: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280801963045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T., & Smith, R. (2015). Care and repair and the politics of Urban kindness. Sociology, 49(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514546662
   Google Scholar
• Haviland, M. (2016). Side by side? Community art and the challenge of co-creativity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17(3), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210369310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2003). Doing qualitative research differently. Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Janes, J. (2016). Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power and community-based participatory action research. Action Research, 14(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315579129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesby, M. (2007). Spatialising participatory approaches: The contribution of geography to a mature debate. Environment and Planning, 39(12), 2813–2831. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotaska, J. (2019). Reconsidering collaboration: What constitutes good research with ethnic communities? Collaborative Anthropologies, University of Nebraska Press, 11(2), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2019.0005
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, L. (2005). Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art. Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W., & Chalfen, R. (2010). Lifting up voices of participatory research. Visual Studies, 25(3), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, A., & Newberry, J. (2020). Brown paper chronicles: Refusal and the limits of collaborative design work with Indigenous youth. Collaborative Anthropologies, University of Nebraska Press, 13(10), 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2020.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mannay, D. (2016). Visual, narrative and creative research methods. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or ornament? The social impact of participation in the arts. Comedia.
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, L. (2018). Critical discursive psychology and relational ethics: An uneasy tension. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 12(11), e12420. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12420
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, V., & Richards, M. (1996). The ethics of social research with children and young people – an overview. Children & Society, 10(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0860(199606)10:2<90:AID-CHI14>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Google Scholar
• Neighbourhood Story Project. (2022). https://www.neighborhoodstoryproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Crompton, M. (2018). Introducing Rotherham. In E. Campbell, K. Pahl, E. Pente, & Z. Rasool (Eds.), Re-imagining contested communities, (pp. 17–28). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R., Kesby, M., & Askins, K. (2012). The politics of social justice in neoliberal times: A reply to Slater. Area, 44(1), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrucka, P., Bassendowski, S., Bickford, D., & Goodfeather, E. V. (2012). Towards building consensus: revisiting key principles of community based participatory research within the first nations/aboriginal context. Open Journal of Nursing, 02(02), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2012.22022
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D., & Treacher, A. (1992). Clinical psychology observed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rasool, Z. (2018). Using poetry to engage the voices of women and girls in research. In E. Campbell, K. Pahl, E. Pente, & Z. Rasool (Eds.), Re-imagining contested communities (pp. 173–182). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (1995). The fallacy of easy access. Women’s Studies International Forum, 18(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(95)80056-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (2002). Techniques for telling the reflexive self. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 349–375). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Staikidis, K., Rex, E., Aulisa, G., & Lim, M. (2009). Learning outside the box: How Mayan pedagogy informs a community/university partnership. Art Education, 62(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519000
   Google Scholar
• Studdert, D., & Walkerdine, W. (2016). Rethinking community research. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert, D., & Walkerdine, V. (2017). Co-producing community arts. Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Takacs, D. (2003). How does your positionality bias your epistemology?. Thought and Action, 27, 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, S. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. (1997). Daddy’s girl: Young girls and popular culture. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2002). Subjectivity and qualitative method. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 179–198). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, C. (2015). ‘Participatory mapping: A literature review of community-based research and participatory planning’. Social Hub for Community and Housing Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion, Israel. http://web.mit.edu/cwarner/www/SocialHubfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar