Risk analysis and safety assessment in surgical robotics: A case study on a biopsy robot

References

• Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. P I Mech Eng H. 2000;214:129–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueth TC, Bier J. Robot assisted intervention in surgery. In: Gilsbach JM, Stiehl HS, eds. Neuronavigation: Neurosurgical and Computer Scientific Aspects. Berlin: Springer, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RH, Lavalle´e S, Burdea GC, Mo¨ sges R, eds. Computer Integrated Surgery. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Korb W, Engel D, Boesecke R, et al. Risk-analysis for a reliable and safe surgical robot. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium and Exhibition on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS 2003). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003: 766–70.
   Google Scholar
• Engel D, Raczkowsky J, Wo¨ rn H. A safe robot system for craniofacial surgery. In: International Conference On Robotics And Automation, (ICRA 2001), Seoul, Korea. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE Operations Center, 2001: 2020–4.
   Google Scholar
• Cain P, Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, et al. Safety considerations in a surgical robot. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1993;29:291–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider J. Risikomanagement in der Medizintechnik. Kalender WA, eds. Berichte aus dem Institut fu¨r Medizinische Physik. Aachen: Shaker, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Medical Device Directive, Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. European Community, Official Journal L 169, 12/07/1993, 1993: 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 61025: Fault tree analysis (FTA), 1990.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 601-1-4: Medical electrical equipment, Part 1: General requirements for safety; 4. Collateral Standard: Programmable electrical medical systems, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14971: Medical devices - Application of risk manage- ment to medical devices, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• EN ISO 14155-1+2:2003: Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects, Part 1+2, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fichtinger G, De Weese TL, Patriciu A, et al. A System for robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intraoperative CT guidance. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer D, Hein A, Lueth TC. RoboPoint - an autoclavable interactive miniature robot for surgery and interventional radiology. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium and Exhibition on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS 2003). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003: 555–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kronreif G, Fu¨ rst M. Robotic guidance for percutaneous interventions. In: Tar JK, ed. Proceedings of 11th International Workshop “Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region” (RAAD 2002), Balatonfu¨ red/Hungary. Budapest: Polytechnic, 2002: 277–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kronreif G, Fu¨ rst M, Kettenbach J, et al. Interactive localisator for percaneous interventions. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium and Exhibition on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS 2003). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003: 498–503.
   Google Scholar
• Kettenbach J, Kronreif G, Figl M, et al. Robot-assisted biopsy using ultrasound guidance: initial results from in vitro tests, Eur Radiol, submitted 2004 (accepted with minor revision).
   Google Scholar
• Cleary K, Stoianovici D, Patriciu A, et al. Robotically assisted nerve and facet blocks: a cadaveric study. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:821–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer Jr. CR, Maciunas RJ, Fitzpatrick JM. Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:753–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bale RJ, Lottersberger C, Vogele M, et al. A novel vacuum device for extremity immobilisation during digital angio- graphy: preliminary clinical experiences. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2890–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb W, Engel D, Boesecke R, et al. Safety of surgical robots in clinical trials. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Medical Robotics, Navigation and Visualization (MRNV 2004), Remagen, Germany, March 11-12, 2004. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers, 2004. (in print).
   Google Scholar
• Jannin P, Fitzpatrick JM, Hawkes DJ, et al. Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium and Exhibition on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS 2002). Berlin: Springer, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kronreif G, Fu¨ rst M, Kettenbach J, et al. Robotic guidance for percutaneous interventions. Adv Robotics. 2003;17:541–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley P. Techniques for development of safety-related software for surgical robots. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 1999;3:261–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng WS, Tan CK. On safety enhancements for medical robots. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 1996;54:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel M, Schmidt G, Schnuetgen G, Kalender WA. Risk management for a robot-assisted needle positioning system for interventional radiology. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium and Exhibition on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS 2004). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004: 549–54.
   Google Scholar