Intraoperative and interventional MRI: Recommendations for a safe environment

References

• Kettenbach J., Kacher D. F., Koskinen S. K., et al. Interventional and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000; 2: 661–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanal E., Borgstede J. P., Barkovich A. J. ACR White Paper on MR Safety: MR Safe Practice Guidelines. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1335–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanal E., Borgstede J. P., Barkovich J. A., et al. American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety: 2004 Update and Revisions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1111–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hushek S. G. Safety protocols for interventional MRI. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: 1143–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostenberg B., Stein M. Imaging evolution. Meeting the department's changing design requirements. Health Facil Manage 2003; 16: 42–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quick H. H., Ladd M. E., Hilfiker P. R., Paul G. G., et al. Autoperfused balloon catheter for intravascular MR imaging. JMRI 1999; 9: 428–44
   Google Scholar
• Buecker A., Spuentrup E., Schmitz‐Rode T., et al. Use of a nonmetallic guide wire for magnetic resonance‐guided coronary artery catheterization. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 656–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss S., Kuehne T., Brinkert F., et al. In vivo safe catheter visualization and slice tracking using an optically detunable resonant marker. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 860–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jolesz F. A. Future perspectives for intraoperative MRI. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2005; 16: 201–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolesz F. A., Hynynen K., McDannold N., Tempany C. M. MR imaging‐controlled focused ultrasound ablation: a noninvasive image‐guided surgery. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13: 545–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price R. R. The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: MR Imaging Safety Considerations. Radiographics 1999; 19: 1641–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shellock F. G., Crues J. V. MR Procedures: Biologic Effects, Safety, and Patient Care. Radiology 2004; 232: 635–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshan J. J., Duerk J. L. Update to pulse sequences for interventional MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13: 415–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shellock F. G. Magnetic Resonance Safety Update 2002: Implants and Devices. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2002; 16: 485–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaremba L. A. Criteria for significant risk investigations of magnetic resonance diagnostic devices., Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff 2003
   Google Scholar
• EC. EC Directive and the MR safety standard: IEC 60601‐2‐33. http://europaeuint/eur‐lex/2004
   Google Scholar
• Knopp M. V., Essig M., Debus J., Zabel H. J., et al. Unusual Burns of the lower extremities caused by a closed conduction loop in a patient at MR imgaging. Radiology 1996; 200: 772–75
   Google Scholar
• Keevil S. F., Gedroyc W., Gowland P., et al. Electromagnetic field exposure limitation and the future of MRI. Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 973
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill D. L., McLeish K., Keevil S. F. Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: 1135–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schenck J. F. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. JMRI 2000; 12: 2–19
   Google Scholar
• Budinger T. F. MR safety: past, present, and future from a historical perspective. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998; 6: 701–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ordidge R. J., Fullerton G., Norris D. G. MRI safety limits: is MRI safe or not?. Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 1–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmed S., Shellock F. G. Magnetic resonance imaging safety: implications for cardiovascular patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001; 3: 171–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonhomme‐Faivre L., Marion S., Forestier F., Santini R., et al. Effects of electromagnetic fields on the immune systems of occupationally exposed humans and mice. Arch Environ Health 2003; 58: 712–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozycki S. [Environment protection against electromagnetic fields. Legal point of view]. Med Pr 2004; 54: 285–7
   Google Scholar
• Engels H. IEC 60601‐2‐33 Safety Standard for MR Systems: Third Edition., International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2005; Workshop on MRI Safety, update, practical information, and future implications 5 and 6 November 2005, McLean, Virginia, USA
   Google Scholar
• Protection. ICoN‐IR. Medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients., Health Phys. 87. 197–216
   Google Scholar
• Formica D., Silvestri S. Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Biomed Eng Online 2005; 22: 11
   Google Scholar
• Bassen H., Schaefer D. J., Zaremba L., Bushberg J., et al. IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) Technical Information Statement “exposure of medical personnel to electromagnetic fields from open magnetic resonance imaging systems”. Health Phys 2005; 89: 684–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Wilde JP R. A., Price D. L. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005; 87: 335–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McRobbie D. W., Cross T. J. Occupational exposure to time varying magnetic gradient fields (dB/dt) in MRI and European limits. ISMRM Safety Workshop on MRI Safety: Update, Practical Information and Future Implications., [Online] http://www.ismm.org/workshops/safety05/index.htm [2005, November 5–6]
   Google Scholar
• Kanal E., Borgstede J. P., Barkovich J. A., et al. ACR Blue Ribbon Panel Response to the AJR Commentary by Shellock and Crues on the ACR White Paper on MR Safety. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 31–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellock F. G. Metallic Surgical Instruments for Interventional MRI Procedures: Evaluation of MR Safety. JMRI 2001; 13: 152–7
   Google Scholar
• Woods T. O. ASTM Standards for MRI: Present and Future. ISMRM Safety Workshop on MRI Safety: Update, Practical Information and Future Implications., [Online] http://www.ismm.org/workshops/safety05/index.htm [2005, November 5–6]
   Google Scholar
• Kanal E., Shellock F. G. Patient monitoring during clinical MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185: 623–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner J., Roos M., Brakeman P., Budinger T. Magnetohydrodynamics of blood flow. Magn Reson Med 1990; 16: 139–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao C. C., Krishna G. Anaesthetic considerations for magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Acad Med 1994; 23: 531–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason K. P. Instruments and Devices for Anesthesia and Sedation., International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2005; Workshop on MRI Safety, update, practical information, and future implications 5 and 6 November 2005, McLean, Virginia, USA
   Google Scholar
• Shellock F. G., Nogueira M., Morisoli M. MRI imaging and vascular access ports: ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 4: 481–4
   Google Scholar
• Farahani K., Sinha U., Sinha S., Chiu L. C., et al. Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1990; 14: 409–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ladd M. E., Erhart P., Debatin J. F., Romanowski B. J., et al. Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 646–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung D. A., Debatin J. F., Wildermuth S., Heske N., et al. Real time biplanar needle tracking for interventional MR imaging procedures. Radiology 1995; 197: 485–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgort D. R., Duerk J. L. A review of technical advances in interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: 1089–99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black P. M., Alexander E. r., Martin C., Moriarty T., et al. Craniotomy for tumor treatment in an intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging unit. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 423–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata N., Nabavi A., Warfield S., William W., et al. A volumetric optical flow method for measurement of brain deformation from intraoperative magnetic resonance images. 1999; 928–35, In Proc 2nd Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, Cambridge, UK
   Google Scholar
• Claus E. B., Horlacher A., Hsu L., et al. Survival rates in patients with low‐grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer 2005; 103: 1227–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colletti P. M. Size “H” Oxygen Cylinder: Accidental MR Projectile at 1.5 Tesla. JMRI 2004; 19: 141–3
   Google Scholar
• Rhode K. S., Semesant M., Brogan D., Hedge S., et al. A system for real‐time XMR guided cardiovascular intervention. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24: 1428–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar