Robotic suturing: Technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery

References

• Zeh H. J 3rd, Udelsman R. One hundred laparoscopic adrenalectomies: a single surgeon's experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 1012–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykypiel H., Wetscher G. J., Klingler P., Glaser K. The Nissen fundoplication: indication, technical aspects and postoperative outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390: 495–502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catarci M., Gentileschi P., Papi C., Carrara A., et al. Evidence‐based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 325–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland S., Angrisani L., Belachew M., Chevallier J. M., et al. Obesity surgery: evidence‐based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 200–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frede T., Stock C., Renner C., Budair Z., et al. Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques. J Endourol 1999; 13: 191–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J., Safi K. C., Subotic S., Teber D., et al. Robotics and telesurgery–an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2005; 14: 109–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy R. L., Waldman B., Hein D. W. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18: 785–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pasic R., Levine R. L. Laparoscopic suturing and ligation techniques. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 3: 67–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brody F., Holzman M., Tarnoff M., Oleynikov D., et al. Summaries of the SAGES 2007 reoperative minimally invasive surgery symposium. Surg Endosc 2008 Jan; 22: 232–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrell A. G., Heniford B. T. Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 239–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breedveld P., Stassen H. G., Meijer D. W., Jakimowicz J. J. Observation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2000; 10: 231–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berguer R., Smith W. D., Chung Y. H. Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1204–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berguer R. Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 458–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson S. L. Ergonomic hand tool design. Hand Clin 1993; 9: 299–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carswell C. M., Clarke D., Seales W. B. Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 2005; 12: 80–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gutt C. N., Oniu T., Mehrabi A., Kashfi A., et al. Robot‐assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1390–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pott P. P., Scharf H. P., Schwarz M. L. Today's state of the art in surgical robotics*. Comput Aided Surg 2005; 10: 101–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mantwill F., Schulz A. P., Faber A., Hollstein D., et al. Robotic systems in total hip arthroplasty–is the time ripe for a new approach?. Int J Med Robot 2005; 1: 8–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Margossian H., Garcia‐Ruiz A., Falcone T., Goldberg J. M., et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 530–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia‐Ruiz A., Smedira N. G., Loop F. D., Hahn J. F., et al. Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1997; 7: 277–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee E. C., Rafiq A., Merrell R., Ackerman R., et al. Ergonomics and human factors in endoscopic surgery: a comparison of manual vs telerobotic simulation systems. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1064–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanly E. J., Talamini M. A. Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 2004; 188((4A Suppl))19S–26S
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rassweiler J., Frede, Seemann O., Stock C., et al. Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 75–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubens G., Coveliers H., Balliu L., Ruppert M., et al. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1595–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolvenbach R., Schwierz E., Wasilljew S., Miloud A., et al. Total laparoscopically and robotically assisted aortic aneurysm surgery: a critical evaluation. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 771–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight C. G., Lorincz A., Cao A., Gidell K., et al. Computer‐assisted, robot‐enhanced open microsurgery in an animal model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005; 15: 182–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marecik S. J., Chaudhry V., Jan A., Pearl R. K., et al. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand‐sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 2007; 193: 349–55, discussion 55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang W., Shin P. R., Matin S., Thomas A. J Jr. Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 300–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bariol S. V., Stewart G. D., Tolley D. A. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength. J Endourol 2005; 19: 1127–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiff J., Li P. S., Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol 2004; 171: 1720–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuang W., Shin P. R., Oder M., Thomas A. J Jr. Robotic‐assisted vasovasostomy: a two‐layer technique in an animal model. Urology 2005; 65: 811–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D. B., Brewer J. D., Soper N. J. The influence of three‐dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6: 191–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satava R. M. 3‐D vision technology applied to advanced minimally invasive surgery systems. Surg Endosc 1993; 7: 429–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy M. L., Chen J. C., Moffit K., Corber Z., et al. Stereoscopic head‐mounted display incorporated into microsurgical procedures: technical note. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 392–5, discussion 5–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister J., Frank T. G., Cuschieri A., Wade N. J. Perceptual aspects of two‐dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 2001; 8: 12–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pietrabissa A., Scarcello E., Carobbi A., Mosca F. Three‐dimensional versus two‐dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994; 2: 315–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taffinder N., Smith S. G., Huber J., Russell R. C., et al. The effect of a second‐generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 1087–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan I. C., Dutson E., Garcia A., Vleugels T., et al. Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 879–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blavier A., Gaudissart Q., Cadiere G. B., Nyssen A. S. Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 115–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badani K. K., Bhandari A., Tewari A., Menon M. Comparison of two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting?. J Endourol 2005; 19: 1212–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruurda J. P., van Dongen K. W., Dries J., Borel Rinkes I. H., et al. Robot‐assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1937–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruurda J. P., Wisselink W., Cuesta M. A., Verhagen H. J., et al. Robot‐assisted versus standard videoscopic aortic replacement. A comparative study in pigs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27: 501–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruurda J. P., Broeders I. A. Robot‐assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 236–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk V., Gummert J. F., Walther T., Hayase M., et al. Quality of computer enhanced totally endoscopic coronary bypass graft anastomosis–comparison to conventional technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 260–4, discussion 4–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nio D., Bemelman W. A., Balm R., Legemate D. A. Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus‐Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1071–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyd W. D., Desai N. D., Kiaii B., Rayman R., et al. A comparison of robot‐assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 839–42, discussion 42–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Velthoven R. F., Ahlering T. E., Peltier A., Skarecky D. W., et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. Urology 2003; 61: 699–702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M., Hemal A. K., Tewari A., Shrivastava A., et al. The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004; 93: 715–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Velthoven R. F., Abbou C. C., Rassweiler J., Lee D., et al. Single knot anastomosis (SKA) for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multi‐center outcome survey of 5235 cases. J Endourol 2007; 22 Suppl.: A54 (abstract No. MP08‐9)
   Google Scholar
• Rashid H. H., Leung Y. Y., Rashid M. J., Oleyourryk G., et al. Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 68: 75–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shalhav A. L., Orvieto M. A., Chien G. W., Mikhail A. A., et al. Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology. Urology 2006; 68: 508–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino R. P., Zepeda M. A., Goldstein B. H., John C. R., et al. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 60–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Advincula A. P., Xu X., Goudeau S. T., Ransom S. B. Robot‐assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short‐term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 698–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senapati S., Advincula A. Surgical techniques: robot‐assisted laparoscopic myomectomy with the da Vinci® surgical system. Journal of Robotic Surgery 2007; 1: 69–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott D. S., Krambeck A. E., Chow G. K. Long‐term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 2006; 176: 655–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Degueldre M., Vandromme J., Huong P. T., Cadiere G. B. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 1020–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morino M., Pellegrino L., Giaccone C., Garrone C., et al. Randomized clinical trial of robot‐assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 553–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller‐Stich B. P., Reiter M. A., Wente M. N., Bintintan V. V., et al. Robot‐assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short‐term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1800–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti P. C., Coratti A., Angelini M., Sbrana F., et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 777–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weber P. A., Merola S., Wasielewski A., Ballantyne G. H. Telerobotic‐assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1689–94, discussion 95–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen G., Berger R., Horgan S. The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003; 13: 279–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nio D., Diks J., Bemelman W. A., Wisselink W., et al. Laparoscopic vascular surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 263–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nio D., Diks J., Linsen M. A., Cuesta M. A., et al. Robot‐assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease: early clinical experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 586–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Link R. E., Bhayani S. B., Kavoussi L. R. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 486–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotan Y., Cadeddu J. A., Gettman M. T. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 2004; 172((4 Pt 1))1431–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dharia Patel S. P., Steinkampf M. P., Whitten S. J., Malizia B. A. Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 2007 Dec 1, [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ficarra V., Cavalleri S., Novara G., Aragona M., et al. Evidence from robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 45–55, discussion 6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar