254
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 61-69 | Received 11 Oct 2018, Accepted 16 Jan 2019, Published online: 08 Mar 2019

References

  • Ceylan Y, Ucer O, Bozkurt O, et al. The effect of SWL and URS on health-related quality of life in proximal ureteral stones. Minim Invasive Ther and Allied Technol. 2018;27:148–152.
  • Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:468–474.
  • Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–482.
  • Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Novikov AB. Current prospects for improving the quality of life of patients with internal stents. Urologiia. 2018 May;(2):134–140.
  • Bellman GC. Re: Aghamir SMK, et al. Use of surgicel for sealing nephrostomy tract after totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2006;20:444.
  • Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J, et al. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2013;27:420–426.
  • Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
  • Aghamir SM, Modaresi SS, Aloosh M, et al. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole renal stone using subcostal access. J Endourol. 2011;25:583–586.
  • Chang CH, Wang CJ, Huang SW. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Urol Res. 2011;39:459–465.
  • Bhat S, Lal J, Paul F. A randomized controlled study comparing the standard, tubeless, and totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures for renal stones from a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Urol. 2017;33:310–314.
  • Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, et al. A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2008;180:612–614.
  • Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Gonen M, et al. Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41:541–545.
  • Kara C, Resorlu B, Bayindir M, et al. A randomized comparison of totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients. Urology. 2010;76:289–293.
  • Moosanejad N, Firouzian A, Hashemi SA, et al. Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49:e4878. DOI:10.1590/1414-431X20154878
  • Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless? Urology. 2010;75:1043–1046.
  • Choi SW, Kim KS, Kim JH, et al. Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost. J Endourol. 2014;28:1487–1494.
  • Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H. Tubeless and stentless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients requiring supracostal access. Urol Int. 2009;82:440–443.
  • Kara CRB, Bozkurt FO, et al. Totally tubeless (tubeless and stentless) percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. Turk J Urol. 2009;35:241–249.
  • Karami H, Gholamrezaie HR. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol. 2004;18:475–476.
  • Nalbant I, Ozturk U, Sener NC, et al. The comparison of standard and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Int Braz j Urol. 2012;38:795–801.
  • Yun SI, Lee YH, Kim JS, et al. Comparative study between standard and totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:785–789.
  • Goh M, Wolf JS. Jr. Almost totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: further evolution of the technique. J Endourol. 1999;13:177–180.
  • Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39:57–63.
  • Rassweiler J, Rassweiler MC, Kenngott H, et al. The past, present and future of minimally invasive therapy in urology: a review and speculative outlook. Minim Invasive Ther and Allied Technol. 2013;22:200–209.
  • Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, et al. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997;157:1578–1582. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64799-2
  • Amer T, Ahmed K, Bultitude M, et al. Standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Urol Int. 2012;88:373–382.
  • Gupta S, Das SK. Total tubeless ultra-mini supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A feasibility study. Turk J Urol. 2018;44:323–328. DOI:10.5152/tud.2018.48642
  • Kinn AC, Lykkeskov-Andersen H. Impact on ureteral peristalsis in a stented ureter. An experimental study in the pig. Urol Res. 2002;30:213–218.
  • Fischer KM, Louie M, Mucksavage P. Ureteral Stent Discomfort and Its Management. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:64
  • Aghamir SM, Hosseini SR, Gooran S. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2004;18:647–648.
  • Singh I, Singh A, Mittal G. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid? J Endourol. 2008;22:427–434.
  • Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol. 2004;172:565–567.
  • Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-bore or pigtail catheter? J Endourol. 2000;14:735–738.
  • Jou YC, Cheng MC, Sheen JH, et al. Cauterization of access tract for nephrostomy tube-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2004;18:547–549.
  • Lee DI, Uribe C, Eichel L, et al. Sealing percutaneous nephrolithotomy tracts with gelatin matrix hemostatic sealant: initial clinical use. J Urol. 2004;171:575–578.
  • Dogan HS, Şahin A, Çetinkaya Y, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol. 2002;16:649–653.
  • Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18:715–722.
  • Hu G, Guo Z, Liu H, et al. A novel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique: safety and efficacy report. Scand J Urol. 2015;49:174–180.
  • Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, et al. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24:1075–1079.
  • Ferakis N, Stavropoulos M. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urol Ann. 2015;7:141–148.
  • Zeng G, Zhu W, Lam W. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience. AJUR. 2018;5:295–302.
  • Wang J, Zhao C, Zhang C, et al. Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BJU International. 2012;109:918–924.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.