Innovations in hysteroscopic surgery: expanding the meaning of “in-office”

References

• Salazar CA, Isaacson KB. Office operative hysteroscopy: an update. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor M. New technologies and innovations in hysteroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(7):951–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkatout I, Mettler L, Gunther V, et al. Safety and economical innovations regarding surgical treatment of fibroids. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25(6):301–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Muscia V, et al. Endometrial preparation with Dienogest before hysteroscopic surgery: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(3):661–667. 
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchini M, Lippi G, Calzolari S, et al. Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy: clinical and economic data in decision making. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(3):418–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gizzo S, Saccardi C, Di Gangi S, et al. Secondary amenorrhea in severe Asherman’s syndrome: step by step fertility retrieval by Bettocchi’s hysteroscope: some considerations. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014;23(2):115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdusattarova K, Mettler L, Alkatout I, et al. Endoscopic treatment of symptomatic fibroids at reproductive age and beyond. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017;26(6):355–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dealberti D, Riboni F, Cosma S, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of office-based polypectomy with a 16F mini-resectoscope: a multicenter clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(3):418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papalampros P, Gambadauro P, Papadopoulos N, et al. The mini-resectoscope: a new instrument for office hysteroscopic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):227–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommaso S, Cavallotti C, Malvasi A, et al. A qualitative and quantitative study of the innervation of the human non pregnant uterus. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2016;18(2):140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dealberti D, Riboni F, Prigione S, et al. New mini-resectoscope: analysis of preliminary quality results in outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(2):349–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casadio P, Gubbini G, Morra C, et al. Channel-like 360 degrees isthmocele treatment with a 16F mini-resectoscope: a step-by-step technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(7):1229–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K. The Intrauterine Morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(1):62–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG, Sapia F, Rapisarda AMC, et al. Hysteroscopic morcellation of submucous myomas: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6848250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noventa M, Ancona E, Quaranta M, et al. Intrauterine morcellator devices: the icon of hysteroscopic future or merely a marketing image? A systematic review regarding safety, efficacy, advantages, and contraindications. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(10):1289–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Cheng J, Ansari SH, et al. Hysteroscopic tissue removal systems for the treatment of intrauterine pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018;10(4):207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigatti G, Ansari SH, Di W. The 19 Fr. Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver (IBS(R)): a clinical and technical update. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018;10(3):161–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigatti G, Ferrario C, Rosales M, et al. A 4-cm G2 cervical submucosal myoma removed with the IBS(R) Integrated Bigatti Shaver. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9(4):453–456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haimovich S, Lopez-Yarto M, Urresta Avila J, et al. Office hysteroscopic laser enucleation of submucous myomas without mass extraction: a case series study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nappi L, Sorrentino F, Angioni S, et al. Feasibility of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy using a new dual wavelengths laser system (DWLS): preliminary results of a pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(1):3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimovich S, Mancebo G, Alameda F, et al. Feasibility of a new two-step procedure for office hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas: results of a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168(2):191–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG.The biopsy snake grasper sec. VITALE: a new tool for office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.014.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with office hysteroscopy and its interrater/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1392–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B, Bettocchi S, et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopic metroplasty with the combination of presurgical 3-dimensional ultrasonography and a novel graduated intrauterine palpator: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(4):557–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwin A, Pfeifer SM. Reproductive surgery for mullerian anomalies: a review of progress in the last decade. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):408–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Pity Ski K, et al. Role of morphologic characteristics of the uterine septum in the prediction and prevention of abnormal healing outcomes after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(7):1420–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Chodankar R, Gupta JK. Endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health (Lond Engl)). 2016;12(1):45–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burns S, Soltan O. Evaluation of minitouch endometrial ablation device compared to currently available endometrial ablation systems for outpatient setting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):S135.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur Y, Thakur V, Gupta N, et al. Minitouch outpatient endometrial ablation procedure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6):S183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scordalakes C, delRosario R, Shimer A, et al. Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study. IJWH. 2018;10:137–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remondi C, Sesti F, Sorrenti G, et al. Hysteroscopic polypectomy: a comparison between 22 Fr and 26 Fr resectoscopes under paracervical block anesthesia, a randomized controlled study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018;27(6):339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencaglia L, Carri G, Prasciolu C, et al. Feasibility and complications in bipolar resectoscopy: preliminary experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22(1):50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG, Caruso S, Vitagliano A, et al. The value of virtual reality simulators in hysteroscopy and training capacity: a systematic review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;1–9. doi:10.1080/13645706.2019.1625404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo R, Santangelo F, Gordts S, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018;10(3):115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortman M. “See-and-Treat” hysteroscopy in the management of endometrial polyps. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:177–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amer-Cuenca JJ, Marin-Buck A, Vitale SG, et al. Non-pharmacological pain control in outpatient hysteroscopies. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;1–10. doi:10.1080/13645706.2019.1576054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar