Design of non-equal-strut stent hoops for structural optimization of thoracic aortic stent-grafts

References

• Tazaki J, Inoue K, Higami H, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with branched Inoue Stent-Graft for arch aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(5):1340–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao P, Verzini F, De P, et al. Different types of thoracic endografts. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2009;50(4):483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratimenos T, Antonopoulos CN, Tomais D, et al. Repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms with Ankura Thoracic Stent-graft. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(4):996–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okita Y, Ando M, Minatoya K. Early and long-term results of surgery for aneurysms of the thoracic aorta in septuagenarians and octogenarians. Eur J Cardio-Thorac. 1999;16(3):317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinstreuer C, Li Z, Basciano CA, et al. Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent-grafts. J Biomech. 2008;41(11):2370–2378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockler D, Brunkwall J, Taylor PR. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch pathologies with the conformable thoracic aortic graft: early and 2 year results from a European multicentre registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc. 2016;51:791–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harky A, Chan JSK, Wong CHM, et al. Current challenges in open versus endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(5):1582–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassagnes L, Pérignon R, Amokrane F, et al. Aortic stent-grafts: Endoleak surveillance. Diagn Interv Imag. 2016;97(1):19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarins CK, Bloch DA, Crabtree T, et al. Stent-graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(6):1264–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosquera VX, Marini M, Fraga-Manteiga D, et al. Repair of late retrograde I-type aortic dissection after TEVAR: causes and management. J Card Surg. 2016;31(3):164–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janosi RA, Tsagakis K, Bettin M. Thoracic aortic aneurysm expansion due to late distal stent-graft-induced new entry. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2015;85:E43–E53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boufi M, Guivier-Curien C, Loundou AD, et al. Morphological analysis of healthy aortic arch. Eur J Vasc Endovasc. 2017;53(5):663–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Fu W, Wang Y, et al. Stent-graft-induced new entry after endovascular repair for Stanford II-type aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(6):1450–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo H-C, Youn Y-N, Ko Y-G, et al. Comparison of open surgical versus hybrid endovascular repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms with distal arch involvement. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(6):3548–3557.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canaud L, Joyeux F, Berthet JP, et al. Impact of stent-graft development on outcome of endovascular repair of acute traumatic transection of the thoracic aorta. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18(4):485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin D, Demanget N, Badel P. Deployment of stent-grafts in curved aneurysmal arteries: toward a predictive numerical tool. Int J Numer Meth Bio. 2015;31:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Miao W, Feng Z. Influence of structural design of M type Ti-Ni alloy vascular stents on performance. Chin J Rare Metals. 2017;41:936–942.
   Google Scholar
• Demanget N, Duprey A, Badel P, et al. Finite element analysis of the mechanical performances of 8 marketed aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(4):523–535.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demanget N, Avril S, Badel P, et al. Computational comparison of the bending behavior of aortic stent-grafts. J Mech Biomed. 2012;5(1):272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demanget N, Latil P, Orgéas L, et al. Severe bending of two aortic stent-grafts：an experimental and numerical mechanical analysis. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(12):2674–2686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senf B, von Sachsen S, Neugebauer R, et al. The effect of stent-graft oversizing on radial forces considering nitinol wire behavior and vessel characteristics. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36(11):1480–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Gu X, Hu F, et al. Effects of strut numbers on biomechanical properties of Z-shaped stent-grafts. J Med Biomech. 2017;32:115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Yan S, Si Y, et al. Effects of different geometric parameters on flexibility of Z-shaped stent-grafts. J Med Biomech. 2019;34:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• DeBock S, Iannacconea F, DeSantis G, et al. Virtual evaluation of stent-graft deployment: a validated modeling and simulation study. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2012;13:129–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Miao W, Feng Z, et al. Ti-Ni alloy vascular stents’ supporting performance with different design geometric parameters. Chin J Rare Mater. 2016;41:8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lin J, Guidoin R, Du J, et al. An in vitro twist fatigue test of fabric stent-grafts supported by Z-stents vs. ringed stents. Materials. 2016;9(2):113–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeckel D, Pelton A, Dueri T. Self-expanding nitinol stents：material and design considerations. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(2):292–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Feng H, Liu J, et al. Simulation on flexibility of vascular stent and grey correlation analysis. J Med Biomech. 2016;31:206–212.
   Google Scholar
• Shin I-Y, Chung Y-G, Shin W-H, et al. A morphometric study on cadaveric aortic arch and its major branches in 25 Korean adults: the perspective of endovascular surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;44(2):78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Wu X, Kelly M, et al. Fabrication and optimal design of biodegradable polymeric stents for aneurysms treatments. JFB. 2017;8(1):8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Guan Y, Lin J, Dong Z, et al. Comparative study of the effect of structural parameters on the flexibility of endovascular stent grafts. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018;3046576:10
   Google Scholar
• Xue W, Gao J, Lin J, et al. Deformation mechanisms of prototype composite braided stent-grafts in bending fatigue for peripheral artery application. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2018;78:74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar GP, Kabinejadian F, Liu J, et al. Simulated bench testing to evaluate the mechanical performance of new carotid stents. Artif Organs. 2017;41(3):267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarins C, Taylor C. Endovascular device design in the future: transformation from trial and error to computational design. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16(Suppl. 1):I12–I21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirdes MMC, Vleggaar FP, Beule M, et al. In vitro evaluation of the radial and axial force of self-expanding esophageal stents. Endoscopy. 2013;45:997–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DB, Choi H, Joo SM, et al. A comparative reliability and performance study of different stent designs in terms of mechanical properties: foreshortening, recoil, radial force, and flexibility. Artif Organs. 2013;37(4):368–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X, Yu K, Lu L, et al. A study on the effects of struts of Z-shaped stent-grafts on radial forces. ASME 2017 design of medical devices conference - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, Monday 10 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto T, Matsubara Y, Aoyagi Y, et al. Radial force measurement of endovascular stents: Influence of stent design and diameter. Vascular. 2016;24(2):171–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Dixon SR, Webster MW, et al. Stent longitudinal flexibility: a comparison of 13 stent designs before and after balloon expansion. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2000;50(1):120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar