Robotic surgery in gynecology: is the future already here?

References

• Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(4):331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkatout I, Mettler L, Maass N, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecology. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016;17(4):224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitas G, Proppe L, Alkatout I, et al. Accuracy of frozen section at early clinical stage of endometrioid endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis in Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(1):169–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Ajao MO, Clark NV, et al. Outpatient hysterectomy volume in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(1):130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–1904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitas G, Alkatout I, Proppe L, et al. Surgical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted hysterectomy. Int J Med Robot. 2021;17(3):e2225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitas G, Alkatout I, Allahqoli L, et al. Severe direct and indirect complications of morcellation after hysterectomy or myomectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2020.1802292
   Google Scholar
• Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(3):407–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D, et al. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD011422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Soto E, Chuang L, et al. Integration of robotics into two established programs of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer appears to decrease surgical complications. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013;24(1):21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, et al. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:119.e1–119.e12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto E, Lo Y, Friedman K, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial? J Gynecol Oncol. 2011;22(4):253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi S, Avall-Lundqvist E, Legerstam B, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2017;79:81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narducci F, Bogart E, Hebert T, et al. Severe perioperative morbidity after robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: results of the randomized ROBOGYN-1004 trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(2):382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(3):286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandadi S, Gadzinski JA, Lee S, et al. Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(1):102–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shashoua AR, Gill D, Locher SR. Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS. 2009;13(3):364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience. JSLS. 2009;13(2):125–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi S, Avall-Lundqvist E, Brandberg Y, et al. Lymphedema, serious adverse events, and imaging 1 year after comprehensive staging for endometrial cancer: results from the RASHEC trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(1):86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartos P, Struppl D, Trhlik M, et al. Da vinci robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology: a critical interim appraisal. Ceska Gynekol. 2007;72:354–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113(1):36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:360.e1–360.e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, et al. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1422–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan JM, Goodheart MJ, McDonald M, et al. Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:49.e1–49.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitas G, Freytag D, Allahqoli L, et al. Lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer - achieving more with less? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2021;1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2020.1868009
   Google Scholar
• Galaal K, Donkers H, Bryant A, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10:CD006655.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group LAP2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(7):695–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD006655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westermann LB, Crisp CC, Mazloomdoost D, et al. Comparative perioperative pain and recovery in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction versus robotic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23:95–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, et al. Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(12):1224–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1005–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkatout I, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Keckstein J, et al. Endometriosis: a concise practical guide to current diagnosis and treatment. J Turkish German Gynecol Assoc. 2018;19(3):173–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SH, Li ZA, Du XP. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;43:422–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restaino S, Mereu L, Finelli A, et al. Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(5):687–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, et al. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1501–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID. Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(1):5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes. 2013;37(6):889–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddib A, Danakas A, Hughes S, et al. Influence of morbid obesity on surgical outcomes in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. J Gynecol Surg. 2014;30(2):81–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kissane LM, Calixte R, Grigorescu B, et al. Impact of obesity on robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):36–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunes M, Johannesson U, Habel H, et al. Effects of obesity on peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus conventional hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(2):228–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachem LE, Acholonu UC, Jr, Nezhat FR. Postoperative pain and recovery after conventional laparoscopy compared with robotically assisted laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):547–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, et al. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):604–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:368.e1–368.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):1010–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan O, Ozer A, Kostu B, et al. Comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function after abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(1):39–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elessawy M, Schneekloth S, Gunther V, et al. Postoperative telephone-based questionnaire on quality of life after robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JCM. 2020;9(9):2849.
   Google Scholar
• Kane S, Stepp KJ. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery hysterectomy using robotic lightweight endoscope assistants. J Robot Surg. 2010;3(4):253–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez S, Mulla ZD, Hernandez L, et al. A comparison of outcomes between robotic-assisted, single-site laparoscopy versus laparoendoscopic single site for benign hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):84–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S, et al. Robotic single site staging in endometrial cancer: a multi-institution study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(10):1506–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, et al. Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1043–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizza E, Chiofalo B, Cutillo G, et al. Robotic single site radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018;29(1):e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley de Meritens A, Kim J, Dinkelspiel H, et al. Feasibility and learning curve of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(2):323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matanes E, Lauterbach R, Mustafa-Mikhail S, et al. Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: our experience with the first 25 cases. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(3):e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado G, Calagna G, Cutillo G, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of the robotic single-site hysterectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(1):194–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek J, Lee JD, Kong TW, et al. Robotic single-site versus laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal tumours: a propensity score-matching analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2016;12(4):694–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309(7):689–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, et al. Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol. 2012;187(2):638–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang S, Wu Z, et al. Review of surgical robotic systems for keyhole and endoscopic procedures: state of the art and perspectives. Front Med. 2020;14(4):382–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas BC, Slack M, Hussain M, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access renal and prostate surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(2):444–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar