120
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Office intrauterine morcellation for retained products of conception

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 323-328 | Received 28 Jan 2023, Accepted 02 Jun 2023, Published online: 26 Jul 2023

References

  • Trojano G, Damiani GR, Casavola VC, et al. The role of hysteroscopy in evaluating postmenopausal asymptomatic women with thickened endometrium. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018;7:6–9. Erratum in: gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018;7:92.
  • Damiani GR, Tartagni M, Crescini C, et al. Intussusception and incarceration of a fallopian tube: report of 2 atypical cases, with differential considerations, clinical evaluation, and current management strategies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(2):246–249. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.009.
  • Trojano G, Olivieri C, Tinelli R, et al. Conservative treatment in early stage endometrial cancer: a review. Acta Biomed. 2019;90:405–410.
  • Caponio M, Addati T, Popescu O, et al. p16(ink4a) protein expression in endocervical, endometrial and metastatic adenocarcinomas of extra-uterine origin: diagnostic and clinical considerations. Cancer Biomark. 2014;14(2–3):169–175. doi: 10.3233/CBM-130326.
  • Luerti M, Vitagliano A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. Effectiveness of hysteroscopic techniques for endometrial polyp removal: The italian multicenter trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(6):1169–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.12.002.
  • Damiani RG, Muzzupapa G, Trojano G, et al. Remodelling of anterior arches of post-caesarean niche (ROAN) with intrauterine morcellator: it is possible? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;306(6):1845–1846. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06709-8.
  • Hamerlynck TW, van Vliet HA, Beerens AS, et al. Hysteroscopic morcellation versus loop resection for removal of placental remnants: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(7):1172–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.828.
  • Noventa M, Ancona E, Quaranta M, et al. Intrauterine morcellator devices: The icon of hysteroscopic future or merely a marketing image? a systematic review regarding safety, efficacy, advantages, and contraindications. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(10):1289–1296. doi: 10.1177/1933719115578929.
  • Hamerlynck TW, Blikkendaal MD, Schoot BC, et al. An alternative approach for removal of placental remnants: hysteroscopic morcellation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(6):796–802. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.024.
  • Ben-Ami I, Melcer Y, Smorgick N, et al. A comparison of reproductive outcomes following hysteroscopic management versus dilatation and curettage of retained products of conception. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127(1):86–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.003.
  • Capmas P, Lobersztajn A, Duminil L, et al. Operative hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: efficacy and subsequent fertility. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(3):151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.005.
  • Smorgick N, Barel O, Fuchs N, et al. Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: meta-analysis and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173:19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.020.
  • Rein DT, Schmidt T, Hess AP, et al. Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue is superior to ultrasound-guided curettage. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(6):774–778. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.003.
  • Hamel CC, van Wessel S, Carnegy A, et al. Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception-a scoping review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(12):2135–2143. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14229.
  • Damiani GR, Seghezzi U, Gaetani M, et al. Intrauterine bone fragments and endometrial plaque of osseous metaplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(8):1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01388.x.
  • Alonso Pacheco L, Timmons D, Saad Naguib M, et al. Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: a single center observational study. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019;11:217–222.
  • Hecht JL, Baergen R, Ernst LM, et al. Classification and reporting guidelines for the pathology diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders: recommendations from an expert panel. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(12):2382–2396. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0569-1.
  • Wada Y, Takahashi H, Suzuki H, et al. Expectant management of retained products of conception following abortion: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;260:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.02.028.
  • Foreste V, Gallo A, Manzi A, et al. Hysteroscopy and retained products of conception: an update. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021;10(4):203–209. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_125_20.
  • Damiani GR, Pellegrino A, Seghezzi U, et al. A dangerous trigger. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165(1):133; author reply 133–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.014.
  • Faivre E, Deffieux X, Mrazguia C, et al. Hysteroscopic management of residual trophoblastic tissue and reproductive outcome: a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(4):487–490. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.011.
  • Cooper DB, Menefee GW. Dilation and curettage. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. PMID: 33760550.
  • Smorgick N, Rabinovitch I, Levinsohn-Tavor O, et al. Two-step hysteroscopy for management of morbidly adherent retained products of conception. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(3):669–674. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05246-1.
  • Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K. The intra uterine morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(1):62–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.011.
  • D’hoore E, D'hoore L, Van den Berghe S, et al. Operative hysteroscopy in the minimally invasive management of interstitial pregnancy and interstitially retained products of conception: a case report and systematic literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;265:54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.025.
  • Damiani GR, Muzzupapa G, Villa M, et al. Focus on intrauterine morcellator. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021;10(2):135–136. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_156_20.
  • van Wessel S, Coryn N, van Vliet H, et al. Reproductive and obstetric outcomes After hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(4):840–846. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.016.
  • Vitale SG, Parry JP, Carugno J, et al. Surgical and reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(2):204–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.028.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.