Ureteroscopic lithotripsy with pressure-measuring ureteral access sheath for large ureteral stones

References

• Zeng G, Mai Z, Xia S, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study. BJU Int. 2017;120(1):109–116. doi:10.1111/bju.13828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai M, Sun Y, Buchholz N, et al. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1395–1399. doi:10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):131–139. doi:10.1089/end.2013.0436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunc L, Kupeli B, Senocak C, et al. Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment? Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(3):759–764. doi:10.1007/s11255-006-9084-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang X, Yang Z, Wang X, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023;18(1):42–51. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2022.119776.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen H, Zhu Z, Cui Y, et al. Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(3):1056–1063. doi:10.21037/tau-20-1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanlangendonck R, Landman J. Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31(1):71–81. doi:10.1016/S0094-0143(03)00095-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol. 2001;165(3):789–793. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66527-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, et al. Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology. 2002;60(5):784–788. doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01948-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):246–255. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chang X, Li J, et al. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(6):902–926. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, et al. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):33–36. doi:10.1089/089277904322836631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winship B, Wollin D, Carlos E, et al. The rise and fall of high temperatures during ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2019;33(10):794–799. doi:10.1089/end.2019.0084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croghan SM, Skolarikos A, Jack GS, et al. Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: a systematic review of range, variables and implications. BJU Int. 2023;131(3):267–279. doi:10.1111/bju.15764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Liu SW, Deng XL, et al. The effect and safety assessment of monitoring ethanol concentration in exhaled breath combined with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure on the absorption of perfusion fluid during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;56(1):45–53. doi:10.1007/s11255-023-03776-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Song L, Xie D, et al. Suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure. J Urol. 2015;195:e782–e782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Song L, Xie D, et al. Suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure: a porcine model. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9:6563–6568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Song L, Xie D, et al. Animal experimental study to test application of intelligent pressure control device in monitoring and control of renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscopy. Urology. 2016;91: 242.e11–242.e15. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Song L, Xie D, et al. A novel flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure: an initial experience of 93 cases. J Endourol. 2016;30(10):1067–1072. doi:10.1089/end.2015.0770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torricelli FCM, Monga M, Marchini GS, et al. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(4):645–654. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JS, Xie GH, Yuan HS, et al. Guide sheath-assisted ureteroscope lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi: an observational study on 81 cases. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16:3459–3463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Cui Y, Zeng F, et al. Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones. World J Urol. 2018;37(5):921–929. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2455-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng G, Wang D, Zhang T, et al. Modified access sheath for continuous flow ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a preliminary report of a novel concept and technique. J Endourol. 2016;30(9):992–996. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu ZH, Liu TZ, Wang XH, et al. Negative-pressure ureteroscopic holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Urol Int. 2020;104(9-10):752–757. doi:10.1159/000507266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar