Effects of combined dimension reduction and tabulation on the simulations of a turbulent premixed flame using a large-eddy simulation/probability density function method

References

• S.B. Pope, PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11 (1985), pp. 119–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.C. Haworth, Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36 (2010), pp. 168–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, Small scales, many species and the manifold challenges of turbulent combustion, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Peters, Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• R. Cao and S.B. Pope, The influence of chemical mechanisms on PDF calculations of nonpremixed piloted jet flames, Combust. Flame 143 (2005), pp. 450–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R.H. Sheikhi, T.G. Drozda, P. Givi, F.A. Jaberi, and S.B. Pope, Large eddy simulation of a turbulent nonpremixed piloted methane jet flame (Sandia Flame D), Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 549–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Raman and H. Pitsch, A consistent LES/filtered-density function formulation for the simulation of turbulent flames with detailed chemistry, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007), pp. 1711–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R.H. Sheikhi, P. Givi, and S.B. Pope, Frequency-velocity-scalar filtered mass density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 21 (2009), Paper No. 075102. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3153907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.B. Nik, S.L. Yilmaz, P. Givi, M.R.H. Sheikhi, and S.B. Pope, Simulation of Sandia Flame D using velocity-scalar filtered density function, AIAA J. 48 (2010), pp. 1513–1522.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wang and S.B. Pope, Large eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a turbulent CH4/H2/N2 jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 1319–1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Hiremath, S.R. Lantz, H. Wang, and S.B. Pope, Large-scale parallel simulations of turbulent combustion using combined dimension reduction and tabulation of chemistry, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yang, H. Wang, S.B. Pope, and J.H. Chen, Large-eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a non-premixed CO/H2 temporally evolving jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1241–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gupta, D.C. Haworth, and M.F. Modest, Turbulence–radiation interactions in large-eddy simulations of luminous and nonluminous nonpremixed flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1281–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.H. Rowinski and S.B. Pope, An investigation of mixing in a three-stream turbulent jet, Phys. Fluids 25 (2013), Paper No. 105105. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4822434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Poinsot and D. Veynante, Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 3rd ed., e-Learning@cerfacs, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• T.S. Kuan, R.P. Lindstedt, and E.M. Vaos, Advances in Confined Detonations and Pulse Detonation Engines, G.D. Roy, ed., Torus Press, Moscow, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt and E.M. Vaos, Transported PDF modeling of high-Reynolds-number premixed turbulent flames, Combust. Flame 145 (2006), pp. 495–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Stöllinger and S. Heinz, Evaluation of scalar mixing and time scale models in PDF simulations of a turbulent premixed flame, Combust. Flame 157 (2010), pp. 1671–1685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.T. Zoller, M.L. Hack, and P. Jenny, A PDF combustion model for turbulent premixed flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1421–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Borghi, On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames, in Recent Advances in the Aerospace Sciences, C. Bruno and S. Casci, eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1985, pp. 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• H. Pitsch, Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38 (2006), pp. 453–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Hiremath, S. Lantz, H. Wang, and S.B. Pope, Computationally-efficient and scalable parallel implementation of chemistry in simulations of turbulent combustion, Combust. Flame 159 (2012), pp. 3096–3109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Hiremath, Z. Ren, and S.B. Pope, Combined dimension reduction and tabulation strategy using ISAT-RCCE-GALI for the efficient implementation of combustion chemistry, Combust. Flame 158 (2011), pp. 2113–2127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation, Combust. Theory Model. 1 (1997), pp. 41–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bodenstein and S.C. Lind, Geschwindigkeit der bildung des bromwasserstoffs aus seinen elementen, Z. Phys. Chem. 57 (1906), pp. 168–175.
   Google Scholar
• M.D. Smooke (ed.), Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane–Air Flames, Lecture Notes in Physics 384, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Ren, S.B. Pope, A. Vladimirsky, and J.M. Guckenheimer, The invariant constrained equilibrium edge preimage curve method for the dimension reduction of chemical kinetics, J. Chem. Phys. 124 (2006), Paper No. 114111. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2177243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Keck and D. Gillespie, Rate-controlled partial equilibrium method for treating reacting gas-mixtures, Combust. Flame 17 (1971), pp. 237–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Keck, Rate-controlled constrained equilibrium theory of chemical reactions in complex systems, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 16 (1990), pp. 125–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, Gibbs function continuation for the stable computation of chemical equilibrium, Combust. Flame 139 (2004), pp. 222–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sjunnesson, S. Olovsson, and B. Sjöblom, Validation rig – a tool for flame studies, in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Nottingham, UK, 1–6 September 1991, Vol. 1, AIAA, Washington, DC, 1991, pp. 385–393.
   Google Scholar
• A. Sjunnesson, P. Henrikson, and C. Löfström, CARS measurements and visualization of reacting flows in a bluff body stabilized flame, in Proceedings of the 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Nashville, TN, 6–8 July 1992, AIAA Paper No. 1992-3650.
   Google Scholar
• C. Fureby and S.I. Möller, Large eddy simulation of reacting flows applied to bluff body stabilized flames, AIAA J. 33 (1995), pp. 2339–2347.
   Google Scholar
• C. Fureby, Large eddy simulation of combustion instabilities in a jet engine afterburner model, Combust. Sci. Technol. 161 (2000), pp. 213–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Nilsson and X.S. Bai, Effects of flame stretch and wrinkling on co formation in turbulent premixed combustion, Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002), pp. 1873–1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Giacomazzi, V. Battaglia, and C. Bruno, The coupling of turbulence and chemistry in a premixed bluff-body flame as studied by LES, Combust. Flame 138 (2004), pp. 320–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wang and X.S. Bai, Large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed flames using level-set G-equation, Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 583–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Fureby, Comparison of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for premixed turbulent combustion, in Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 8–1 January 2007, AIAA Paper No. 2007-1413.
   Google Scholar
• E. Baudoin, R. Yu, K.J. Nogenmyr, X.S. Bai, and C. Fureby, Comparison of LES models applied to a bluff body stabilized flame, in Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, 5–8 January 2009, AIAA Paper No. 2009-1178.
   Google Scholar
• B. Manickam, J. Franke, S.P.R. Muppala, and F. Dinkelacker, Large-eddy simulation of triangular-stabilized lean premixed turbulent flames: Quality and error assessment, Flow Turbul. Combust. (2012), pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• T. Ma, O.T. Stein, N. Chakraborty, and A.M. Kempf, A posteriori testing of algebraic flame surface density models for LES, Combust. Theory Model. 17 (2013), pp. 431–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.P. Popov, H. Wang, and S.B. Pope, Specific volume coupling and convergence properties in hybrid particle/finite volume algorithms for turbulent reactive flows, J. Comput. Phys., submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• S. Viswanathan, H. Wang, and S.B. Pope, Numerical implementation of mixing and molecular transport in LES/PDF studies of turbulent reacting flows, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011), pp. 6916–6957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Desjardins, G. Blanquart, G. Balarac, and H. Pitsch, High order conservative finite difference scheme for variable density low Mach number turbulent flows, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008), pp. 7125–7159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Morinishi, T.S. Lund, O.V. Vasilyev, and P. Moin, Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow, J. Comput. Phys. 143 (1998), pp. 90–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.D. Pierce and P. Moin, Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion, J. Fluid Mech. 504 (2004), pp. 73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W.H. Cabot, A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model, Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dynam. 3 (1991), pp. 1760–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.K. Lilly, A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method, Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dynam. 4 (1992), pp. 633–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kang, G. Iaccarino, F. Ham, and P. Moin, Prediction of wall-pressure fluctuation in turbulent flows with an immersed boundary method, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009), pp. 6753–6772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. McDermott and S.B. Pope, A particle formulation for treating differential diffusion in filtered density function methods, J. Comput. Phys. 226 (2007), pp. 947–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, P.P. Popov, and S.B. Pope, Weak second-order splitting schemes for Lagrangian Monte Carlo particle methods for the composition PDF/FDF transport equations, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010), pp. 1852–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Pitsch, FlameMaster, a C++ computer program for 0D combustion and 1D laminar flame calculations, Institut für Technische Mechanik, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 1998; software available at http://www.stanford.edu.bases-doc.univ-lorraine.fr/group/pitsch/CES.htm.
   Google Scholar
• M. Klein, A. Sadiki, and J. Janicka, A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 186 (2003), pp. 652–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Kempf, S. Wysocki, and M. Pettit, An efficient, parallel low-storage implementation of Klein’s turbulence generator for LES and DNS, Comput. & Fluids 60 (2012), pp. 58–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Konnov, Detailed reaction mechanism for small hydrocarbons combustion: release 0.5, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gokulakrishnan, R. Bikkani, M.S. Klassen, R.J. Roby, and B.V. Kiel, Influence of turbulence–chemistry interaction in blow-out predictions of bluff-body stabilized flames, in Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, 5–8 January 2009, AIAA Paper No. 2009-1179.
   Google Scholar
• I.A. Dodoulas and S. Navarro-Martinez, Large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent flames using the probability density function approach, Flow Turbul. Combust. 90 (2013), pp. 645–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Hiremath, Z. Ren, and S.B. Pope, A greedy algorithm for species selection in dimension reduction of combustion chemistry, Combust. Theory Model. 14 (2010), pp. 619–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar