A direct approach to generalised multiple mapping conditioning for selected turbulent diffusion flame cases

References

• V.R. Kuznetsov and V. Sabel'nikov, Turbulence and Combustion, 1st ed., P.A. Libby, English edition editor, Hemisphere, New York, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• P. Libby and F. Williams, Turbulent Combustion: Fundamental Aspects and a Review, Academic Press, London, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bilger, Turbulent flows with nonpremixed reactants, chapter 3 in Turbulent Reacting Flows, P. Libby and F. Williams, eds., Springer, 1980, pp. 65–113.
   Google Scholar
• A. Klimenko and R. Bilger, Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 25 (1999), pp. 595–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Peters, Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• S. Pope, PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11 (1985), pp. 119–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Haworth, Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36 (2010), pp. 168–259. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Colucci, F.A. Jaberi, P. Givi, and S.B. Pope, Filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows, Phys. Fluids 10 (1998), pp. 499–515. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.869537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Fox, Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• S. Heinz, Statistical Mechanics of Turbulent Flows, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• V. Raman and H. Pitsch, A consistent LES/filtered-density function formulation for the simulation of turbulent flames with detailed chemistry, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007), pp. 1711–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Cleary, A.Y. Klimenko, J. Janicka, and M. Pfitzner, A sparse-Lagrangian multiple mapping conditioning model for turbulent diffusion flames, in Proc. Combust. Inst., 32 (2009), pp. 1499–1507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Navarro-Martinez and A. Kronenburg, LES-CMC simulations of a lifted methane flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 1509–1516. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Jones and V. Prasad, Large eddy simulation of the Sandia flame series (D–F) using the Eulerian stochastic field method, Combust. Flame 157 (2010), pp. 1621–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Echekki and E. Mastorakos (eds.), Turbulent Combustion Modelling. Advances, New Trends and Perspectives, Vol. 95 of Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2011. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0412-1.
   Google Scholar
• J. Villermaux and J. Devillon, Representation de la coalescence et de la redispersion des domaines de segregation dans un fluide par un modele d'interaction phenomenologique, in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2–4 May 1972, Amsterdam, Elsevier, New York, 1972, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• C. Dopazo and E. O’Brien, An approach to the autoignition of a turbulent mixture, Acta Astronautica 1 (1974), pp. 1239–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Curl, Dispersed phase mixing: I. Theory and effects in simple reactors, AIChE J. 9 (1963), pp. 175–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Janicka, W. Kolbe, and W. Kollmann, Closure of the transport equation for the probability density function of turbulent scalar fields, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 4 (1977), pp. 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Lindstedt, S. Louloudi, and E. Váos, Joint scalar probability density function modeling of pollutant formation in piloted turbulent jet diffusion flames with comprehensive chemistry, Proc. Combust. Inst. 28 (2000), pp. 149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Subramaniam and S. Pope, A mixing model for turbulent reactive flows based on Euclidean minimum spanning trees, Combust. Flame 115 (1998), pp. 487–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Klimenko and S. Pope, The modeling of turbulent reactive flows based on multiple mapping conditioning, Phys. Fluids 15 (2003), pp. 1907–1925. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1575754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Klimenko, Matching conditional moments in PDF modelling of nonpremixed combustion, Combust. Flame 143 (2005), pp. 369–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cleary and A. Klimenko, Multiple mapping conditioning: a new modelling framework for turbulent combustion, Chapter 7 in Turbulent Combustion Modelling. Advances, New Trends and Perspectives, T. Echekki and E. Mastorakos, eds., Vol. 95 of Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2011, pp. 143–173. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0412-1.
   Google Scholar
• A.P. Wandel and A.Y. Klimenko, Testing multiple mapping conditioning mixing for Monte Carlo probability density function simulations, Phys. Fluids 17 (2005), Article ID 128105. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2147609.
   Google Scholar
• M. Cleary and A. Kronenburg, Multiple mapping conditioning for extinction and reignition in turbulent diffusion flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007), pp. 1497–1505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Vogiatzaki, M. Cleary, A. Kronenburg, and J. Kent, Modeling of scalar mixing in turbulent jet flames by multiple mapping conditioning, Phys. Fluids 21 (2009), Article ID 025105. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3081553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Vogiatzaki, A. Kronenburg, S. Navarro-Martinez, and W. Jones, Stochastic multiple mapping conditioning for a piloted, turbulent jet diffusion flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 1523–1531. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Vaishnavi and A. Kronenburg, Multiple mapping conditioning of velocity in turbulent jet flames, Combust. Flame 157 (2010), pp. 1863–1865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.B. Devaud, I. Stankovic, and B. Merci, Deterministic multiple mapping conditioning (MMC) applied to a turbulent flame in Large Eddy Simulation (LES), Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1213–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Pope, A model for turbulent mixing based on shadow-position conditioning, Phys. Fluids 25 (2013), Article ID 110803. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4818981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Wandel and R.P. Lindstedt, Hybrid multiple mapping conditioning modeling of local extinction, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1365–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Sundaram, A.Y. Klimenko, M.J. Cleary, and U. Maas, Prediction of NOx in premixed high-pressure lean methane flames with an MMC-partially stirred reactor, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 1517–1525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Cleary and A.Y. Klimenko, A generalised multiple mapping conditioning approach for turbulent combustion, Flow Turbul. Combust. 82 (2009), pp. 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.Y. Klimenko, Lagrangian particles with mixing. II. Sparse-Lagrangian methods in application for turbulent reacting flows, Phys. Fluids 21 (2009), Article ID 065102. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3147927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ge, M. Cleary, and A. Klimenko, A comparative study of Sandia flame series (D–F) using sparse-Lagrangian MMC modelling, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1325–1332. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Norris and S. Pope, Turbulent mixing model based on ordered pairing, Combust. Flame 83 (1991), pp. 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Barlow and J. Frank, Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames, Symp. (Int.) Combust. 27 (1998), pp. 1087–1095.
   Google Scholar
• R. Cabra, T. Myhrvold, J. Chen, R. Dibble, A. Karpetis, and R. Barlow, Simultaneous laser raman-rayleigh-lif measurements and numerical modeling results of a lifted turbulent h2/n2 jet flame in a vitiated coflow, Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002), pp. 1881–1888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Dialameh, M. Cleary, and A. Klimenko, A multiple mapping conditioning model for differential diffusion, Phys. Fluids 26 (2014), Article ID 025107. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4864101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.Y. Klimenko, MMC modelling and fluctuations of the scalar dissipation, in 2003 Australian Symposium on Combustion & The 8th Australian Flame Days, 8–9 December 2003, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• A. Klimenko, Matching the conditional variance as a criterion for selecting parameters in the simplest multiple mapping conditioning models, Combust. Flame 16 (2004), pp. 4754–4757.
   Google Scholar
• R.O. Fox, On velocity-conditioned scalar mixing in homogeneous turbulence, Phys. Fluids 8 (1996), Article ID 2678, pp. 2678–2691. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.869054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ge, M. Cleary, and A. Klimenko, Sparse-Lagrangian FDF simulations of Sandia flame E with density coupling, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2011), 1401–1409.
   Google Scholar
• A.Y. Klimenko, On simulating scalar transport by mixing between Lagrangian particles, Phys. Fluids 19 (2007), Article ID 031702. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2711233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.Y. Klimenko and M.J. Cleary, Convergence to a model in sparse-Lagrangian FDF simulations, Flow Turbul. Combust. 85 (2010), p. 567–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.Y. Klimenko, Lagrangian particles with mixing. I. Simulating scalar transport, Phys. Fluids 21 (2009), Article ID 065101. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3147925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Vogiatzaki, S. Navarro-Martinez, S. De, and A. Kronenburg, Mixing modelling framework based on multiple mapping conditioning for the prediction of turbulent flame extinction, Flow Turbul. Combust. 95 (2015), pp. 501–517. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10494-015-9626-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cleary and A. Klimenko, A detailed quantitative analysis of sparse-Lagrangian filtered density function simulations in constant and variable density reacting jet flows, Phys. Fluids 23 (2011), Article ID 115102. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3657085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.Y. Klimenko, On the relation between the conditional moment closure and unsteady flamelets, Combust. Theory Model. 5 (2001), pp. 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kempf, F. Flemming, and J. Janicka, Investigation of lengthscales, scalar dissipation, and flame orientation in a piloted diffusion flame by LES, Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 557–565. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ge, Generalised multiple mapping conditioning for turbulent combustion simulation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• G. Smith, D. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C. Bowman, R. Hanson, S. Song, W.C. Gardiner Jr, V. Lissianski, and Z. Qin, Gri-Mech 3.0. Available at http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/.
   Google Scholar
• R. Gordon, S. Starner, A. Masri, and R. Bilger, Further characterisation of lifted hydrogen and methane flames issuing into a vitiated coflow, in Proceedings of the 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Combustion (ASPACC 2005), 17–20 July 2005, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Wu, S. Starner, and R. Bilger, Lift-off heights of turbulent H2/N2 jet flames in a vitiated co-flow, in Proceedings of the 2003 Australian Symposium on Combustion & The 8th Australian Flame Days, 8–9 December 2003, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• R.R. Cao, S.B. Pope, and A.R. Masri, Turbulent lifted flames in a vitiated coflow investigated using joint PDF calculations, Combust. Flame 142 (2005), pp. 438–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Mueller, T.J. Kim, R.A. Yetter, and F.L. Dryer, Flow reactor studies and kinetic modeling of the H2/O2 reaction, Int. J. Chem. Kinetics 31 (1999), pp. 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Navarro-Martinez and A. Kronenburg, Flame stabilization mechanisms in lifted flames, Flow Turbul. Combust. 87 (2011), pp. 377–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Yetter, F.L. Dryer, and H. Rabitz, A comprehensive reaction mechanism for carbon monoxide/hydrogen/oxygen kinetics, Combust. Sci. Technol. 79 (1991), pp. 97–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, Z. Zhao, A. Kazakov, and F.L. Dryer, An updated comprehensive kinetic model of hydrogen combustion, Int. J. Chem. Kinetics 36 (2004), pp. 566–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar