Joint-scalar transported PDF modelling of soot in a turbulent non-premixed natural gas flame

References

• M. von Smoluchowski, Three lectures on diffusion, Brownian movement and coagulation of colloidal particles, Phys. Zeitschrift 17 (1916), pp. 557–571. 585–599.
   Google Scholar
• F. Gelbard, Y. Tambour, and J.H. Seinfeld, Sectional representations for simulating aerosol dynamics, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 76 (1980), pp. 541–556. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(80)90394-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.T. Nguyen, F. Laurent, R.O. Fox, and M. Massot, Solution of population balance equations in applications with fine particles: Mathematical modeling and numerical schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 325 (2016), pp. 129–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Smooke, M.B. Long, B.C. Connelly, M.B. Colket, and R.J. Hall, Soot formation in laminar diffusion flames, Combust. Flame 143 (2005), pp. 613–628. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kumar and D. Ramkrishna, On the solution of population balance equations by discretization – I. A fixed pivot technique, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51 (1996), pp. 1311–1332. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(96)88489-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Bhatt and R.P. Lindstedt, Analysis of the impact of agglomeration and surface chemistry models on soot formation and oxidation, Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 713–720. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt and B.B.O. Waldheim, Modeling of soot particle size distributions in premixed stagnation flow flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1861–1868. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.05.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.L. Manzello, D.B. Lenhert, A. Yozgatligil, M.T. Donovan, G.W. Mulholland, M.R. Zachariah, and W. Tsang, Soot particle size distributions in a well-stirred reactor/plug flow reactor, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007), pp. 675–683. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.B. Lenhert and S.L. Manzello, Effects of benzene and naphthalene addition on soot inception in a well-stirred reactor/plug flow reactor, Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 657–664. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.D. Abid, N. Heinz, E.D. Tolmachoff, D.J. Phares, C.S. Campbell, and H. Wang, On evolution of particle size distribution functions of incipient soot in premixed ethylene–oxygen–argon flames, Combust. Flame 154 (2008), pp. 775–788. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.D. Abid, E.D. Tolmachoff, D.J. Phares, H. Wang, Y. Liu, and A. Laskin, Size distribution and morphology of nascent soot in premixed ethylene flames with and without benzene doping, Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 681–688. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.D. Abid, J. Camacho, D.A. Sheen, and H. Wang, Quantitative measurement of soot particle size distribution in premixed flames – The burner-stabilized stagnation flame approach, Combust. Flame 156 (2009), pp. 1862–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Park and S.N. Rogak, A novel fixed-sectional model for the formation and growth of aerosol agglomerates, J. Aerosol Sci. 35 (2004), pp. 1385–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Frenklach and S.J. Harris, Aerosol dynamics modeling using the method of moments, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 118 (1987), pp. 252–261. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(87)90454-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Frenklach, Method of moments with interpolative closure, Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002), pp. 2229–2239. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00113-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. McGraw, Description of aerosol dynamics by the quadrature method of moments, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 27 (1997), pp. 255–265. doi: 10.1080/02786829708965471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.L. Marchisio and R.O. Fox, Solution of population balance equations using the direct quadrature method of moments, J. Aerosol Sci. 36 (2005), pp. 43–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Mueller, G. Blanquart, and H. Pitsch, Hybrid method of moments for modeling soot formation and growth, Combust. Flame 156 (2009), pp. 1143–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Yuan and R.O. Fox, Conditional quadrature method of moments for kinetic equations, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011), pp. 8216–8246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Salenbauch, A. Cuoci, A. Frassoldati, C. Saggese, T. Faravelli, and C. Hasse, Modeling soot formation in premixed flames using an extended conditional quadrature method of moments, Combust. Flame 162 (2015), pp. 2529–2543. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.M. Leung, R.P. Lindstedt, and W.P. Jones, A simplified reaction mechanism for soot formation in nonpremixed flames, Combust. Flame 87 (1991), pp. 289–305. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(91)90114-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt, Simplified soot nucleation and surface growth steps for non-premixed flames, in Soot Formation in Combustion: Mechanisms and Models, H. Bockhorn, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994, pp. 417–441.
   Google Scholar
• M. Fairweather, W.P. Jones, H.S. Ledin, and R.P. Lindstedt, Predictions of soot formation in turbulent, non-premixed propane flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 24 (1992), pp. 1067–1074. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80126-8
   Google Scholar
• M. Fairweather, W.P. Jones, and R.P. Lindstedt, Predictions of radiative transfer from a turbulent reacting jet in a cross-wind, Combust. Flame 89 (1992), pp. 45–63. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(92)90077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11 (1985), pp. 119–192. doi: 10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.P. Popov and S.B. Pope, Large eddy simulation/probability density function simulations of bluff body stabilized flames, Combust. Flame 161 (2014), pp. 3100–3133. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt and S.A. Louloudi, Joint scalar transported probability density function modeling of turbulent methanol jet diffusion flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002), pp. 2147–2154. doi: 10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80261-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt and S.A. Louloudi, Joint-scalar transported PDF modeling of soot formation and oxidation, Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 775–783. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.W.J. Peeters, P.P.J. Stroomer, J.E. de Vries, D.J.E.M. Roekaerts, and C.J. Hoogendoorn, Comparative experimental and numerical investigation of a piloted turbulent natural-gas diffusion flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 25 (1994), pp. 1241–1248. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80764-2
   Google Scholar
• The University of Adelaide, International sooting flame (ISF) workshop, Available at http://www.adelaide.edu.au/cet/isfworkshop/.
   Google Scholar
• P.P.J. Stroomer, J.E. de Vries, and T.H. van der Meer, Effects of small- and large-scale structures in a piloted jet diffusion flame, Flow Turbul. Combust. 62 (1999), pp. 53–68. doi: 10.1023/A:1009998109665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Nooren, Stochastic modeling of turbulent natural-gas flames, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• P.A. Nooren, M. Versluis, T.H. van der Meer, R.S. Barlow, and J.H. Frank, Raman–Rayleigh–LIF measurements of temperature and species concentrations in the Delft piloted turbulent jet diffusion flame, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 71 (2000), pp. 95–111. doi: 10.1007/s003400000278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.H. Qamar, Z.T. Alwahabi, Q.N. Chan, G.J. Nathan, D. Roekaerts, and K.D. King, Soot volume fraction in a piloted turbulent jet non-premixed flame of natural gas, Combust. Flame 156 (2009), pp. 1339–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Mueller and H. Pitsch, LES model for sooting turbulent nonpremixed flames, Combust. Flame 159 (2012), pp. 2166–2180. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Donde, V. Raman, M.E. Mueller, and H. Pitsch, LES/PDF based modeling of soot-turbulence interactions in turbulent flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1183–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Nooren, H.A. Wouters, T.W.J. Peeters, D. Roekaerts, U. Maas, and D. Schmidt, Monte Carlo PDF modelling of a turbulent natural-gas diffusion flame, Combust. Theory Model. 1 (1997), pp. 79–96. doi: 10.1080/713665231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Merci, B. Naud, and D. Roekaerts, Flow and mixing fields for transported scalar PDF simulations of a piloted jet diffusion flame (‘Delft Flame III’), Flow Turbul. Combust. 74 (2005), pp. 239–272. doi: 10.1007/s10494-005-4872-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Merci, D. Roekaerts, and B. Naud, Study of the performance of three micromixing models in transported scalar PDF simulations of a piloted jet diffusion flame (‘Delft Flame III’), Combust. Flame 144 (2006), pp. 476–493. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Roekaerts, B. Merci, and B. Naud, Comparison of transported scalar PDF and velocity-scalar PDF approaches to ‘Delft flame III’, Compt Rend Mécan 334 (2006), pp. 507–516. doi: 10.1016/j.crme.2006.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Habibi, B. Merci, and D. Roekaerts, Turbulence radiation interaction in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of nonpremixed piloted turbulent laboratory-scale flames, Combust. Flame 151 (2007), pp. 303–320. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ayache and E. Mastorakos, Conditional moment closure/large eddy simulation of the Delft-III natural gas non-premixed jet flame, Flow Turbul. Combust. 88 (2012), pp. 207–231. doi: 10.1007/s10494-011-9368-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Louloudi, Transported probability density function modeling of turbulent jet flames, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• D.B. Spalding, GENMIX – A General Computer Program for Two-Dimensional Parabolic Phenomena, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• C.G. Speziale, S. Sarkar, and T.B. Gatski, Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: An invariant dynamical systems approach, J. Fluid Mech. 227 (1991), pp. 245–272. doi: 10.1017/S0022112091000101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.J. Daly and F.H. Harlow, Transport equations in turbulence, Phys. Fluids 13 (1970), pp. 2634–2649. doi: 10.1063/1.1692845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Janicka, W. Kolbe, and W. Kollmann, Closure of the transport equation for the probability density function of turbulent scalar fields, J. Non-Equilibr Thermodyn. 4 (1979), pp. 25–66. doi: 10.1515/jnet.1979.4.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.L. Grosshandler, RADCALA: Narrow-band model for radiation calculations in a combustion environment, Tech. Rep., NIST Technical Note 1402, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Hall, Computation of the radiative power loss in a sooting diffusion flame, Appl. Opt. 27 (1988), pp. 809–811. doi: 10.1364/AO.27.000809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Frenklach and H. Wang, Detailed mechanism and modeling of soot particle formation, in Soot Formation in Combustion: Mechanisms and Models, H. Bockhorn, ed., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1994, pp. 165–192.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kazakov and M. Frenklach, Dynamic modeling of soot particle coagulation and aggregation: Implementation with the method of moments and application to high-pressure laminar premixed flames, Combust. Flame 114 (1998), pp. 484–501. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00322-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.E. Pratsinis, Simultaneous nucleation, condensation, and coagulation in aerosol reactors, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 124 (1988), pp. 416–427. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(88)90180-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ü.Ö. Köylü, G.M. Faeth, T.L. Farias, and M.G. Carvalho, Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates, Combust. Flame 100 (1995), pp. 621–633. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)00147-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vemury and S.E. Pratsinis, Self-preserving size distributions of agglomerates, J. Aerosol Sci. 26 (1995), pp. 175–185 doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(94)00103-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.K. Friedlander, Smoke, Dust, and Haze, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• W.P. Jones and R.P. Lindstedt, Global reaction schemes for hydrocarbon combustion, Combust. Flame 73 (1988), pp. 233–249. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(88)90021-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.B. Sunderland, Ü.Ö. Köylü, and G.M. Faeth, Soot formation in weakly buoyant acetylene-fueled laminar jet diffusion flames burning in air, Combust. Flame 100 (1995), pp. 310–322. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)00137-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Lin, P.B. Sunderland, and G.M. Faeth, Soot nucleation and growth in acetylene air laminar coflowing jet diffusion flames, Combust. Flame 104 (1996), pp. 369–375. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(95)00225-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.B. Sunderland and G.M. Faeth, Soot formation in hydrocarbon air laminar jet diffusion flames, Combust. Flame 105 (1996), pp. 132–146. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(95)00182-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Kent and D. Honnery, Soot and mixture fraction in turbulent diffusion flames, Combust. Sci. Technol. 54 (1987), pp. 383–398. doi: 10.1080/00102208708947062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Coppalle and D. Joyeux, Temperature and soot volume fraction in turbulent diffusion flames: Measurements of mean and fluctuating values, Combust. Flame 96 (1994), pp. 275–285. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)90014-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Xu, K.-C. Lin, and G.M. Faeth, Soot formation in laminar premixed methane/oxygen flames at atmospheric pressure, Combust. Flame 115 (1998), pp. 195–209. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00017-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.J. Harris and A.M. Weiner, Determination of the rate constant for soot surface, Combust. Sci. Technol. 32 (1983), pp. 267–275. doi: 10.1080/00102208308923661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.B. Popovitcheva, N.M. Persiantseva, M.E. Trukhin, G.B. Rulev, N.K. Shonija, Y. Ya. Buriko, A.M. Starik, B. Demirdjian, D. Ferry, and J. Suzanne, Experimental characterization of aircraft combustor soot microstructure, surface area, porosity and water adsorption, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2 (2000), pp. 4421–4426. doi: 10.1039/b004345l
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.J. Rockne, G.L. Taghon, and D.S. Kosson, Pore structure of soot deposits from several combustion sources, Chemosphere 41 (2000), pp. 1125–1135. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00040-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Frenklach and H. Wang, Detailed modelling of soot particle nucleation and growth, Proc. Combust. Inst. 23 (1990), pp. 1559–1566. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80426-1
   Google Scholar
• M.L. Potter, Detailed chemical kinetic modelling of propulsion fuels, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• H. Guo, P.M. Anderson, and P.B. Sunderland, Optimized rate expressions for soot oxidation by OH and O, Fuel 172 (2016), pp. 248–252. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.B. Lee, M.W. Thring, and J.M. Beér, On the rate of combustion of soot in a laminar soot flame, Combust. Flame 6 (1962), pp. 137–145. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(62)90082-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.P. Fenimore and G.W. Jones, Oxidation of soot by hydroxyl radicals, J. Phys. Chem. 71 (1967), pp. 593–597. doi: 10.1021/j100862a021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.G. Neoh, Soot burnout in flames, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• M.-L. Chan, K.N. Moody, J.R. Mullin, and A. Williams, Low-temperature oxidation of soot, Fuel 66 (1987), pp. 1694–1698. doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(87)90365-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Garo, G. Prado, and J. Lahaye, Chemical aspects of soot particles oxidation in a laminar methane–air diffusion flame, Combust. Flame 79 (1990), pp. 226–233. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(90)90134-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Puri, R.J. Santoro, and K.C. Smyth, The oxidation of soot and carbon monoxide in hydrocarbon diffusion flames, Combust. Flame 97 (1994), pp. 125–144. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Puri, R.J. Santoro, and K.C. Smyth, Erratum, Combust. Flame 102 (1995), pp. 226–228. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(95)00045-8
   Google Scholar
• K.J. Higgins, H. Jung, D.B. Kittelson, J.T. Roberts, and M.R. Zachariah, Size-selected nanoparticle chemistry: Kinetics of soot oxidation, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002), pp. 96–103. doi: 10.1021/jp004466f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Xu, A.M. El-Leathy, C.H. Kim, and G.M. Faeth, Soot surface oxidation in hydrocarbon/air diffusion flames at atmospheric pressure, Combust. Flame 132 (2003), pp. 43–57. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00459-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.H. Kim, A.M. El-Leathy, F. Xu, and G.M. Faeth, Soot surface growth and oxidation in laminar diffusion flames at pressures of 0.1–1.0 atm, Combust. Flame 136 (2004), pp. 191–207. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.H. Kim, F. Xu, and G.M. Faeth, Soot surface growth and oxidation at pressures up to 8.0 atm in laminar nonpremixed and partially premixed flames, Combust. Flame 152 (2008), pp. 301–316. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kalogirou and Z. Samaras, Soot oxidation kinetics from TG experiments, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 99 (2010), pp. 1005–1010. doi: 10.1007/s10973-010-0707-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.N. Sharma, L. Pahalagedara, A. Joshi, S.L. Suib, and A.B. Mhadeshwar, Experimental study of carbon black and diesel engine soot oxidation kinetics using thermogravimetric analysis, Energy Fuels 26 (2012), pp. 5613–5625. doi: 10.1021/ef3009025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Roth, O. Brandt, and S. von Gersum, High temperature oxidation of suspended soot particles verified by CO and CO measurements, Proc. Combust. Inst. 23 (1990), pp. 1485–1491. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80417-0
   Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt, S.A. Louloudi, and E.M. Váos, Joint scalar probability density function modeling of pollutant formation in piloted turbulent jet diffusion flames with comprehensive chemistry, Proc. Combust. Inst. 28 (2000), pp. 149–156. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80206-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.S. Kuan, R.P. Lindstedt, and E.M. Váos, Higher moment based modeling of turbulence enhanced explosion kernels in confined fuel–air mixtures, in Advances in Confined Detonations and Pulse Detonation Engines, G. Roy, ed., Torus Press, Moscow, 2003, pp. 17–40.
   Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt and E.M. Váos, Transported PDF modeling of high-Reynolds-number premixed turbulent flames, Combust. Flame 145 (2006), pp. 495–511. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Lindstedt, H. Ozarovsky, R.S. Barlow, and A.N. Karpetis, Progression of localized extinction in high Reynolds number turbulent jet flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007), pp. 1551–1558. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Gkagkas and R.P. Lindstedt, The impact of reduced chemistry on auto-ignition of H in turbulent flows, Combust. Theory Model. 13 (2009), pp. 607–643. doi: 10.1080/13647830902928524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.B.O. Waldheim, Modelling of soot formation and aromatic growth in laminar flames and reactor systems, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• J.E. de Vries, Study on turbulent fluctuations in diffusion flames using laser induced fluorescence, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• R.W. Bilger, S.H. Stårner, and R.J. Kee, On reduced mechanisms for methane–air combustion in nonpremixed flames, Combust. Flame 80 (1990), pp. 135–149. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(90)90122-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kazakov, H. Wang, and M. Frenklach, Detailed modeling of soot formation in laminar premixed ethylene flames at a pressure of 10 bar, Combust. Flame 100 (1995), pp. 111–120. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)00086-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar