Adjoint-based sensitivity and ignition threshold mapping in a turbulent mixing layer

References

• Frendi A. and Sibulkin M., Dependence of minimum ignition energy on ignition parameters, Combust. Sci. Technol. 73 (1990), pp. 395–413. doi: 10.1080/00102209008951659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond J.P., Diskin G.S. and Cutler A.D., Fuel-air mixing and combustion in scramjets, in 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Phuoc T.X., Laser-induced spark ignition fundamental and applications, Opt. Lasers. Eng. 44 (2006), pp. 351–397. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S.F. and Mastorakos E., Spark ignition of lifted turbulent jet flames, Combust. Flame. 146 (2006), pp. 215–231. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S.F., Balachandran R. and Mastorakos E., Measurements of ignition probability in turbulent non-premixed counterflow flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007), pp. 1507–1513. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastorakos E., Ignition of turbulent non-premixed flames, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 35 (2009), pp. 57–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssartier A., Cuenot B., Gicquel L. and Poinsot T., Using LES to predict ignition sequences and ignition probability of turbulent two-phase flames, Combust. Flame. 160 (2013), pp. 1191–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schefer R.W., Evans G.H., Zhang J., Ruggles A.J. and Greif R., Ignitability limits for combustion of unintended hydrogen releases: Experimental and theoretical results, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (2011), pp. 2426–2435. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bane S., Ziegler J., Boettcher P., Coronel S. and Shepherd J., Experimental investigation of spark ignition energy in kerosene, hexane, and hydrogen, J. Loss. Prev. Process. Ind. 26 (2013), pp. 290–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch A., Brown D., Dodson M. and Thomas J., Studies of flammability in turbulent flows using laser Raman spectroscopy, in Symposium (International) on Combustion, Elsevier, 17 (1979), pp. 307–314.
   Google Scholar
• Alvani R. and Fairweather M., Ignition characteristics of turbulent jet flows, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 80 (2002), pp. 917–923. doi: 10.1205/026387602321143471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daou J. and Daou R., Flame balls in mixing layers, Combust. Flame. 161 (2014), pp. 2015–2024. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacaze G., Richardson E. and Poinsot T., Large eddy simulation of spark ignition in a turbulent methane jet, Combust. Flame. 156 (2009), pp. 1993–2009. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacaze G., Cuenot B., Poinsot T. and Oschwald M., Large eddy simulation of laser ignition and compressible reacting flow in a rocket-like configuration, Combust. Flame. 156 (2009), pp. 1166–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian V., Domingo P. and Vervisch L., Large eddy simulation of forced ignition of an annular bluff-body burner, Combust. Flame. 157 (2010), pp. 579–601. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones W.P. and Prasad V.N., LES-PDF simulation of a spark ignited turbulent methane jet, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 1355–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewley T.R., Moin P. and Temam R., DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms, J. Fluid. Mech. 447 (2001), pp. 179–225. doi: 10.1017/S0022112001005821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei M. and Freund J.B., A noise-controlled free shear flow, J. Fluid. Mech. 546 (2006), pp. 123–152. doi: 10.1017/S0022112005007093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins J.R., Alonso J.J. and Reuther J.J., High-fidelity aerostructural design optimization of a supersonic business jet, J. Aircr. 41 (2004), pp. 523–530. doi: 10.2514/1.11478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson A. and Martinelli L., 2000 Aerodynamic shape optimization techniques based on control theory. In Computational Mathematics Driven by Industrial Problems (pp. 151–221). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Becker R. and Rannacher R., A feed-back approach to error control in finite element methods: Basic analysis and examples, Citeseer, University Park, PA, 1996, pp. 237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Fidkowski K.J. and Darmofal D.L., Review of output-based error estimation and mesh adaptation in computational fluid dynamics, AIAA J. 49 (2011), pp. 673–694. doi: 10.2514/1.J050073
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q., Forward and adjoint sensitivity computation of chaotic dynamical systems, J. Comput. Phys. 235 (2013), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D., Adjoint systems and their role in the receptivity problem for boundary layers, J. Fluid. Mech. 292 (1995), pp. 183–204. doi: 10.1017/S0022112095001480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchini P. and Bottaro A., Adjoint equations in stability analysis, Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 46 (2014), pp. 493. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadri U.A., Global stability and control of swirling jets and flames, Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Braman K., Oliver T.A. and Raman V., Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of flames. Combust. Theor. Model. 1 (2014), pp. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke M., Reiss J. and Sesterhenn J., Adjoint based optimisation of reactive compressible flows, Combust. Flame. 161 (2014), pp. 2552–2564. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadri U., Schmid P., Magri L. and Ihme M., Optimal ignition placement using nonlinear adjoint looping, in 69th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics, Portland, OR, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Magri L. and Juniper M.P., Adjoint-based linear analysis in reduced-order thermo-acoustic models, Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn. 6 (2014), pp. 225–246. doi: 10.1260/1756-8277.6.3.225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orchini A. and Juniper M.P., Linear stability and adjoint sensitivity analysis of thermoacoustic networks with premixed flames, Combust. Flame. 165 (2016), pp. 97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigas G., Jamieson N.P., Li L.K.B. and Juniper M.P., Experimental sensitivity analysis and control of thermoacoustic systems. J. Fluid. Mech. 787 (2016), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah S.K. and Jameson A., A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automati aerodynamic optimization, in Proceedings of the 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Reno, NV, Paper, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lea D.J., Allen M.R. and Haine T.W.N., Sensitivity analysis of the climate of a chaotic system, Tellus A 52 (2000), pp. 523–532. doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v52i5.12283
   Google Scholar
• Carnarius F.T., Ozkaya E. and Gauger N.R. Adjoint approaches for optimal flow control, in 5th Flow Control Conference, Chicago, IL, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Vishnampet R., Bodony D.J. and Freund J.B., A practical discrete-adjoint method for high-fidelity compressible turbulence simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 285 (2015), pp. 173–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capecelatro J., Vishnampet R., Bodony D.J. and Freund J.B., Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of localized ignition in a non-premixed hydrogen–air mixing layer, in 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2016, p. 2153.
   Google Scholar
• Capecelatro J., Bodony D.J. and Freund J.B., Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of ignition in a turbulent reactive shear layer, in 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, 2017, p. 0846.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi R., Effect of specific heat ratio on heat release analysis in a spark ignition engine, Sci. Iranica 18 (2011), pp. 1231–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams F.A., Theory of combustion in laminar flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 3 (1971), pp. 171–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.03.010171.001131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot T. and Veynante D., Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, Edwards, Philadelphia, PA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ballal D.R. and Lefebvre A., Spark ignition of turbulent flowing gases, in Proceedings of the 15th Aerospace Sciences Meeting Paper, AIAA Los Angeles, CA, 1977, pp. 77–185.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty N. and Mastorakos E., Numerical investigation of edge flame propagation characteristics in turbulent mixing layers, Phys. Fluids 18 (2006), pp. 105103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty N. and Mastorakos E., Direct numerical simulations of localised forced ignition in turbulent mixing layers: the effects of mixture fraction and its gradient, Flow Turbul. Combust. 80 (2008), pp. 155–186. doi: 10.1007/s10494-007-9110-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand B., Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx, J. Comput. Phys. 110 (1994), pp. 47–67. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson K., Svärd M. and Nordström J., Stable and accurate artificial dissipation, J. Sci. Comput. 21 (2004), pp. 57–79. doi: 10.1023/B:JOMP.0000027955.75872.3f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnampet Ganapathi Subramanian R., An exact and consistent adjoint method for high-fidelity discretization of the compressible flow equations, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter M., Gottlieb D. and Abarbenel S., Time-stable boundary conditions for finite difference schemes involving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application for high-order compact schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 111 (1994), pp. 220–236. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordström J. and Svärd M., Well-posed boundary conditions for the navier–stokes equations, SIAM. J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2005), pp. 1231–1255. doi: 10.1137/040604972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svärd M., Carpenter M.H. and Nordström J., A stable high-order finite difference scheme for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations, far-field boundary conditions, J. Comput. Phys. 225 (2007), pp. 1020–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodony D.J., Accuracy of the simultaneous-approximation-term boundary condition for time-dependent problems, J. Sci. Comput. 43 (2010), pp. 118–133. doi: 10.1007/s10915-010-9347-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund J.B., Proposed inflow/outflow boundary condition for direct computation of aerodynamic sound, AIAA J. 35 (1997), pp. 740. doi: 10.2514/2.167
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q. and Gao J., The drag-adjoint field of a circular cylinder wake at Reynolds numbers 20, 100 and 500, J. Fluid. Mech. 730 (2013), pp. 145–161. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2013.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q., Hu R. and Blonigan P., Least squares shadowing sensitivity analysis of chaotic limit cycle oscillations, J. Comput. Phys. 267 (2014), pp. 210–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonigan P.J., Wang Q., Nielsen E.J. and Diskin B., Least-squares shadowing sensitivity analysis of chaotic flow around a two-dimensional airfoil. AIAA J. 56 (2017), pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Blonigan P.J., Fernandez P., Murman S.M., Wang Q., Rigas G. and Magri L., Toward a chaotic adjoint for LES (2017). Available at arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.06809.
   Google Scholar
• Griewank A. and Corliss G.F., Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: Theory, Implementation, and Application, in SIAM Proc. Ser., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G.L. and Roshko A., On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers, J. Fluid. Mech. 64 (1974), pp. 775–816. doi: 10.1017/S002211207400190X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantano C., Sarkar S. and Williams F.A., Mixing of a conserved scalar in a turbulent reacting shear layer, J. Fluid. Mech. 481 (2003), pp. 291–328. doi: 10.1017/S0022112003003872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantano C. and Sarkar S., A study of compressibility effects in the high-speed turbulent shear layer using direct simulation, J. Fluid. Mech. 451 (2002), pp. 329–371. doi: 10.1017/S0022112001006978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins J.R., Sturdza P. and Alonso J.J., The complex-step derivative approximation, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. (TOMS) 29 (2003), pp. 245–262. doi: 10.1145/838250.838251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters N., Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dold J.W., Flame propagation in a nonuniform mixture: analysis of a slowly varying triple flame, Combust. Flame. 76 (1989), pp. 71–88. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(89)90079-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley L.J. and Dold J.W., Flame propagation in a nonuniform mixture: analysis of a propagating triple-flame, Combust. Sci. Technol. 80 (1991), pp. 23–46. doi: 10.1080/00102209108951775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckmaster J., Edge-flames, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 28 (2002), pp. 435–475. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1285(02)00008-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantano C., Direct simulation of non-premixed flame extinction in a methane–air jet with reduced chemistry, J. Fluid. Mech. 514 (2004), pp. 231–270. doi: 10.1017/S0022112004000266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitsch H., Cha C.M. and Fedotov S., Flamelet modelling of non-premixed turbulent combustion with local extinction and re-ignition, Combust. Theor. Model. 7 (2003), pp. 317–332. doi: 10.1088/1364-7830/7/2/306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman R. and Freund J.B., The sound from mixing layers simulated with different ranges of turbulence scales, Phys. Fluids 20 (2008), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1063/1.3005823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui C., A numerical investigation of shock-associated noise, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J., Bodony D.J. and Freund J.B., Adjoint-based control of loud events in a turbulent jet, J. Fluid. Mech. 741 (2014), pp. 28–59. Available at http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S002211201300654X. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2013.654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles M.B. and Pierce N.A., An introduction to the adjoint approach to design, Flow Turbul. Combust. 65 (2000), pp. 393–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1011430410075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foures D., Caulfield C. and Schmid P., Optimal mixing in two-dimensional plane poiseuille flow at finite péclet number, J. Fluid. Mech. 748 (2014), pp. 241–277. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2014.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar