Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of quantities of interest of complex combustion models

References

• I. Borger, A. Merkel, J. Lachmann, H.J. Spangenberg, and T. Turányi, An extended kinetic model and its reduction by sensitivity analysis for the methanol/oxygen gas-phase thermolysis, Acta Chim. Hung. 129 (1992), pp. 855–864.
   Google Scholar
• T. Turányi, Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems: Tools and applications, J. Math. Chem. 5 (1990), pp. 203–248. doi: 10.1007/BF01166355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Demiralp and H. Rabitz, Chemical kinetic functional sensitivity analysis: Derived sensitivities and general applications, J. Chem. Phys. 75 (1981), pp. 1810–1819. doi: 10.1063/1.442260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Rabitz, M. Kramer, and D. Dacol, Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34 (1983), pp. 419–461. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pc.34.100183.002223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.S. Tomlin, The role of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in combustion modelling, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 159–176. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Turányi and A.S. Tomlin, Analysis of Kinetic Reaction Mechanisms, Springer, Berlin, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• H.J. Curran, P. Gaffuri, W.J. Pitz, and C.K. Westbrook, A comprehensive modeling study of n-heptane oxidation, Combust. Flame. 114 (1998), pp. 149–177. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00282-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Cai, A. Sudholt, D. Lee, F. Egolfopoulos, H. Pitsch, C. Westbrook, and S. Sarathy, Chemical kinetic study of a novel lignocellulosic biofuel: Di-n-butyl ether oxidation in a laminar flow reactor and flames, Combust. Flame. 161 (2014), pp. 798–809. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Seiser, H. Pitsch, K. Seshadri, W. Pitz, and H. Gurran, Extinction and autoignition of n-heptane in counterflow configuration, Proc. Combust. Inst. 28 (2000), pp. 2029–2037. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80610-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.G. Davis, A.B. Mhadeshwar, D.G. Vlachos, and H. Wang, A new approach to response surface development for detailed gas-phase and surface reaction kinetic model optimization, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 36 (2004), pp. 94–106. doi: 10.1002/kin.10177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.J. Hughes, J.F. Griffiths, M. Fairweather, and A.S. Tomlin, Evaluation of models for the low temperature combustion of alkanes through interpretation of pressure-temperature ignition diagrams, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8 (2006), pp. 3197–3210. doi: 10.1039/B605379C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Cai, Y. Uygun, C. Togbé, H. Pitsch, H. Olivier, P. Dagaut, and S. Sarathy, An experimental and modeling study of n-octanol combustion, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 419–427. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Peters, G. Paczko, R. Seiser, and K. Seshadri, Temperature cross-over and non-thermal runaway at two-stage ignition of n-heptane, Combust. Flame. 128 (2002), pp. 38–59. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00331-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Dunker, The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics, J. Chem. Phys. 81 (1984), pp. 2385–2393. doi: 10.1063/1.447938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Dunker, G. Yarwood, J.P. Ortmann, and G.M. Wilson, The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model implementation, accuracy, and efficiency, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002), pp. 2965–2976. doi: 10.1021/es0112691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hwang, E.P. Dougherty, S. Rabitz, and H. Rabitz, The Green's function method of sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics, J. Chem. Phys. 69 (1978), pp. 5180–5191. doi: 10.1063/1.436465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.P. Dougherty and H. Rabitz, A computational algorithm for the Green's function method of sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 11 (1979), pp. 1237–1248. Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/kin.550111203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.P. Dougherty, J. Hwang, and H. Rabitz, Further developments and applications of the Green's function method of sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics, J. Chem. Phys. 71 (1979), pp. 1794–1808. doi: 10.1063/1.438530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kramer, J. Calo, and H. Rabitz, An improved computational method for sensitivity analysis: Green's function method with AIM, Appl. Math. Model. 5 (1981), pp. 432–441. doi: 10.1016/S0307-904X(81)80027-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Giles and N. Pierce, An introduction to the adjoint approach to design, Flow, Turbul Combust. 65 (2000), pp. 393–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1011430410075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lemke, J. Reiss, and J. Sesterhenn, Adjoint based optimisation of reactive compressible flows, Combust. Flame. 161 (2014), pp. 2552–2564. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Duraisamy and J.J. Alonso, Adjoint based techniques for uncertainty quantification in turbulent flows with combustion, 42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Wang, K. Duraisamy, J.J. Alonso, and G. Iaccarino, Risk assessment of scramjet unstart using adjoint-based sampling methods, AIAA J. 50 (2012), pp. 581–592. doi: 10.2514/1.J051264
   Google Scholar
• J. Gray, M. Lemke, J. Reiss, C. Paschereit, J. Sesterhenn, and J. Moeck, A compact shock-focusing geometry for detonation initiation: Experiments and adjoint-based variational data assimilation, Combust. Flame. 183 (2017), pp. 144–156. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Braman, T.A. Oliver, and V. Raman, Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis of flames, Combust. Theory Model. 19 (2015), pp. 29–56. doi: 10.1080/13647830.2014.976274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sandu, D.N. Daescu, and G.R. Carmichael, Direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of chemical kinetic systems with KPP: Part I-theory and software tools, Atmos. Environ. 37 (2003), pp. 5083–5096. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.N. Daescu, A. Sandu, and G.R. Carmichael, Direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of chemical kinetic systems with KPP: II-numerical validation and applications, Atmos. Environ. 37 (2003), pp. 5097–5114. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.J. McBride, S. Gordon, and M.A. Reno, Coefficients for calculating thermodynamic and transport properties of individual species, Tech. Rep., NASA Lewis Research Center, Heidelberg Coll., Tiffin, OH, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• M. ÓConaire, H.J. Curran, J.M. Simmie, W.J. Pitz, and C.K. Westbrook, A comprehensive modeling study of hydrogen oxidation, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 36 (2004), pp. 603–622. doi: 10.1002/kin.20036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.P. Smith, 2017. Available at http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/ (last seen 2017).
   Google Scholar
• D.G. Goodwin, H.K. Moffat, and R.L. Speth, Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes (2017). Available at http://www.cantera.org.
   Google Scholar
• H. Pitsch, FlameMaster: A C++ computer program for 0D combustion and 1D laminar flame computations.
   Google Scholar
• M. Lemke, A. Midlar, J. Reiss, V. Mehrmann, and J. Sesterhenn, Model reduction of reactive processes, in Active Flow and Combustion Control 2014, R. King, ed., Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Vol. 127, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015, pp. 397–413.
   Google Scholar
• A. Jameson, Aerodynamic design via control theory, J. Sci. Comput. 3 (1988), pp. 233–260. doi: 10.1007/BF01061285
   Google Scholar
• M. Lemke, Adjoint based data assimilation in compressible flows with application to pressure determination from PIV data, Ph. D. thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, 2015.
   Google Scholar