A new preferential diffusion model applied to FGM simulations of hydrogen flames

References

• Y. Zhang, O. Mathieu, E.L. Petersen, G. Bourque and H.J. Curran, Assessing the predictions of a NOx kinetic mechanism on recent hydrogen and syngas experimental data, Combust. Flame 182 (2017), pp. 122–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Konnov, Yet another kinetic mechanism for hydrogen combustion, Combust. Flame 203 (2019), pp. 14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Hong, D.F. Davidson and R.K. Hanson, An improved H2/O2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements, Combust. Flame 158 (2011), pp. 633–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.L. Sánchez and F.A. Williams, Recent advances in understanding of flammability characteristics of hydrogen, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 41 (2014), pp. 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Konnov, A. Mohammad, V. Kishore, N. Kim, C. Prathap and S. Kumar, A comprehensive review of measurements and data analysis of laminar burning velocities for various fuel+air mixtures, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 68 (2018), pp. 197–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. van Oijen and L.P.H. de Goey, Modelling of Premixed Laminar Flames using Flamelet-Generated Manifolds, Combust. Sci. Technol. 161 (2000), pp. 113–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200008935814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. van Oijen and L.P.H. de Goey, Modelling of premixed counterflow flames using the flamelet-generated manifold method, Combust. Theor. Model. 6 (2002), pp. 463–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1364-7830/6/3/305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. van Oijen, A. Donini, R.J.M. Bastiaans, J.H.M. ten Thije Boonkkamp and L.P.H. de Goey, State-of-the-art in premixed combustion modeling using flamelet generated manifolds, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 57 (2016), pp. 30–74. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360128515300137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Poinsot and D. Veynante, Theoretical and numerical combustion, R. T. Edwards, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• F.A. Williams, Combustion theory, Perseus books, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• S. Chapman and T.G. Cowling, The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases, Cambridge University Press, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Mizobuchi, T. Nambu and T. Takeno, Numerical study of tip opening of hydrogen/air Bunsen flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 1775–1781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Shoshin, A. Sepman, L. de Goey, A. Mokhov and H. Levinsky, Experimental study of the structure of the lean two-dimensional hydrogen-methane-air Bunsen flame tip with implications to turbulent flames, Proc. European Combust. Meeting (2015).
   Google Scholar
• J.A.M. de Swart, R.J.M. Bastiaans, J.A. van Oijen, L.P.H. de Goey and R.S. Cant, Inclusion of Preferential Diffusion in Simulations of Premixed Combustion of Hydrogen/Methane Mixtures with Flamelet Generated Manifolds, Flow Turbul. Combust. 85 (2010), pp. 473–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Donini, R.J.M. Bastiaans, J.A. van Oijen and L.P.H. de Goey, Differential diffusion effects inclusion with flamelet generated manifold for the modeling of stratified premixed cooled flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 831–837. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540748914002089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Regele, E. Knudsen, H. Pitsch and G. Blanquart, A two-equation model for non-unity Lewis number differential diffusion in lean premixed laminar flames, Combust. Flame 160 (2013), pp. 240–250. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010218012002921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Schlup and G. Blanquart, Reproducing curvature effects due to differential diffusion in tabulated chemistry for premixed flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 2511–2518. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540748918303973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.W. Bilger, S.H. Stårner and R.J. Kee, On reduced mechanisms for methane-air combustion in nonpremixed flames, Combust. Flame 80 (1990), pp. 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. van Oijen, F.A. Lammers and L.P.H. de Goey, Modeling of complex premixed burner systems by using flamelet-generated manifolds, Combust. Flame 127 (2001), pp. 2124–2134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Niu, L. Vervisch and P.D. Tao, An optimization-based approach to detailed chemistry tabulation: Automated progress variable definition, Combust. Flame 160 (2013), pp. 776–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.W. Bilger, The structure of turbulent nonpremixed flame, Symposium (International) on Combust. 22 (1989), pp. 475–488. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0082078489800542.
   Google Scholar
• N. Peters, Turbulent combustion, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2000. Available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/turbulent-combustion/4A93A00CCA922A28D8E5316744D8CF8F.
   Google Scholar
• S. Chapman, T. Cowling, D. Burnett and C. Cercignani, The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases: an account of the kinetic theory of viscosity, thermal conduction and diffusion in gases, Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• M.D. Smooke and V. Giovangigli, Premixed and nonpremixed test problem results, in Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames: A Topical Volume, M.D. Smooke, ed., Berlin: Springer, 1991, pp. 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ihme and H. Pitsch, Modelling of radiation and nitric oxide formation in turbulent non-premixed flames using a flamelet/progress variable formulation, Phys. Fluids 20 (2008), pp. 055110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.V. Efimov, P. de Goey and J.A. van Oijen, FGM with REDx: chemically reactive dimensionality extension, Combust. Theor. Model. 22 (2018), pp. 1103–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar