A simplified two-mixture-fraction-based flamelet modelling and its validation on a non-premixed staged combustion system

References

• O. Kurata, N. Iki, T. Matsunuma, T. Inoue, T. Tsujimura, H. Furutani, H. Kobayashi, and A. Hayakawa, Performances and emission characteristics of NH3–air and NH3CH4–air combustion gas-turbine power generations, Proc. Combustion Inst. 36 (2017), pp. 3351–3359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.C. Okafor, K.K.A. Somarathne, A. Hayakawa, T. Kudo, O. Kurata, N. Iki, and H. Kobayashi, Towards the development of an efficient low-NOx ammonia combustor for a micro gas turbine, Proc. Combustion Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 4597–4606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kobayashi, A. Hayakawa, K.K.A. Somarathne, and E.C. Okafor, Science and technology of ammonia combustion, Proc. Combustion Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 109–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Peters, Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 10 (1984), pp. 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Peters, Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• C.D. Pierce and P. Moin, Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion, J. Fluid. Mech. 504 (2004), pp. 73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Pitsch, Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38 (2006), pp. 453–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Hasse and N. Peters, A two mixture fraction flamelet model applied to split injections in a DI diesel engine, Proc. Combustion Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 2755–2762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Barths, H. Pitsch, and N. Peters, 3D simulation of DI diesel combustion and pollutant formation using a two-component reference fuel, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 54 (1999), pp. 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• C. Felsch, M. Gauding, C. Hasse, S. Vogel, and N. Peters, An extended flamelet model for multiple injections in DI diesel engines, Proc. Combustion Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 2775–2783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.M. Doran, H. Pitsch, and D.J. Cook, A priori testing of a two-dimensional unsteady flamelet model for three-feed combustion systems, Proc. Combustion Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1317–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ihme and Y.C. See, LES flamelet modeling of a three-stream MILD combustor: Analysis of flame sensitivity to scalar inflow conditions, Proc. Combustion Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 1309–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.B. Dally, A. Karpetis, and R. Barlow, Structure of turbulent non-premixed jet flames in a diluted hot coflow, Proc. Combustion Inst. 29 (2002), pp. 1147–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ihme, J. Zhang, G. He, and B. Dally, Large-eddy simulation of a jet-in-hot-coflow burner operating in the oxygen-diluted combustion regime, Flow, Turbulence Combust. 89 (2012), pp. 449–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Gomet, V. Robin, and A. Mura, A multiple-inlet mixture fraction model for nonpremixed combustion, Combust. Flame. 162 (2015), pp. 668–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Watanabe and K. Yamamoto, Flamelet model for pulverized coal combustion, Proc. Combustion Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 2315–2322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Rieth, F. Proch, M. Rabaçal, B. Franchetti, F.C. Marincola, and A. Kempf, Flamelet LES of a semi-industrial pulverized coal furnace, Combust. Flame. 173 (2016), pp. 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Watanabe, T. Okazaki, K. Yamamoto, K. Kuramashi, and A. Baba, Large-eddy simulation of pulverized coal combustion using flamelet model, Proc. Combustion Inst. 36 (2017), pp. 2155–2163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wen, K. Luo, H. Jin, and J. Fan, Large eddy simulation of piloted pulverised coal combustion using extended flamelet/progress variable model, Combustion Theory Model. 21 (2017), pp. 925–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wen, H. Wang, Y. Luo, K. Luo, and J. Fan, Evaluation of flamelet/progress variable model for laminar pulverized coal combustion, Phys. Fluids 29 (2017), p. 083607.
   Google Scholar
• X. Wen, Y. Luo, H. Wang, K. Luo, H. Jin, and J. Fan, A three mixture fraction flamelet model for multi-stream laminar pulverized coal combustion, Proc. Combustion Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 2901–2910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wen, M. Rieth, A. Scholtissek, O.T. Stein, H. Wang, K. Luo, A. Kronenburg, J. Fan, and C. Hasse, A comprehensive study of flamelet tabulation methods for pulverized coal combustion in a turbulent mixing layer–part II: Strong heat losses and multi-mode combustion, Combust. Flame. 216 (2020), pp. 439–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.A. Perry, M.E. Mueller, and A.R. Masri, A two mixture fraction flamelet model for large eddy simulation of turbulent flames with inhomogeneous inlets, Proc. Combustion Inst. 36 (2017), pp. 1767–1775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.A. Perry and M.E. Mueller, Effect of multiscalar subfilter PDF models in LES of turbulent flames with inhomogeneous inlets, Proc. Combustion Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 2287–2295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Mueller, A computationally efficient turnkey approach to turbulent combustion modeling: From elusive fantasy to impending reality, in AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. California. 2019, p. 0994.
   Google Scholar
• P. Yu, H. Watanabe, W. Zhang, R. Kurose, and T. Kitagawa, Flamelet model for a three-feed non-premixed combustion system with a diluent stream: Analysis and validation of quasi-two-dimensional flamelet (Q2DF) models, Energy Fuels 33 (2019), pp. 4640–4650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Yu, H. Watanabe, H. Pitsch, I. Yuri, H. Nishida, and T. Kitagawa, Analysis of a quasi-two-dimensional flamelet model on a three-feed non-premixed oxy-combustion burner, Flow, Turbulence Combustion 108 (2021), pp. 303–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ihme and H. Pitsch, Modeling of radiation and nitric oxide formation in turbulent nonpremixed flames using a flamelet/progress variable formulation, Phys. Fluids 20 (2008), p. 055110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E. Mueller and H. Pitsch, Large eddy simulation of soot evolution in an aircraft combustor, Phys. Fluids 25 (2013), p. 110812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.M. Doran, A Multi-Dimensional Flamelet Model for Ignition in Multi-Feed Combustion Systems, Stanford University, California, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M.E. Mueller, Physically-derived reduced-order manifold-based modeling for multi-modal turbulent combustion, Combust. Flame. 214 (2020), pp. 287–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Novoselov, B.A. Perry, and M.E. Mueller, Two-dimensional manifold equations for multi-modal turbulent combustion: Nonpremixed combustion limit and scalar dissipation rates, Combust. Flame. 231 (2021), p. 111475.
   Google Scholar
• J. Floyd, A.M. Kempf, A. Kronenburg 1, and R. Ram, A simple model for the filtered density function for passive scalar combustion les, Combustion Theory Modell. 13 (2009), pp. 559–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Weise, D. Messig, B. Meyer, and C. Hasse, An abstraction layer for efficient memory management of tabulated chemistry and flamelet solutions, Combustion Theory Modell. 17 (2013), pp. 411–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bode, N. Collier, F. Bisetti, and H. Pitsch, Adaptive chemistry lookup tables for combustion simulations using optimal b-spline interpolants, Combustion Theory Modell. 23 (2019), pp. 674–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ding, T. Readshaw, S. Rigopoulos, and W. Jones, Machine learning tabulation of thermochemistry in turbulent combustion: An approach based on hybrid flamelet/random data and multiple multilayer perceptrons, Combust. Flame. 231 (2021), p. 111493.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ihme, W.T. Chung, and A.A. Mishra, Combustion machine learning: Principles, progress and prospects, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 91 (2022), p. 101010.
   Google Scholar
• A.J. Fillo, P.E. Hamlington, and K.E. Niemeyer, Assessing diffusion model impacts on enstrophy and flame structure in turbulent lean premixed flames, Combustion Theory Modell. 26 (2022), pp. 712–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Baba and R. Kurose, Analysis and flamelet modelling for spray combustion, J. Fluid. Mech. 612 (2008), pp. 45–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Fujita, H. Watanabe, R. Kurose, and S. Komori, Two-dimensional direct numerical simulation of spray flames-part 1: Effects of equivalence ratio, fuel droplet size and radiation, and validity of flamelet model, Fuel 104 (2013), pp. 515–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kitano, T. Nakatani, R. Kurose, and S. Komori, Two-dimensional direct numerical simulation of spray flames–part 2: Effects of ambient pressure and lift, and validity of flamelet model, Fuel 104 (2013), pp. 526–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.A. Williams, Combustion Theory, CRC Press, Florida, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• J.F. MacArt and M.E. Mueller, Semi-implicit iterative methods for low mach number turbulent reacting flows: Operator splitting versus approximate factorization, J. Comput. Phys. 326 (2016), pp. 569–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. MacArt, T. Grenga, and M.E. Mueller, Effects of combustion heat release on velocity and scalar statistics in turbulent premixed jet flames at low and high karlovitz numbers, Combust. Flame. 191 (2018), pp. 468–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.S. Jiang and C.W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1996), pp. 202–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Desjardins, G. Blanquart, G. Balarac, and H. Pitsch, High order conservative finite difference scheme for variable density low mach number turbulent flows, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008), pp. 7125–7159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Pitsch and H. Steiner, Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent piloted methane/air diffusion flame (sandia flame D), Phys. Fluids 12 (2000), pp. 2541–2554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Danaila and B. Boersma, Mode interaction in a forced homogeneous jet at low Reynolds numbers, in Proceedings of the Summer Program. California. 1998, pp. 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• S.G. Davis, A.V. Joshi, H. Wang, and F. Egolfopoulos, An optimized kinetic model of H2/CO combustion, Proc. Combustion Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 1283–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Pitsch, A C++ Computer Program for 0-D Combustion and 1-D Laminar Flame Calculation, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• F. Proch and A. Kempf, Modeling heat loss effects in the large eddy simulation of a model gas turbine combustor with premixed flamelet generated manifolds, Proc. Combustion Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 3337–3345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.C. Ma, H. Wu, M. Ihme, and J.P. Hickey, Nonadiabatic flamelet formulation for predicting wall heat transfer in rocket engines, AIAA J. 56 (2018), pp. 2336–2349.
   Google Scholar