Impact of aquaculture feed technology on fish income and poverty in Kenya

References

• Amankwah, A., Quagrainie, K. K., & Preckel, V. P. (2016). Demand for improved fish feed in the presence of a subsidy: A double-hurdle application in Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 47(6), 633–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amare, M., Asfaw, S., & Shiferaw, B. (2012). Welfare impacts of maize–pigeon pea intensification in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics, 43(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D. (2001). Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19(1), 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerril, J., & Abdulai, A. (2010). The impact of improved maize varieties on poverty in Mexico: A propensity score-matching approach. World Development, 38(7), 1024–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Survey, 22, 31–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2002). World poverty and the role of agricultural technology: Direct & indirect effects. The Journal of Development Studies, 38(4), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2006). Progress in the modeling of rural households’ behavior under market failures. In A. de Janvry, & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Poverty, inequality and development (pp. 155–181). US: Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A., & Gangl, M. (2004). Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34, 271–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, C. R., & Neira, I. (2005). Tilapia farm business management and economics: A training manual. Pine Bluff: University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitonga, Z. M., De Groote, H., Kassie, M., & Tefera, T. (2013). Impact of metal silos on households’ maize storage, storage losses and food security: An application of a propensity score matching. Food Policy, 43, 44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Kenya. (2009). Economic stimulus program: Overcoming today’s challenges for a better Kenya tomorrow. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of the Republic of Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2015). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanja, D. D., Renkow, M., & Crawford, E. W. (2003). Welfare effects of maize technologies in marginal and high potential regions of Kenya. Agricultural Economic, 29(3), 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassam, L. (2013). Assessing the contribution of aquaculture to poverty reduction in Ghana (PhD thesis). University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., & Muricho, G. (2011). Agricultural technology, crop income, and poverty alleviation in Uganda. World Development, 39(10), 1784–1795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Basic report on well-being in Kenya: Based on Kenya integrated household budget survey, 2005/06. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS).
   Google Scholar
• Mendola, M. (2007). Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: A propensity-score matching analysis for rural Bangladesh. Food Policy, 32(3), 372–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguezet, P. M. D., Diagne, A., Okoruwa, V. O., & Ojehomon, V. (2011). Impact of improved rice technology (Nerica varieties) on income and poverty among rice farming households in Nigeria: A local average treatment effect (LATE) approach. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 50, 267–291.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, K. A. T., Jolly, C. M., Bui, C. N. P. T., & Le, T. T. H. (2016). Aquaculture and poverty alleviation in Ben Tre Province, Vietnam. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 20(1), 82–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Sensitivity analysis in observational studies. In Brian S. Everitt & David C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 4, pp. 1809–1814). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoulet, E., & de Janvry, A. (1995). Quantitative development policy analysis (1st ed.). Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smale, M., Just, R. E., & Leathers, H. D. (1994). Land allocation in HYV adoption models: An investigation of alternative explanations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 76(3), 535–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. R., & Irz, X. (2009). Is aquaculture development an effective tool for poverty alleviation? A review of theory and evidence. Cahiers Agricultures, 18(2–3), 292–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toufique, K. A., & Belton, B. (2014). Is aquaculture pro-poor? Empirical evidence of impacts on fish consumption in Bangladesh. World Development, 64, 609–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar