The effect of sustainability labels on farmed-shrimp preferences: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Vietnam

References

• Aquaculture Stewardship Council. (2019). ASC shrimp standard version 1.1. Aquaculture Stewardship Council.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, S. K., & Cole, C. (2002). Consumers’ search and use of nutrition information: The challenge and promise of the nutrition labelling and education act. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.3.112.18502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergleiter, S., & Meisch, S. (2015). Certification standards for aquaculture products: Bringing together the values of producers and consumers in globalised organic food markets. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(3), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9531-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borin, N., Cerf, D. C., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761111101976
   Google Scholar
• Bronnmann, J., & Asche, F. (2017). Sustainable seafood from aquaculture and wild fisheries: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Ecological Economics, 142, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillo, J., Martín, J. C., & Román, C. (2020). Discrete choice experiments in the analysis of consumers’ preferences for finfish products: A systematic literature review. Food Quality and Preference, 84(March), 103952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103952
   Google Scholar
• Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., & Nardone, G. (2015). Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. In Appetite (Vol. 84, pp. 212–227). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Alfnes, F., & Rickertsen, K. (2015). Consumer preferences, ecolabels, and effects of negative environmental information. AgBioForum, 18(3), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.168094
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-F. (2009). Attitude toward organic foods among Taiwanese as related to health consciousness, environmental attitudes, and the mediating effects of a healthy lifestyle. British Food Journal, 111(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910931986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, T. T. K., Clausen, J. H., Van, P. T., Tersbøl, B., & Dalsgaard, A. (2017). Use practices of antimicrobials and other compounds by shrimp and fish farmers in Northern Vietnam. Aquaculture Reports, 7(January), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2017.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Danso, G., Otoo, M., Linh, N., & Madurangi, G. (2017). Households’ willingness-to-pay for fish product attributes and implications for market feasibility of wastewater-based aquaculture businesses in Hanoi, Vietnam. Resources, 6(3), 30–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6030030
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, M., Bich, T. T., Mo, C., & Thanh, D. V. (2016). The challenge of adverse selection to domestic seafood markets in Vietnam: Assessing consumer demand and supply-side policy options (p. 2340). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Faltmann, N. K. (2019). Between food safety concerns and responsibilisation: Organic food consumption in Ho Chi Minh City. In J. Ehlert & N. K. Faltmann (Eds.), Food anxiety in globalising Vietnam (1st ed., p. 320). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2019a). Fishery and aquaculture country profiles: The Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2019b). GLOBEFISH highlights a quaterly update on world seafood markets (January 2019 ISSUE, with Jan–Sep. 2018 Statistics; About Globefish, Issue 1st January 2019 ISSUE). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2020). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, P. R., & Viswanathan, K. K. (2004). Ecolabelling and fisheries management (Report No. WorldFish Center Contribution No. 1714). WorldFish Center.
   Google Scholar
• GlobalG.A.P. (2018). Localg.a.p (p. 37). GlobalG.A.P A.P.c/o FoodFLUS GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy. 44(2014), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(94)00034-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Viney, R., Haas, M., & Louviere, J. (2004). Using stated preference discrete choice modeling to evaluate health care programs. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 1026–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00352-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., Mourato, S., & Wright, R. E. (2002). Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., & Greene, W. H. (2003). The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation, 30(2), 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis - a primer. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkes, C., & Schulze-Ehlers, B. (2018). Consumer attitudes and preferences towards Pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin. Appetite, 127(2018), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hole, A. R. (2007). Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0700700306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, A. R. (2016). MIXLOGITWTP: Stata module to estimate mixed logit models in WTP space [Computer software]. Statistical Software Components S458037, Boston College Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Hole, A. R., & Kolstad, J. R. (2012). Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: A comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment. Empirical Economics, 42(2), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0500-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L. (2003). Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness to pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 840–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehoe, C., Marschke, M., Uttamamunee, W., Kittitornkool, J., & Vandergeest, P. (2016). Developing local sustainable seafood markets: A Thai example. World Food Policy, 2–3(2–1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.18278/wfp.2.2.3.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. T., & Lee, M. K. (2018). Consumer preference for eco-labeled seafood in Korea. Sustainability, 10(9), 3276–3211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoleon, A., & Yabe, M. (2003). Assessing the impacts of alternative ‘opt-out’ formats in choice experiment studies : Consumer preferences for genetically modified content and production information in food. Journal of Agricultural Policy Research, 5(2003), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancsar, E., Fiebig, D. G., & Hole, A. R. (2017). Discrete choice experiments: A guide to model specification, estimation and software. PharmacoEconomics, 35(7), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, E., & Rouwendal, J. (2006). Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, P. W. (2020). The Vietnam consumer survey: An accelerating momentum. Deloitte Southeast Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008). The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naturland. (2018). Naturland standards on production (p. 50). Naturland.
   Google Scholar
• Ngoc, P. T. A., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Le, T. C., Bosma, R. H., Verreth, J., & Lansink, A. O. (2016). Adoption of recirculating aquaculture systems in large Pangasius farms: A choice experiment. Aquaculture, 460, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.03.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen-Viet, H., Tuyet-Hanh, T. T., Unger, F., Dang-Xuan, S., & Grace, D. (2017). Food safety in Vietnam: Where we are at and what we can learn from international experiences. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 6(1), 39–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-017-0249-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orme, B. K. (2010). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research (2nd ed.). Research Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, D. L., & Tschirley, D. L. (2017). Demand for food safety in emerging and developing countries. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 7(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/jadee-12-2014-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacifico, D., & Yoo, H. I. (2013). Lclogit: A Stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm. The Stata Journal, 13(3), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1301300312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phong, T. N., Thang, V. T., & Hoai, N. T. (2021). What motivates farmers to accept good aquaculture practices in development policy? Results from choice experiment surveys with small-scale shrimp farmers in Vietnam. Economic Analysis and Policy, 72(2021), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.09.015.
   Google Scholar
• Pongthanapanich, T., Nguyen, K. A. T., & Jolly, C. M. (2019). Risk management practices of small intensive shrimp farmers in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam: Vol. FAO Fisher (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. C1194; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. C1194). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Posri, W., Shankar, B., & Chadbunchachai, S. (2006). Consumer attitudes towards and willingness to pay for pesticide residue limit compliant “safe” vegetables in Northeast Thailand. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 19(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1300/J047v19n01_0.5.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J., Wilkings, A., Lynch, M., & MacFatridge, S. (2016). State of Sustainability Initiatives Review: Standards and the blue economy (R. Ilnyckyj & E. Rickert, eds.). International Institute for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Puckett, S. M., & Rose, J. M. (2010). Observed efficiency of a D-optimal design in an interactive agency choice experiment. In S. Hess & A. Daly (Eds.), Choice modelling: The state-of-the-art and the state-of-practice (pp. 163–193). Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Risius, A., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2017). Consumer preferences for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from in-depth interviews, think aloud protocols and choice experiments. Appetite, 113, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roitner-Schobesberger, B., Darnhofer, I., Somsook, S., & Vogl, C. R. (2008). Consumer perceptions of organic foods in Bangkok, Thailand. Food Policy. 33(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, R. D. O., Gorgulho, B. M., Castro, M. A. D., Fisberg, R. M., Marchioni, D. M., & Baltar, V. T. (2019). Principal component analysis and factor analysis: Differences and similarities in nutritional epidemiology application. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720190041.
   Google Scholar
• Soley, G., Hu, W., & Vassalos, M. (2019). Willingness to pay for shrimp with homegrown by heroes, community-supported fishery, best aquaculture practices, or local attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 51(04), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2019.19
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, G., Scarpa, R., & Cavicchi, A. (2012). Exploring consumer’s preferences for farmed sea bream. Aquaculture International, 20(4), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-011-9495-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis; Concepts and theory. Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics, 27(WSEAS), 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, L., Luo, X., Cheng, Y., Yang, F., & Ran, B. (2014). Constructing an optimal orthogonal choice design with alternative-specific attributes for stated choice experiments. Transportation Research Record, 2451(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.3141/2451-06
   Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. (2000). Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decisions: Model development and multinational validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23(3), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007122319675.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation (2nd eds.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K., & Weeks, M. (2005). Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space. In R. Scarpa & A. Alberini (Eds.), Applications (pp. 1–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, N., Bailey, C., Wilson, N., & Phillips, M. (2013). Governance of global value chains in response to food safety and certification standards: The case of shrimp from Vietnam. World Development, 45(202374), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.025.
   Google Scholar
• Tsantiris, K., Zheng, L., & Chomo, V. (2018). Seafood certification and developing countries: Focus on Asia (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1157). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. J., & Phillips, B. (2008). Seafood ecolabelling: Principles and practice (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Xuan, B. B. (2021). Consumer preference for eco-labelled aquaculture products in Vietnam. Aquaculture, 532(October 2020), 736111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736111
   Google Scholar
• Yi, S. (2019). Willingness-to-pay for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from Korean red seabream aquaculture. Sustainability, 11(6), 1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, C. (2017). A study of Chinese consumer preferences for sustainably farmed seafood [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Rhode Island.
   Google Scholar