Uncovering the statistical and spatial characteristics of fine toposcale DEM error

References

• Ackermann , F. 1979 . “ The accuracy of digital height models. ” . In Photogrammetric Week 1979 , 133 – 144 . Stuttgart : Institute for Photogrammetry, University of Stuttgart .
   Google Scholar
• Anon . 2003 . JHS 154: ETRS89‐järjestelmään liittyvät karttaprojektiot, tasokoordinaatistot ja karttalehtijako (Recommendations for the Public Administration JHS 154 ) , Helsinki : JUHTA, Finnish Geodetic Institute, and National Land Survey of Finland .
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson , P. M. 2002 . Surface modelling: What's the point? . Transactions in GIS , 6 : 1 – 4 .
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson , P. 1999 . Processing of laser scanner data—algorithms and applications. . ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 54 : 138 – 147 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson , P. 2000 . “ DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. ” . In International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33/B4‐1 , 110 – 117 . Amsterdam : GITC .
   Google Scholar
• Batschelet , E. 1981 . Circular Statistics in Biology , London : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bilker , M. and Kaartinen , H. 2001 . “ The quality of real‐time kinematic (RTK) GPS positioning. ” . In Reports of the Finnish Geodetic Institute 2001:1 , Kirkkonummi : Finnish Geodetic Institute .
   Google Scholar
• BKG (Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie). 2004. Digitales Geländemodell 1: 50 000 M745. Available online at: http://www.geodatenzentrum.de/docpdf/dgm50_m745.pdf (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Bonin , O. and Rousseaux , F. 2005 . Digital terrain model computation from contour lines: How to derive quality information from artifact analysis. . GeoInformatica , 9 : 253 – 268 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough , P. and McDonnell , R. 1998 . Principles of Geographical Information Systems—Spatial Information Systems and Geostatistics , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Carrara , A. , Bitelli , G. and Carla , R. 1997 . Comparison of techniques for generating digital terrain models from contour lines. . International Journal of Geographical Information Science , 11 : 451 – 473 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilès , J. ‐P. and Delfiner , P. 1999 . Geostatistics—Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Cressie , N. A. C. 1991 . Statistics for Spatial Data , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Dennis Jr. , J. E. and Schnabel , R. B. 1983 . Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice‐Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch , C. V. and Journel , A. G. 1998 . GSLIB—Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ebner , H. , Hofmann‐Wellenhof , B. , Reiss , P. and Steidler , F. 1980 . “ HIFI—A minicomputer program package for height interpolation by finite elements. ” . In International Archives of Photogrammetry, 23/B4 , 202 – 215 . Hamburg : Committee of the 14th International Congress for Photogrammetry .
   Google Scholar
• Ehlschlaeger , C. R. 1998 . “ The stochastic simulation approach: Tools for representing spatial application uncertainty. ” . PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara
   Google Scholar
• Ehlschlaeger , C. R. 2002 . Representing multiple spatial statistics in generalized elevation uncertainty models: Moving beyond the variogram. . International Journal of Geographical Information Science , 16 : 259 – 285 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , P. F. 1991 . First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: The accuracy of the viewshed area. . Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing , 57 : 1321 – 1327 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , P. F. 1998 . Improved modeling of elevation error with geostatistics. . GeoInformatica , 2 : 215 – 233 .
   Google Scholar
• Florinsky , I. V. 1998 . Combined analysis of digital terrain models and remotely sensed data in landscape investigations. . Progress in Physical Geography , 22 : 33 – 60 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florinsky , I. V. 2002 . Errors of signal processing in digital terrain modelling. . International Journal of Geographical Information Science , 16 : 475 – 501 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild , M. F. 1995 . “ Attribute accuracy. ” . In Elements of Spatial Data Quality , Edited by: Guptill , S. C and Morrisson , J. L . 59 – 79 . Oxford : Elsevier Scientific .
   Google Scholar
• Goovaerts , P. 1997 . Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Haining , R. P. , Griffith , D. A. and Bennet , R. J. 1983 . Simulating two‐dimensional autocorrelated surfaces. . Geographical Analysis , 15 : 247 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkli , P. 2004 . “ Practical test on accuracy and usability of virtual reference station method in Finland. ” . In Conference Proceedings of FIG Working Week 2004 , 1 – 16 . Athens, , Greece : FIG .
   Google Scholar
• Heuvelink , G. B. M. 1998 . Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS , London : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Heuvelink , G. B. M. 2002 . “ Analysing uncertainty propagation in GIS: Why is it not that simple? ” . In Uncertainty in Remote Sensing and GIS , Edited by: Foody , G. M and Atkinson , P. M . 155 – 165 . Chichester, , UK : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Higdon , D. M. 1998 . A process‐convolution approach to modelling temperatures in the North Atlantic Ocean. . Journal of Environmental and Ecological Statistics , 5 : 173 – 190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higdon , D. M. , Swall , J. and Kern , J. C. 1999 . “ Non‐stationary spatial modeling. ” . In Bayesian statistics 6: Proceedings of the sixth Valencia international meeting , Edited by: Bernardo , J. M , Berger , J. O , Dawid , A. P and Smith , A. F. M . 761 – 768 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Holmes , K. W. , Chadwick , O. A. and Kyriakidis , P. C. 2000 . Error in a USGS 30‐meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling. . Journal of Hydrology , 233 : 154 – 173 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn , B. 1981 . Hill shading and the reflectance map. . Proceedings of IEEE , 69 : 14 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter , G. J. and Goodchild , M. F. 1995 . Dealing with error in spatial databases: A simple case study. . Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing , 61 : 529 – 537 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter , G. J. and Goodchild , M. F. 1997 . Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases. . Geographical Analysis , 29 : 35 – 49 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson , M. F. and Gallant , J. C. 1999 . “ Representation of terrain. ” . In Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Technical Issues , Edited by: Longley , P. A , Goodchild , M. F , Maguire , D. J and Rhind , D. W . 105 – 124 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson , M. F. and Gallant , J. C. 2000 . “ Digital elevation models and representation of terrain shape. ” . In Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications , Edited by: Wilson , J. P and Gallant , J. C . 29 – 50 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Imhof , E. 1982 . Cartographic Relief Presentation , Berlin : de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Kääriäinen , E. 1963 . Bench Mark List I of the Second Levelling of Finland, Publications of the Finnish Geodetic Institute 57 , Helsinki : Finnish Geodetic Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman , L. and Rousseeuw , P. J. 1990 . Finding Groups in Data—An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Kumler , M. P. 1994 . An intensive comparison of triangulated irregular networks (TINs) and digital elevation models (DEMs). . Cartographica , 31 : 1 – 99 .
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakidis , P. C. , Shortridge , A. M. and Goodchild , M. F. 1999 . Geostatistics for conflation and accuracy assessment of digital elevation models. . International Journal of Geographical Information Science , 13 : 677 – 707 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li , Z. 1988 . On the measure of digital terrain model accuracy. . Photogrammetric Record , 12 : 873 – 877 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li , Z. 1994 . A comparative study of the accuracy of digital terrain models (DTMs) based on various data models. . ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 49 : 2 – 11 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LM (National Land Survey of Sweden). 2002. General description of GSD—the terrain elevation databank. Available online at: http://www.lm.se/english/gsd/e_gehojd.pdf (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Lopez , C. 2000 . Improving the elevation accuracy of digital elevation models: A comparison of some error detection procedures. . Transactions in GIS , 4 : 43 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Matheron , G. 1965 . “ Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation. ” . PhD thesis, Faculty of Sciences, University of Paris, Paris
   Google Scholar
• Miller , C. L. and Laflamme , R. A. 1958 . The digital terrain model—theory and application. . Photogrammetric Engineering , 25 : 433 – 442 .
   Google Scholar
• Milton , J. S. and Arnold , J. C. 1995 . Introduction to Probability and Statistic: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Monckton , C. G. 1994 . “ An Investigation into the spatial structure of error in digital elevation data. ” . In Innovations in GIS: Selected Papers from the first National Conference on GIS Research UK , Edited by: Worboys , M. F . 201 – 211 . London : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Moore , I. D. 1996 . “ Hydrologic modeling and GIS. ” . In GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issues , Edited by: Goodchild , M. F , Steyaert , L. T , Parks , B. O , Johnston , C , Maidment , D , Crane , M and Glendinning , S . 143 – 148 . Fort Collins, CO : GIS World .
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä , J. 1985 . Geological Map of Finland, 1:10 0000, Quaternary Deposits , Helsinki : Geological Survey of Finland and Publication Division of the National Board of Survey .
   Google Scholar
• NLS (National Land Survey of Finland). 2002a. Korkeusmalli 25:n tarkkuusanalyysi (Accuracy analysis of DEM 25). Available online at: http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/Default.asp?id = 148&docid = 1376 (http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/Default.asp?id = 148&docid = 1376) (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• NLS (National Land Survey of Finland). 2002b. NLS topograhic database. Available online at: http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/default.asp?id = 488 (http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/default.asp?id = 488) (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen , J. 2003 . “ Tracing the gross errors of DEM—visualisation techniques for preliminary quality analysis. ” . In Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference , 2410 – 2415 . Durban, South Africa : International Cartographic Association .
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen , J. and Sarjakoski , T. 2005a . Error propagation analysis of DEM‐based drainage basin delineation. . International Journal of Remote Sensing , 26 : 3085 – 3102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen , J. and Sarjakoski , T. 2005b . Error propagation of DEM‐based surface derivatives. . Computers and Geosciences , 31 : 1015 – 1027 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollikainen , M. 2002 . “ The Finnish geoid model FIN2000. ” . In Proceedings of the 14th General Meeting of the Nordic Geodetic Commission , 111 – 116 . Kirkkonummi, Finland : Nordic Geodetic Commission .
   Google Scholar
• Ollikainen M, Ollikainen M. 2004. The Finnish coordinate reference systems. Available online at: http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/default.asp?id = 0&docid = 2507 (http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/default.asp?id = 0&docid = 2507) (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• OS (Ordnance Survey). 2001. Land‐form PROFILE TM : User guide. Available online at: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/products/landformprofile/pdf/profil_w.pdf (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Östman , A. 1987 . Accuracy estimation of digital elevation data banks. . Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing , 53 : 425 – 430 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike , R. J. 2000 . Geomorphometry—diversity in quantitative surface analysis. . Progress in Physical Geography , 24 : 1 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at: http://www.R‐project.org (http://www.R-project.org) (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro Jr. , P. J. and Diggle , P. J. 2001 . geoR: A package for geostatistical analysis. . R‐NEWS , 1–2 : 15 – 18 .
   Google Scholar
• Rieger , W. 1996 . “ Accuracy of slope information derived from DEM‐data. ” . In International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 31/B4 , 690 – 695 . Vienna : Austrian Society of Surveying and Geoinformation .
   Google Scholar
• Salli , I. 1955 . Geological Map of Finland, 1:10 0000, Pre‐Quarternary Rocks , Helsinki : Geological Survey of Finland and National Survey Board .
   Google Scholar
• Schenk , T. 2001 . “ Modeling and analyzing systematic errors in airborne laser scanners. Technical Notes in Photogrammetry 19, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University ” .
   Google Scholar
• Shortridge , A. M. 2001 . “ Characterizing uncertainty in digital elevation models. ” . In Spatial Uncertainty for Ecology: Implications for Remote Sensing and GIS Applications , Edited by: Hunsaker , C , Goodchild , M , Friedl , M and Case , T. J . 238 – 257 . New York : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Shortridge , A. M. and Clarke , K. C. 1999 . “ On some limitations of square raster cell structures for digital elevation data modeling. ” . In Spatial Accuracy Assessment: Land Information Uncertainty in Natural Recources , Edited by: Lowell , K and Jaton , A . 341 – 347 . Chelsea, MI : Ann Arbor Press .
   Google Scholar
• Soininen , A. 2003 . TerraScan User's Guide , Helsinki : Terrasolid .
   Google Scholar
• Thiébaux , H. J. and Pedder , M. A. 1987 . Spatial Objective Analysis: With Applications in Atmospheric Science , London : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• TopoSys. 2005. TopoSys Falcon—technical data. Available online at: http://www.toposys.com/toposys‐en/lidar‐systems/falcon‐technical‐data.php?print = true (http://www.toposys.com/toposys-en/lidar-systems/falcon-technical-data.php?print = true) (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Torlegård , K. , Östman , A. and Lindgren , R. 1986 . A comparative test of photogrammetrically sampled digital elevation models. . Photogrammetria , 41 : 1 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2000. US GeoData digital elevation models: Fact sheet 040‐00. Available online at: http://erg.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs04000.html (accessed 12 October 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Veregin , H. 1997 . The effects of vertical error in digital elevation models on the determination of flow‐path direction. . Cartography and Geographic Information Systems , 24 : 67 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Veriö , A. 1984 . “ Coordinate Systems. ” . In Mapping of Finland, Atlas of Finland, Appendix 112 , Edited by: Niemelä , O . 6 Helsinki : National Board of Survey, Geographical Society of Finland .
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler , S. P. 2003 . “ Perceptions of digital elevation model uncertainty by DEM users. ” . In URISA Journal Vol. 15 , 57 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Weibel , R. and Heller , M. 1991 . “ Digital terrain modelling. ” . In Geographical Information Systems—Volume 1: Principles , Edited by: Maguire , D. J , Goodchild , M. F and Rhind , D. W . 269 – 297 . Harlow, , UK : Longman Scientific & Technical .
   Google Scholar
• Wilson , J. P. and Gallant , J. C. 2000 . “ Digital terrain analysis. ” . In Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications , Edited by: Wilson , J. P and Gallant , J. C . 1 – 27 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Wise , S. 1998 . “ The effect of GIS interpolation errors on the use of digital elevation models in geomorphology. ” . In Landform Monitoring, Modelling and Analysis , Edited by: Lane , S. N , Richards , K. S and Chandler , J. H . 139 – 164 . Chichester, , UK : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Wood , J. D. 1996 . “ The geomorphological characterisation of digital elevation models. ” . PhD thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
   Google Scholar
• Wood , J. D. and Fisher , P. F. 1993 . Assessing interpolation accuracy in elevation models. . IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications , 13 : 48 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen , L. W. and Thorne , C. R. 1987 . Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. . Earth Surface Processes and Landforms , 12 : 47 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang , J. and Goodchild , M. F. 2002 . Uncertainty in Geographical Information , London : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar